The one I got from kwhi43 looks a little bit better. Oh yea Phil my son came over tonight, thought I would have to fight him to keep that thing here. Another one on the way to the Dark Side
Why is the "1922" improperly stamped on the cylinder? The top of the numbers are gone, but there is insufficient wear meaning they were not made by punches to be used on a rounded surface? Isn't that a bit "off" for Colt for that period? Maybe I'm wrong?
Compare the cylinder markings on a fine cased Third Model Dragoon sold by a major auction house last year for $31,000. The bottom line should read "COLT'S PATENT". The Gun Broker cylinder has obviously been very crudely restamped.
I see what appear to me to be investment Casting sprue 'ghosts' and superficial shrinkage fissures on the Grip where the Stocks are removed -
All those tiny dents on the sides of the Wedge area, and, all the dents and deformation on the Barrel top above...might even be 'genuine', if the Revolver belonged previously to someone who would hit it with things in those areas, trying to get the Barrel Assembly off of the Arbor ( instead of using the Loading Lever on a half-bore position of the Cylinder, to do it ).
On the left, the "U.S." on the frame of a martially marked Third Model Dragoon with a serial number about 400 numbers away from the one in question. On the right, the one in question.
Where the Brass Trigger Guard meets the Frame, on the authentic Original, we see a refined Bevel leaving a sort of almost Knife edge to the Brass, parallel to the lower Frame...
On the impostor, we see an indifferent treatment there.
Also, some difference to the profile of the lower Frame itself...where the front of the Trigger Guard ends.
Colt Firearms 1836-1960, James E. Serven
"COLT'S PT. F.A. MFG. CO. HARTFORD CT. U.S.A." was not used until after Sam Colt's death, during the cartridge era (factory conversions and original cartridege pistols).
I compared my Uberti to the comparison photos and my cylinder markings are very close to the original. Except it doesn't say Colts Patent, that space is blank.
My Uberti has very few markings. Only about 5 faint proofs, 2 serial numbers, and the cylinder markings. There are no markings at all on the top of the barrel.
I have a question??? Could it be an antique fake? I mean somebody made it 100 years ago to fake being a Colt, sold it as such, and so it's an antique fake, and not a faked antique? Might be cool if it was such, but you folks are right, not worth $5K.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.