I stick with rasmussenreports myself
I also took stock in Rasmussen during the last election. They had Bush ahead by 3% even taking into account, their margin of error and look what happened!
No Rasmussen for me, no thanks!
I stick with rasmussenreports myself
I used to think that but found that a large minority of them are actually anarchists.Regarding Libertarians..
At least they do hold the Constitution above all,
Why not take the scores of all of the legitimate polls, not online, add their scores together, and divide by the number of polls to get an average total?I stick with one poll because to jump from poll to poll disallows any decent trend analysis.
I used to think that but found that a large minority of them are actually anarchists.
The campaigns place quite a bit of stock in polls. They base their expenditures in key states based on how close the polling is.
At least they do hold the Constitution above all, and don't twist some of it to their own end. Faith based iniatives with government money? That's hilarious.
The final result of the 2000 election: 48 percent for Gore, 48 percent for Bush, 4 percent other. Note that the DUI appeared to have a very late-breaking effect on Bush’s level of support.
Zogby underestimated Bush by 2, had Gore accurate.
Washington Post had Bush accurate, Gore underestimated by 3.
Pew underestimated Bush by 2; underestimated Gore by 5.
Newsweek underestimated Bush by 3; underestimated Gore by 5.
NBC/Wall Street Journal underestimated Bush by 1; underestimated Gore by 4.
Marist overestimated Bush by 1, underestimated Gore by 4.
Harris underestimated both Bush and Gore by one point.
Gallup had Bush accurate, Gore underestimated by 2.
Fox News underestimated both Bush and Gore by 5 percentage points each.
CBS News underestimated Bush by 4, Gore by 3.
Battleground overestimated Bush by 2, underestimated Gore by 3.