Kahr Firearms

How Are Kahr Firearms In General?

  • Excellent

    Votes: 23 27.4%
  • Good

    Votes: 33 39.3%
  • Bad

    Votes: 3 3.6%
  • Really Bad

    Votes: 4 4.8%
  • I Would Buy Something Else

    Votes: 10 11.9%
  • No Opinion

    Votes: 11 13.1%

  • Total voters
    84
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ala Dan

Member in memoriam
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
12,877
Location
Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
Greeting's All-

I got my first look at the new Kahr CW-40 yesterday; and was wondering
if anyone has any experience with this weapon? It looks to be a single-
stack .40 caliber, holding a total of 'bout seven (?) rounds. Its a polymer
frame weapon, with a stainless slide. As soon as they are entered into
our inventory, I will check the price and advise.
 
No experience with the 40, but my CW-9 is an excellent CCW. Light,thin, go's bang every time I pull the trigger,and has decent sights. Lot's of post on The High Road were people seem to have trouble with there Kahr's, but my experience has been positive.
 
I voted no opinion. From my experience, if you get a good one it's really good. But, if you get a bad one it's really bad.

I have had 2 Kahr firearms, a PM40 and a CW9. Both were sent back to the factory several times and neither was ever reliable enough for me to think about carrying. This has been the case with several people I know.

However, I have several friends that have Kahr firearms and they say that they are reliable.

I will never own another one though.
 
In the continuing quest for powerful, small, lightweight CCW I've accumulated MK40, P40 and PM40. Last year got the CW9 for cheaper trigger time as ammo costs continue to rise. The CW9 and PM40 had issues out of the box. Kahr sent me the replacement mag catch for the PM40 in record time in response to my Email enquiry. The CW9 had to go back, turn-around could have been faster but the blame is at least 50% my dealer for being slow to ship it and forgetting to call me when it came in :( The CW9 has been perfect since, shooting mostly the cheap Monarch steel cased ammo.

The CW series is a good buy IMHO, basically the same as the P series but with standard rifling instead of polygonal so you can shoot cheaper lead reloads at the price of a bit of velocity loss with factory ammo compared to the polygonal. They also lack the dovetail front sight so are not a good choice if you want night sights.

I'd rate them execellent except for the fact that many have problems during the first couple of hundred rounds. The repaired CW9 is holding up well as I generally shoot a box of ammo thru it every range trip.

Spare mags for the Kahr are way over priced and the CW series only comes with one mag, the MK/P/PM series come with two. But the new Pro-Mag aftermarket Kahr magazines have worked well in my CW9 and are less than half the cost of the factory mags. They come in 7 and 8 round versions, and both have worked great in my gun. I've not had satisfaction with Pro-Mags very often, but am happy with these.

In this power, size, weight combination your choices for something else are nil in .40 and pretty much the Kel-Tec P11 or PF-9 in 9mm (or Rorhbaugh is money is no object) everything else is significantly heavier and probably larger as well unless you drop down to .380ACP.

--wally.
 
My experience with the MK9 Elite has been very good. I had a few failures during break-in, but it has been flawless since that time. Fit and finish are very good, and I'd recommend the MK9 to anyone looking for a compact 9mm.
 
I have had 2 Kahr firearms, a PM40 and a CW9. Both were sent back to the factory several times and neither was ever reliable enough for me to think about carrying. This has been the case with several people I know.

However, I have several friends that have Kahr firearms and they say that they are reliable.

What kind of problems had you encountered RPB?

(And for anyone else with problems, please detail them.)

I have planned on working on possibly getting a carry license this year as a project and, although I have a few compact guns in my collection, felt the Kahrs would be better for the job considering their slimness.
 
On this one I had to vote excellent however I’m basing that on one MK9 that I have owned for 2 months, fired 1200 rounds and found to be highly dependable. Also several people at the indoor range where I shoot have them, both with plastic and all steel frames, and I’ve not heard one complaint. I’ve also found Kahr customer service to be outstanding.
 
Excellent. I like mine.

I have two, one steel and one tupperware. Practice with the steel and carry the plastic.

Cor-Bon 115 +p works in both.

salty.
 
I voted Excellent. My PM9 is one of my most trusted guns when it comes to choosing something to carry. Now that you mention it, I need another one.
 
I voted excelent

Now keep in mind that the only one that I have shot was a very, very early K9. It was all steel and I was amazed at its weight. It was very heavy for a small gun, but shooting it was a pleasure. I really liked it. I have heard some folks complain about their Kahr's but most of the complaints seem to be the smaller polymer frames, but, once again, this is what I have heard, not what I have seen first hand... so, take it for what it's worth. I would definitely buy a K9.
 
No doubt about it the MK40 is easier to shoot, but the PM40 is much easier to carry. If you can go larger, the Taurus Millenium-PRO PT-111(9mm) or PT140 (.40S&W) is a good gun and a tad cheaper than the CW9/40.

--wally.
 
I've had good experiences with both a K9 and MK9 and recommend them whole heartedly.

As far as the polymer guns, i've shied away because of their reputation and price.

Steve
 
I have to friends w/ Kahrs...shot them both and like them. Trigger is a tad longer than it needs to be, but all & all, it's a nice shooter.
 
Dan, my old friend, my only experience with Kahr has been with their MK9 model ...

f34.jpg

... and it was flawlessly from the very first round. It was built like a tank and that added weight really helped to cushion the recoil with such a small gun even with +P's.

The only reason why I still don't own it is because I dislike striker fired guns that lack a repeat striker capability -- but that's just me.
 
After 1100 rounds

1100 rounds through my CW9 and love it. I usually carry a 1911 but for some situations this CW9 is great. I had a few FTF's in the first few hundred rounds but after polishing the feed ramp and rails it has not failed once. It is VERY accurate for a small gun and the trigger is smooth. I recommend it. In the beginning when I had the FTF's I called Dottie and she advised me to polish the ramp and rails. She was very polite and said if that didn't solve the problem to call her back. In my opinion for the price of the gun they should perform that small detail in the factory but it took me only a few minutes with the dremmel and all was fine after that. I haven't had to send it back for anything but all my contacts with Dottie have been excellent.
 
I used to have an MK40 purchased shortly after they were introduced. had a finicky break-in period with a couple jams in the first 500 rds (the ogive of gold dots hit the slide release lever. called Kahr, they sent me a new, improved lever), but after that it was flawless. replaced it with a 642 after a couple years just because .40 in that small of a package was a little much for me. now that I have more experience in handling recoil, I might consider one again. I'm considering a PM45 for ammo compatiblity with my 1911.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top