Jury acquits woman of first-degree murder (TN)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't access that site without registering (which I and many others won't do for privacy reasons). How about posting the full text of the article?
 
I think I would kill anybody that harmed my family. But we really don't know how much evidence she had, and you are still innocent until proven guilty in this country. If they know for sure that he did it, then I think they should let her go.

Anthony
 
Jury acquits woman of first-degree murder

Panel deadlocked on lesser charge for Blount mother who killed daughter's alleged rapist

By JAMIE SATTERFIELD, [email protected]
April 16, 2005

MARYVILLE - After more than 14 hours of deliberations, a Blount County jury on Friday acquitted a mother who killed her daughter's alleged rapist of first-degree murder.

But Kimberly E. Cunningham, 33, of Knoxville is not in the clear. Jurors deadlocked on whether she should be convicted of a lesser charge.


"They're relieved because Mom goes home tonight," defense attorney Bruce Poston said of the Cunningham family's reaction to the jury's announcement. "It was huge that they rendered a (not guilty) verdict on first-degree murder. By eliminating first, a new trial starts at (a charge of) second-degree (murder)."

The difference is vast. A conviction on first-degree murder would have netted Cunningham a minimum 51-year prison term. The maximum sentence for second-degree murder is 25 years.

Cunningham shot Coy Calloway Hundley eight times in the parking lot of Slide Lock Tool Co. on Topside Road in Alcoa in October 2003. Four of those gunshot wounds were to his head.

Blount County Assistant District Attorney General Robert Headrick argued that Cunningham went to Hundley's workplace armed and planning to kill him. He pointed to the fact that she emptied her five-shot revolver and then reloaded and emptied the gun a second time in the fatal shooting.

Headrick could not be immediately reached for comment Friday evening. Hundley's relatives have declined during the trial to comment.

Cunningham has testified that on the day of the fatal shooting she learned that Hundley had allegedly raped her youngest daughter. She contended she only went to his workplace to confront him.

She testified Hundley laughed at her and mocked her. She insisted she did not remember killing him.

She testified that she was already grappling with allegations that Hundley's teenage son had molested that same daughter and her son, and she had gotten a permit to carry a gun after Hundley allegedly threatened her over those allegations.

Poston had urged jurors to acquit Cunningham of any homicide charge, arguing that she was in a "trance-like" state and unaware of what she was doing.

The trial, presided over by Judge Kelly Thomas, was an emotional one, with Cunningham's youngest daughter and son both testifying about alleged molestation. Her husband of 18 years buried his head in his hands during his children's testimony.

Emotions ran even higher when, just two hours after deliberations began Thursday, jurors told Thomas they had a question.

"Does Tennessee have a death penalty?" they wrote to the judge.

The question unnerved Poston and left the Cunningham family in tears.

Thomas answered the panel by saying, "Tennessee does have the death penalty, but the state is not seeking the death penalty in this case."

The jury announced their decision around 6:30 p.m. Friday.

Although Poston said he considered the acquittal a victory, he was shocked the issue of premeditation was even up for debate. At worst, Poston has argued, Cunningham could be convicted of voluntary manslaughter, which is the killing of a person in the heat of passion.

"It still stuns me that when a mother is told her daughter was raped that a jury wouldn't consider that in the heat of passion in terms of the shooting," he said.

Under Tennessee law, there is no one-size-fits-all definition of murder. Instead, there are degrees with each carrying different penalties. The differences revolve around how culpable a person is for a death.

A person who plots to kill someone - the so-called cold-blooded killer - rates the highest charge and the toughest penalty. Next comes second-degree murder, in which a person did not plan a slaying but knew exactly what he or she was doing when committing the murder.

Voluntary manslaughter is the killing of someone in the heat of passion. The man who finds his wife in a compromising position with his best friend and kills them in an eruption of fury is the most familiar example.

Reckless homicide and criminally negligent homicide involve cases where a person's conduct causes death, though that person did not intend to kill anyone.

Thomas set a May 17 status conference on Cunningham's case to determine if prosecutors will seek a trial on second-degree murder charges or if the case can be resolved with a plea agreement.

Knoxville lawyer Bruce Poston and the family of Kimberly Cunningham gather for a hug in the front of a Blount County courtroom. Cunningham was acquitted Friday of first-degree murder in the slaying of Coy Callaway Hundley.

Jamie Satterfield may be reached at 865-342-6308.
 
Hell hath no fury like Mom. Maybe allowing mothers and fathers a first crack at rapists would curtail some of it. I'm all for that.

Greg
 
Since no one's said it yet...

Cunningham shot Coy Calloway Hundley eight times in the parking lot of Slide Lock Tool Co. on Topside Road in Alcoa in October 2003. Four of those gunshot wounds were to his head.

Blount County Assistant District Attorney General Robert Headrick argued that Cunningham went to Hundley's workplace armed and planning to kill him. He pointed to the fact that she emptied her five-shot revolver and then reloaded and emptied the gun a second time in the fatal shooting.

8 hits, including 4 headshots, out of 10 rounds = good shooting!
 
The difference is vast. A conviction on first-degree murder would have netted Cunningham a minimum 51-year prison term. The maximum sentence for second-degree murder is 25 years.

Is it really punishment, though, if you think it was worth it?
 
She insisted she did not remember killing him.

Poston had urged jurors to acquit Cunningham of any homicide charge, arguing that she was in a "trance-like" state and unaware of what she was doing.

Or at least, that's what her lawyers told her to say.
 
That lady should have bought a lottery ticket on the same day of the verdict.

By law, she should be in prison for quite a while. Looks like she found the right jury.
 
Mom is 33 year old. It was her youngest kid that was raped. A perpetrator of a rape on a kid got what he richly deserved. No red state jury won't have some sympathy for mom.
 
Whilst I have enormous sympathy for this mother, I think there are two factors that make this rather more than an excusable offence...

1. How do we know the man was guilty? He's never been tried or convicted, and now there is no chance of this happening. If someone I'd never seen came up to me and accused me of raping her daughter, and I said "You're crazy!" or something like that, this could be construed as me "taunting" her, and if she shot me (innocent of the crime), I'd never be in a position to argue the point, would I?

2. I don't buy the "don't remember" bit. If she reloaded, she knew what she was doing. I think this is clearly a case of second-degree murder.

I think an appropriate sentence would be 3 to 5 years confinement, followed by parole.
 
I don't feel real great about it either. But I think that the general citizen is getting fed up with the apparent lack of concern by the legal system. They are tired of things taking 5 years to get to court, minimal sentences, and perps getting probation.
 
I thought that this was just too ironic:
"Cunningham shot Coy Calloway Hundley eight times in the parking lot of Slide Lock Tool Co"
until I got to the part about her using a revolver.
Sorry for making light of a tragic situation.
 
This is the part that bothers me:

and she had gotten a permit to carry a gun after Hundley allegedly threatened her over those allegations.

I've never heard of anyone getting a CC permit go "hunting", and IF this is an example it gives the other side some ammo.
 
1. The guy alledgedly rapes your kid

2. He alledgedly threatens you.

Seems like enough provocation for a lot of folks to go on a hunting expedition. I think that they'll retry her on a lesser charge and get a conviction.
 
Double jeopardy?

What I am offended the most by in this incident is the fact that she was aquitted by a jury of her peers and stands a high probability of going to trial again for the same incident called by a different name. Whether the prosecutor bit off more charge than he had evidence to prove or whether the jury chose to nullify is irrelevant. She was aquitted of crime for the act of killing a man with a gun. To continue to persue her on that offense cheapens our already corrupted judicial system. I have never agreed with this "...and if you can't convict on this charge, please consider this lesser charge, and if not that charge then call me and we'll think of something else..." attitude. A very small amount of that is surely driven by the bankrupt judges in this country who seem to favor the criminals over the victims. I suspect that most of it, however, is driven by prosecutors whose sole desire is to drive up their conviction numbers regardless of whether or not justice is served. We need to reign in prosecutors like that so that attitude is not present should YOU ever be on trial for a JUSTIFIED killing. Think about it.


I.C.
 
1. How do we know the man was guilty? He's never been tried or convicted, and now there is no chance of this happening.

Here is where lack of info presented hampers our discussion. It is not uncommon for the people involved to know exactly who committed a crime and the police to be unable to get a conviction, for both good and bad reasons. Under our system of "rule of law" we are supposed to ignore the failings of the govt and just go on about our lives. Yeah right. I'm a big fan of the rule of law but I am a bigger fan of justice.

Was justice served here? I don't think we know from the info we have but my gut says it was.

Insidous _calms point is an excellent one. If the courts can keep re-trying untill they get the outcome they want, and this includes moving to a new jurisdiction, then none of us are safe.

She testified that she was already grappling with allegations that Hundley's teenage son had molested that same daughter and her son, and she had gotten a permit to carry a gun after Hundley allegedly threatened her over those allegations.

This also sounds like the family business was rape and intidimation. If this was a pattern for the Hundley clan, the police probably knew about it. That may be why the permit wasn't stopped, if the police felt she might have been in danger. If the police weren't doing anything about the family business, I can understand why the mother felt she had to do something herself. If so, I would clearly call this self-defense even though it wouldn't meet the legal defination.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top