Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Jury Clears Gunmaker in Accidental Shooting

Discussion in 'Legal' started by gunsmith, Aug 3, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    Even though it should have never have gone to trial I sure am glad a Jury in uber liberal Oakland had some common sense for once.
    http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040803/nytu217_1.html
    Press Release Source: National Shooting Sports Foundation


    Jury Clears Gun Maker in Accidental Shooting
    Tuesday August 3, 5:37 pm ET
    Handgun Control, Inc. Strikes out in Third Retrial of Case


    OAKLAND, Calif., Aug. 3 /PRNewswire/ -- An Alameda County Superior Court jury yesterday found that firearm manufacturer Beretta U.S.A. Corp. was not responsible for the tragic 1994 accidental shooting death of a 14-year-old boy. Kenzo Dix was killed when his friend played with a firearm that was left loaded and unlocked by an irresponsible parent. The jury deliberated only five hours before returning a verdict in favor of Beretta U.S.A. Corp., finding the pistol's design did not cause the accident.
    This was the third time the case had been tried. The lawsuit was filed in 1995 on behalf of the parents of Dix by lawyers from Handgun Control Inc. (since renamed as Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence). Handgun Control Inc. tried to claim Beretta was at fault for not having included a built-in lock and for not providing more warnings by having a different "loaded chamber indicator" feature than the one on the firearm. The case gained national media attention in late 1998 when a jury in the first trial found that the design of the Beretta pistol was not defective and did not cause the accident. An appellate court, however, ordered a retrial because a juror allegedly told fellow jurors he didn't think Beretta was at fault before the jury began its deliberations. In a retrial last year the plaintiffs were again unable to convince a jury that the pistol's design was defective and caused the accident resulting in a mistrial.

    The Dix case was the first major lawsuit filed and funded by the Brady Center against a firearms manufacturer in an attempt to use litigation to force the redesign of firearms to include so-called "safety" devices. The Brady Center has filed similar suits against other manufacturers.

    "The Brady Center has struck out. This jury -- as two others before it -- listened carefully to all the evidence and again refused to blame the product manufacturer for reckless misuse of its product," said Lawrence G. Keane, senior vice president and general counsel of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearm industry's trade association.

    "Unquestionably, the Brady Center has suffered a major setback in its efforts to use the courts to force its gun control agenda upon product manufacturers and their design engineers who care deeply about the safety of consumers and who design safe and reliable products," Keane added. He noted that the number and rate of firearm accidents are at their lowest levels since record keeping began in 1903 -- all while the number of firearms in private ownership has grown.

    "We are sorry for the tragedy suffered by the Dix family and we hope publicity from this case will warn parents who own firearms to store them unloaded and locked if they have teenage children," said Jeff Reh, general counsel for Beretta U.S.A. "It also bears mentioning, though, that three juries have looked at the facts of this case and not one has agreed with the plaintiffs nor with the attorneys at Handgun Control, Inc. that the design of a pistol somehow caused this accident. When a firearm owner leaves his unlocked, loaded pistol where his teenage son can find it, and when that son fails to check the firing chamber -- something he knew how to do -- to see if the gun is loaded, then pointed the pistol at a friend, disengaged the safety lever and then pulled the trigger, it should be obvious that human carelessness, not a pistol design, caused the accident."

    This release is also available in the Press Room section of the
    http:/www.NSSF.org Web site.




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Source: National Shooting Sports Foundation
     
  2. stv

    stv Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    407
    Location:
    SF CA
    Excellent news - I've been following this pretty closely since it's local. Good for Beretta, and good for other manufacturers as well.
     
  3. redhead

    redhead Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    Pleasant Hill, CA
    After 9 years and 3 trials, will the Brady Center finally realize the it's not the gun that's at fault here?
     
  4. boofus

    boofus Guest

    Watch out for Quadruple Jeopardy... coming soon, compliments of the brady bunch :barf:
     
  5. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    I wonder what took them so long to decide.:rolleyes:

    I hope the losers have to pay all of the winners cost.:evil:
     
  6. 444

    444 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    8,086
    Location:
    Ohio
    "After 9 years and 3 trials, will the Brady Center finally realize the it's not the gun that's at fault here?"

    They are accomplishing their goal anyway by bleeding the companies dry in legal fees. I am not so sure this isn't their stadegy to begin with. Either way, they win.
     
  7. PATH

    PATH Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,844
    Location:
    Rockland, New York
    Maybe it is time to go out and buy a Beretta! Then send a note to Sarah and her cronies and tell them why you bought a Beretta. Just to rub their noses in it!:D
     
  8. Warren

    Warren Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,454
    Location:
    Northern California
    So what was wrong with the gun?

    It went off when the trigger was pulled. I thought that was how they were supposed to work.
     
  9. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    I'm sure the leftist extremists knew that all along. Their goals are to bankrupt firearms manufacturers with legal costs, as well as drive up the cost of firearms. They're succeeding whether they win, lose, or draw in the courts.
     
  10. ClonaKilty

    ClonaKilty Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    272
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    Gunsmith, thank you for posting this -- awesome news!

    What was interesting in this case was the issue of having a "loaded chamber indicator" which the CA legislature has now mandated for all new pistols. Beretta had put an indicator on the gun at an attempt to make the gun "safer," but it wound up being the focal point of the lawsuit! That is, the gun DID have a loaded chamber indicator, and the kid still ignored it. Dix's argument was that the indicator "wasn't big enough." So ironically, if Beretta hadn't even put the indicator on the gun the plaintiff wouldn't have had a case!

    I am glad the jury had the sense to see this was ludicrous -- three times in a row!

    Ditto the comment about buying Beretta. When I'm in the market for an over-under I'll certainly put them at the top of my list.
     
  11. Kharn

    Kharn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,999
    Location:
    Maryland
    Doesnt Beretta have a policy of suing those that sue them in order to recover court & lawyer costs?

    Hopefully they follow up on that, their legal department's salaries being paid by the Brady's would be hilarious.

    Kharn
     
  12. Yowza

    Yowza Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    I don't know too much about the retrial, but can someone enlighten me as to why not getting the verdict they wanted is the same as a mistrial. Was it a hung jury, or something?

    Rick
     
  13. ClonaKilty

    ClonaKilty Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    272
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    see the following excerpt from the original post:

     
  14. Leatherneck

    Leatherneck Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,545
    Location:
    No. Virginia and Northern Neck
    Kharn
    I sure hope they do. This nonsense has gone on long enough. The Brady bunch obviously knew the gun was not defective and persisted in this litigation purely for the sake of harassing Beretta. I wish fervently that they would countersue and break the Brady bank. :fire:

    TC
    TFL Survivor

    My newish Brigadier 92FS has a loaded chamber indicator that is too small to depend on, either by feel or by sight; the manual clearly states that a manual chamber check is required.
     
  15. Don of Kalifornia

    Don of Kalifornia Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    AZ
    It's time for Beretta, to sue not only the brady bunch,but Griffin Dix personally for harressment! Maybe even those of us who live in Alameda county to request the D.A. here start filling charges against at least Dix and maybe even the brady bunch for wasting valueable courtroom space with their phony lawsuits.
     
  16. ClonaKilty

    ClonaKilty Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    272
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    Don, I'm with you there. I hear tell one of the OAK Asst. DAs is a member of Front Sight, so we might have some pro-gun help there.
     
  17. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    No, you need to teach your kids some responsibility in general and responsible handling of firearms in particular.

    There is no reason why a (responsible) 14 year old should not have access to a firearm.

    I don't suppose the cops and DA ever looked at murder or manslaughter charges for the teenage shooter in this case ????? Sounds to me like a deliberate shooting, followed by the classical "I didn't know the gun was loaded ..." :barf:
     
  18. txgho1911

    txgho1911 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    973
    Location:
    Indiana;
    Call fir Jim March

    Any chance Barretta can or will retaliate on HCI? Would the legislature be stood on ear for it? Maybe the only thing to keep this case from going onto ROUND 4!
     
  19. Yowza

    Yowza Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    But that was in reference to the first retrial. They don't say why there was a second retrial.

    Rick
     
  20. Mute

    Mute Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2003
    Messages:
    962
    Location:
    Behind occupied territories. CA.
    The fact that this decision came from an Alameda County Jury speaks volumes. Brady Bunch, UP YOURS! :neener:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page