GlackAttack
Member
I am debating for my next concealed carry firearm, my current SR9c is a little large for me (5'11" 165lbs). The Kahr's are attractive to me because of their small size, reliability, and customer service. Also they seem to have many accessories when compared to the nano, keltec and others in this group. I like glock, but these glock clones are much smaller than the G26.
So, help me decide between the 2 in the title, and hell, the .40 versions as well. The pm9 generally sells for about $200 more than the cm9. So far I am leaning towards the pm because it employs polygonal rifling, which is much easier to clean. Also it is much easier to put night sights on the pm, according to my lgs. This is because the front sight is "pinned in" on the cm.. also the pm9 has cool looking bevels on the slide.. the pm comes with extra mag whereas cm does not. im probably missing something but anyways I'm sure some of you have been through this, so I am just asking for input. Any other suggestions are welcome. Anyone own one of these with accessories? I'd love to see them.
So, help me decide between the 2 in the title, and hell, the .40 versions as well. The pm9 generally sells for about $200 more than the cm9. So far I am leaning towards the pm because it employs polygonal rifling, which is much easier to clean. Also it is much easier to put night sights on the pm, according to my lgs. This is because the front sight is "pinned in" on the cm.. also the pm9 has cool looking bevels on the slide.. the pm comes with extra mag whereas cm does not. im probably missing something but anyways I'm sure some of you have been through this, so I am just asking for input. Any other suggestions are welcome. Anyone own one of these with accessories? I'd love to see them.