John Lott: Bound to Misfire

Status
Not open for further replies.

gunsmith

member
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
5,906
Location
Reno, Nevada
Bound to Misfire
110703D_large.jpg


This week President Bush's program, Project Childsafe, begins distributing 20 million gun locks. Over 712,000 locks will be given out just in New York. It seems like such a reasonable program, who could oppose it? After all, if a gun lock can save a life, it seems a small cost. Unfortunately, despite the obvious feel-good appeal of these rules, gun locks and safe storage laws are more likely to cost lives than to save them.



Many have seen the public service ads put out by the Clinton Justice Department showing the voices or pictures of children between the ages of four and eight, implying that there is an epidemic of accidental deaths of these young children. The ads create the impression that the archetype case involves naturally curious children shooting themselves or other children.



Take the discussion in one of the ads from 2000: "My brother Omar was eight years old when he died. He had a hole in his tummy. A bullet hit him. The gun came from the garage. I was just playing. I didn't mean to shoot daddy's gun."



Accidental gun deaths tragically claim children's lives, though fortunately they are much rarer than most people might think. During 2000 there were 37 accidental gun deaths for children under 10 in the U.S., In 1999 there were 31, and only six of these cases actually involved a child firing the gun. Indeed from 1995 to 1999 the entire United States saw only between five and nine cases a year where a child under ten either accidentally shot themselves or another child.



Obviously we want to avoid any deaths where possible, but some perspective is useful. With over 90 million adults owning a gun and almost 40 million children under 10, it is hard to think of almost any other potentially dangerous products kept in American homes that have as few accidental deaths associated with them. Over 1,260 children under ten died in cars in 1999. Another 370 died as pedestrians hit by cars. Accidents involving residential fires took 484 children's lives. Even 92 children under the age of five drowned accidentally in bathtubs.



The overwhelming majority of gun owners must be extremely careful or such gun accidents would be much more frequent.



Those who accidentally fire a gun are not typical people. Shooters are overwhelmingly adults who have problems with alcoholism and long criminal histories, particularly arrests for violent acts. They are also disproportionately involved in automobile crashes and are much more likely to have had their driver's license suspended or revoked. Even if these individuals were to use a lock, locks are not designed to stop adult males from firing their own gun.



Gun locks have their own problems. Most importantly, the increased time it takes to get the gun ready to deter a criminal. Locked guns are not as readily accessible for defensive gun uses. If criminals are deterred from attacking victims because they fear people might defend themselves, gun locks may therefore increase crime. Exacerbating this problem, many mechanical locks (such as barrel or trigger locks) also require that the gun be stored unloaded. Loading a gun obviously requires yet more time to respond to a criminal.



Guns clearly deter criminals, with Americans using guns defensively over 2 million times each year -- 4.5 times more frequently than the 500,000 times guns were used to commit crimes in 2001. Over 90 percent of the time simply brandishing the weapon stops an attack. Even though the police are extremely important at reducing crime, they simply can't be there all the time and virtually always end up at the crime scene after the crime has been committed.



Even if one has young children, it does not make sense to lock up a gun if one lives in a high crime urban area. Exaggerating the risks involved in gun ownership will make people lock up their guns or cause them not to own a gun in the first place and will result in more deaths, not fewer deaths.



Recent research that I have done in my book, The Bias Against Guns, examined juvenile accidental gun deaths and suicides for all the states in the United States from 1977 to 1998, found that safe storage laws had no impact on either type of death. However, what did happen was that law-abiding citizens were less able to defend themselves against crime. The sixteen states that adopted these laws during this period faced over 300 more murders and 4,000 more rapes per year. Burglaries also increased dramatically.



No one is exempt from criticism, whether Bush, Clinton, or the media. Unfortunately, bad advice, no matter how well intentioned, can have tragic consequences and cost lives.



Lott, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, is the author of the book The Bias Against Guns (Regnery, 2003
http://www.techcentralstation.com/
 
I've no children. If I'd had children, I'd have begun introducing them to shooting by the age of four or five, and they'd have grown up knowing guns aren't toys.

If I had a mentally ill teen-aged child who might—even might— pose a problem with firearms, I'd obviously secure my firearms. There are no freedoms without responsibility.
 
There is a place for gun locks, just as there is a place for child-proof caps and the many other safety products made for children. It will always be up to the parents to make their homes safe for their children.

The problem with programs such as Project Childsafe is they are a waste of resources as well as time. When you have less than 40 children being accidentally killed by firearms each year, how is distributing 20 million gun locks going to decrease that number?

The purpose of Project Childsafe is to allow Bush to suck up to the antis without really annoying the pro-gun voters. They can all sit around feeling warm and fuzzy because they are doing something to keep the children safe from the evils of guns. The mere fact that the something is totally useless is irrelevant.
 
If I had a mentally ill teen-aged child who might—even might— pose a problem with firearms, I'd obviously secure my firearms. There are no freedoms without responsibility.

Bravo!

WildproudtobreathethesameairasyouAlaska
 
Even the best-raised and most thoroughly gun-educated children can be curious. I keep my HD handguns in a ready-access push-button safe which takes me about 3 additional seconds to gain entry to.
 
3 seconds can be the difference between life and death, I am along the lines of gun proofing kids, instead of kid proofing guns. all my firearms are locked up, except my CCW piece of the day, which is on my person until I go to sleep, when it sits right next to me in my locked room. You should se me in my skivvies with a fobus holster or fannypack on!
 
my sister has two boys that have some developmental problems. the oldest, 13, has been diagnosed as 'manic-depressive', has spent time at North Star Behavioral after talking about suicide (which included ideas of taking one of my guns to kill himself with), and has to be on medications to level out his moods.
the younger boy, 11, has ADD and ADHD. he too is on ritalin and other meds to help regulate his actions.

both those boys, now back with their crack-head mother in WA, are not even trustworthy with a sharp instrument. it pained me that i couldnt teach them how to shoot with pellet guns or 22s. however, when they came to my place, i never hid the guns. they did respect that they were never to touch them unless i handed them to them after clearing them. they never held any of my handguns, aside from inspecting a barrel or slide, and held my mauser a couple time so they could see how heavy it was.

was i irresponsible letting them do that much? imho, no. it was all supervised by me. i'd never leave them alone in my home however.

i regret that i never got the opportunity to show my sisters two neices how to shoot. they would have taken nicely to a 22. now they'll have to wait until they are adults to come back up here, what with crackhead mommy not wanting them to have any contact with the family up here.
 
Locks are false security. Easily defeated by anyone with a little determination and patience.

I grew up around loaded unlocked guns as did my children. Respect for property ownership must be genetic? I've never personally heard of anyone who had a problem because of an unlocked or loaded gun in the house not counting media reports.

Political feelgoodism over something so rare is a huge waste of taxpayer's money. :barf:
 
Not to mention that trigger locks are a truly moronic device. A locking device that will allow you to load the gun, chamber a round and then disengage the safety. Now you have a loaded pistol with a round in the pipe, the safety off and something stuck through the trigger guard.

Good idea.

Small bicycle cable locks that are run up through the magazine well and out the ejection port are far superior.

Tigger locks. Bah. <ptooey>

- Gabe
 
Based on a small exhibit building in my non-secure gun junk storage area, I suggest we begin a collection of all unused locks (such as those sold BY LAW with new weapons in CA) and create a massive art display.

Anyone have a project title / caption? Operation Wishful Thinking
 
In the PRK, you need to bring a lock or buy a lock when you purchase a new gun.. :barf:

So I suggested people bring in "donation locks" so those who didn't know don't get screwed out of $15 for a lock they will never use. There's usually a fish bowl with locks inside.
 
I strongly support making firearms inaccessible (to kids, burglars, whatever) when they're not under the owner's immediate control. However, I think firearm locks are too easily defeated (and, in many cases, just plain unreliable) to serve the purpose. I'd much rather see owners buy a gun cabinet (or better still, a fully-fledged gun safe) and secure the firearms there. This is what I do with all of mine, even though I seldom have kids or visitors coming to my home. If the gun isn't under my immediate control (read, in a holster on my hip, or being cleaned, or something like that) it's locked away.
 
Yup, me too these days.

Thing are a lot different when your young and/or poor though. A gun safe costs as much as a gun. What comes first the chicken or the egg? Errrr, I mean the guns or the safe?

I've been giving the cable locks away to kids for their bicycles.
 
Gun locks? Forget it.


My two pistols are secured in GunVault gun safes. Locked and loaded, secure, but can be gotten to in 5 seconds.

I am teaching my kid about them and he can show me how to make both pistols safe. But we have other kids in the house sometimes so I need to have them locked away.
 
3 seconds can be the difference between life and death, I am along the lines of gun proofing kids, instead of kid proofing guns.
I take it you do not have children? If you did, you would understand that for all kids, there is an age of responsibility after which they have sufficient mental maturity to understand the basic concepts of gun safety, life and death, and the consequences of their actions. This is more than simply "teaching them to do right", it is also a function of the physiological development of their brain. For some kids, that age comes earlier than others. If properly raised, a child upon reaching that age will exhibit the rational decision-making abilities and mental maturity that are traits of a true adult. At that point, a child can be trusted to properly handle a firearm, even without the oversight of an adult. Before then, you are playing Russian roulette with your child.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top