Knives as weapons?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Carl Levitian

member
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
1,160
Location
Maryland
I lost the toothpick from a SwissArmy Knife recently, so I went by a dedicated knife shop that had the tray of Victorinox replacement parts to get another one. While there, I over heard a conversation between a couple of younger guys admire ring some tactical knives. One guy said "Yeah, that'll ruin somebody's day of they get on ya," And another said something similar about some knife with a black blade with a very unusable shape.

NOw, I know I'm an old fart from another era, and things change, but the incident made me thing back to my childhood, and I now things were very very different then. Knives were not looked on as weapons when I was a kid, at least not by the grown up men I looked up to. We lived in a working class neighborhood in Northeast Washington D.C., and there was crime around. ONce in a while you heard about somebody getting rolled, or an assault.

But nobody carried a knife as a weapon. The men who did carry a pocket knife, which was most men, all had some conventional slip joint pocket knife of the day, like a small two blade jack of some type, a boy scout type of knife brought home from the war, or some such. This was not long after WW2, and a lot of men were carrying military issued scout type knives or the TL-29 type knives most of which seemed to be made by camillus. The only single blade knife with a lock on the blade was those Italian style stilleto's and switch blades, which were openly scorned by the men in our little neighborhood as a "punk's weapon."

But people being people, they did carry some non firearm weapons on occasion. My aunt, my dad's younger sister lived in an apartment building that backed to ours. When she came over for dinner, or whatever, dad always walked her back home across the alley that separated the two back to back apartment buildings. He always opened the little drawer in the table by the door and slipped his blackjack in his back pocket, and took a big flashlight in his hand. Back then, blackjacks seemed to be almost common. They were sold in stores with little problems, and came in a die variety of sizes and shapes. Long ones, short ones, round ones, and flat ones.

Mr. Briscoe, who lived downstairs was a TV repair man. Back in those days TV's had tubes and you could open up the back and figure out what needed to be replaced. M.r Briscoe had a tool kit he'd carry around that had testers and things to figure our what was bad. When he went out, a lot of times he was carrying a hammer handle, with the slim end the hammer head was supposed to goon, shoved down in his waistband. Since most people didn't have credit cards in those days, they paid in cash for things, so it was a summed that a repair guy had cash on him. The time a couple of inner city types tried to roll Mr. Briscoe, he ended up pullng his wood hammer handle and beating the ever loving stuffing out of the two would be robbers. Mr. Briscoe being a hefty built Irish guy bigger than the average bear, I wonder if he really needed the hammer handle.

But what I'm getting at, in my long winded way is, I never remember people carrying a knife as a weapon, or even seeing knives sold that were weapons, when I was a kid. Except of course for the James Dean wannabe's who had to have an e-tal-ian switch blade to be cool. If a weapon was needed, and a gun was not in the cards, some sort of impact tool was used or carried to be used just in case. Blackjacks, hammer handles, piece of pipe, even a cane. We had one neighbor who carried a silver headed walking stick that had a beautiful horses head on a knobby blackthorn shaft, and he openly called it his head bopper.

But there was no tactical knives, no lock blades, just normal little slip joit jackknives that people carried to cut string, open packages, whatever. Now we have multiple display cases of knives that look like they were designed by a Hollyweird special effects person to look dangerous with weird shaped blades and special black coatings. I remember when Buck came out with the to be famous folding hunter. Even that was touted as a hunting knife. It was adapted by construction workers, soldiers, and then bikers. It became the ubiquitous knife of the 1970's.

So what sociological event/events took place in the 1980's and 90's that the tactical knife became such a big deal? I confess that I don't really understand the current knife craze toward movie looking knives that seem to be getting more and more outlandish in design, and seem to be of little use for real world use. It seems to my thinking that any impact tool is way ahead if a knife. If I do have someone on me, I'd think that a blunt force truma injury would be more effective faster than a stab wound. I've heard that sometimes a stab wound is not even felt until after the fight. Andif I'm facing a knife wielding criminal, the very last thing I want is a knife. I ain't Jm Bowie, and have zero interest in trading slashes with some nut job. Having seen one real knife fight in my life, that was enough for me. The two GI's that got into it with Buck knives over one shorting the other in a sale of some pot, made the case against knife fights for me. One died, the other was in critical condition, and after he was well enough to leave the hospital, his next station was Ft. Levenworth for a long stay. They brought in a water truck to hose down the pavement where the fight took place.

It's too bad they made blackjacks ileagl. I remember a store that used be down on th corner where they sold some. Beautiful work, sometimes with two different color leathers braided in it. And I remember my dad saying how a broken collar bone or a smashed elbow ends a fight immediately. Then I think how it took 52 stab wounds to bring down Victor Frykowski in the Manson killing. Two of Manson's followers testified as to how Victor would go down and kept fighting, so they had to keep stabbing him.

I guess looking around that knife shop at all the tactical trendy knives, I wonder if there's something I'm missing because I'm dated, or are lots of people fooling themselves?

Carl.
 
I'm not really sure I get your point... you went into a knife shop and saw some kid gawking at some ridiculous knives. That's what knife shops are for.

Knives aren't the best weapons but they're legal in one form or another across the USA, they're light, and they're the handiest thing you can put in your pocket.

Next time you're in that shop you should handle some of the Benchmade or Spyderco knives. Pocket knives have come a long way in the last 20 years, they are now finely crafted, well designed tools with the cleverest of locking mechanisms and ergonomics.
 
Really interesting post.

The illegality of blackjacks is something I don't understand.

To me, my pocket knife is equal parts tool and weapon. I make sure it's readily accessible, I practice with it and I don't play with it in public. I use it to do little tasks with, and it cuts up cheese and salami at lunch. The first thing I did when I bought it was strip the tacticool black coating off the blade.

I'm a graduate student, so much of my time is spent on a "weapon free" campus. My pocket knife falls within what they allow.

As for impact weapons, I think I'd have a very hard time justifying anything effective as a tool that I need on campus. I have enjoyed following the various stick threads, but for me a stick is generally an inconvenient encumbrance.

It's been interesting seeing perceptions shift in the students around me. The first time I pulled out my knife to cut something in company there was a definite shock that I had it (the pocket clip had been visible to them for four months already :rolleyes:), but over time people stopped so much as blinking. Last semester a guy started who is constantly playing with his knife in public - nobody seemed to find it offensive except me!
 
My cane is in my hand every minute I'm on my feet, and even when I'm sitting down, it's always quicker to reach than my knife. And if I ever should happen to travel by air, well . . .
 
I greatly enjoyed reading Carl's comments, and my answer is.... yes to both aspects (I'm a bit dated myself...).

Since I was forced to learn about weapons and their various uses over the years I also learned to spot who was or was not armed (not just firearms, but weapons or potential weapons of every sort). I also encouraged young officers I worked with to read periodicals like the old Soldier of Fortune (or whatever is current today). Nice to know what any young'un could buy or use or think about using when you're on the street since some weapons aren't exactly obvious....

I also learned to watch very carefully how individuals reacted when I first approached them (both as a cop and years later as just some old guy....). Almost everyone carrying a blade as a weapon gave away that fact and actually showed you exactly where their blade was by their body language or by actually moving their dominant hand to where the weapon was being carried.... even when there was nothing particularly threatening occurring.

Funny the things you learn in life.
 
I think your experience in Panera Bread is a good example of one of the advantages of knives as a weapon--intimidation. And that was just an Opinel if I recall correctly.

The best weapons can keep you from having to fight in the first place.
 
From what I can puzzle out of the original post I think the question is, "When did we see "tactical" knives become so popular"?

The '70's were the beginning of the appeal with boot knives and fighters like those from Gerber, but the first recognizable tactical folder came from Bob Terzuola in the early '80s and Ernie Emerson in the mid '80s. From then on the popularity of these knives grew.

As to the supposed absence of lock blade knives, lockback folders date from as far back as the 15thC. More commonly in the U.S. they became popular late in the 19thC and very popular in the mid 20th. The first U.S. patterns were common slip joints that had the back spring and lock incorporated.
 
Last edited:
As far as legality goes; most states have sections of their "prohibited to carry" statutes that include such things as blackjacks, brass knuckles, coshs, "slung shots", and the like..
Knife regulations tend to be all over the place, but most prohibit "daggers and dirks" which is generally felt to mean knives intended for combat, and various kinds of "automatic" knives which is likely a holdover from 1950s "switchblade" use by "juvenile delinquents"....

In cases where we police are undecided, the knife in question is normally presented to the prosecuting attorney for an opinion....Which is normally made on the grounds of how scary it looks.
As well as the individual's purpose, police record, circumstances, etc.

As far as the usefulness of the knife as a weapon... I've said before that the knife can be an effective weapon, especiallly in trained hands, but not always a "good" weapon.
You have, in producing a knife, introduced a "dangerous and deadly" weapon into whatever equation is going down. If you are justified in using deadly force, you may be OK.
But... Knives are not as socially acceptable as guns... They are the weapons of thugs and ethnic groups and "those" people.... Not nice citizens.
And why are you carrying that nasty-looking "tactical" knife anyway, Mr. Jones?

We know of a young man who at the age of 15 killed another kid with a normal little pocketknife as the other kid (a bully) was beating him up. A lucky stab. Or unlucky... He was convicted of homicide as a juvenile and spent several years in detention and was essentially ruined for the rest of his life.
 
Like I said to our member Nem recently, some features you encounter on a knife are the equivalent of a baboon's butt.

However the upside of that is that a lot of companies who have ridden the trend of selling to people who always want the newest, deadliest looking knives, have also popularized pretty awesome materials and design advancements that, if we're honest, are also "better" in many ways (safer, stronger, more cost-effective, and better at their intended task) for reasons Not Tactical.

Some, but not all, of those companies make knives that are not particularly tactical or gimmicky, and I like to think that's worth some of the goofiness of their more outlandish models.
wn tha
Then again, some of it is crap.

Regarding what attitude people have toward a weapon - people in the 50s also thought segregation was a good idea, women should stay at home regardless of their wishes, etc. I no more let anyone's arbitrary, personal belief or attitude then (or now) determine what I do or own in self defense than in any other way.
 
Last edited:
I think your experience in Panera Bread is a good example of one of the advantages of knives as a weapon--intimidation.
Yea, intimidate, it's a good reason to carry. If the other guy pulls a knife though I'm running if at all possible. I once worked with a guy who was an ex bouncer, a bit of a thug, and he was scared of knives. Pull a knife on him, when he's not bouncing, and it will save you from a severe beating.
Also if someone starts choking you, especially from behind, it could save your a$$.
 
Of course, there are also those individuals who are not intimidated at the sight of a knife, but instead become enraged.....
The old, "if someone pulls a knife on me, they better kill me...” idea you hear now and then.
Often bluster, but not always.
 
I think the attraction (for some people) to knives as weapons stems from the fact that a person need not be physically strong or nimble to use a knife to deadly effect. In that regard, it's not so different from a gun, in the sense that if someone can connect with their target, it can eliminate a threat without an opponent's superior physical condition becoming a factor. In reality, a knife in untrained hands is just as dangerous to the wielder and innocent bystanders as it is to an assailant, but if that assailant is a petty criminal who isn't willing to risk injury or death, an old lady flailing a knife around just might be too much risk for the reward.

For myself personally, the role of a knife in a self-defense situation is first to deter. I'm not a big guy, certainly not up to the task of going toe-to-toe with someone who for whatever reason decides to give me the beating of a lifetime. If by pulling a knife, I convince them to look for trouble elsewhere, then that knife did its job. There are very few blunt weapons that I feel I could use as effectively, that I could carry in my pocket, and none that would be nearly as versatile as a knife in my opinion.
 
Inazone,
Your summary is accurate. A deterrent is the key. An overwhelming show of force will diffuse many confrontations, especially by weak minded and weak willed predators.

Jim
 
For myself personally, the role of a knife in a self-defense situation is first to deter.

I would argue that for the use you describe, effective movement or verbal strategies (preferably both) would do the trick even better than a knife.

There is a lot of legal discussion here on this topic and I find it almost self-evident; and frankly I'm surprised you don't. The argument goes something like: you can either run, or defend yourself, or stand there, but don't stand there when you could have run away and draw a deadly weapon - legally that's tantamount to expressing intent to use it, so you are putting yourself in a catch-22 if you come under scrutiny: why pull it to deter someone if you had the luxury of standing there with it; clearly there was a better (legally speaking) course of action. But I don't intend to go that route in this post.

What is needed here is a working understanding of initiative, which can be understood as a result of opposing OODA loop circuitry.

Essentially you have two people cycling through different phases of decision making (which is not occurring in a vacuum of course) and generally, in fact almost always, one will have initiative, or be closer to executing an effective (in terms of offense generally, or furthering the aim of gaining even more initiative or decision-making-time) strategy. Or both can lack initiative. Both parties can't simultaneously possess initiative, by definition, if they are opposed (fighting).

So, the problem with any deterrent strategy using a knife is, you are attempting to offer information to someone in a passive manner. It's a bluff would be another way of saying it, but bluff is really the wrong word since it's premised on willingness to use the knife; in this case the problem is more one of timing; it's a posturing strategy then. You are essentially feeding someone information in hopes that they make a certain decision, but worse, you are pausing your own OODA loop unless you have a very specific trigger for when to use the weapon.

A gun is a better "wait a sec before you use it" weapon for several good reasons:

1) More distance = more time for guy to decide "no thanks"
2) More efficacy = less risk from pulling and holding for whatever reason (remember we are leaving legal risk by the wayside for this post)
3) Due to 1 and 2 , specific triggers can be built in more easily e.g. he reaches into his waistband so you fire. With a knife by contrast, the person's behavior will be far less predictable and you would have less time to react and execute a triggered action.

That isn't to say brandishing a gun is a preferred deterrent strategy, but in contrast, the knife is ineffective outside of contact distance, and is slow to work. If he doesn't respond in quite the way you hope, you have:

1) Spoon-fed him information relevant to him (fulfilling his first two O's - the "D" is not always rational you know, or predictable)
2) Paused at "A" yourself (or, best case, restarted at the first "O" since you obviously can't use the knife without further developments... or you would have)

That's called conceding initiative. Initiative is what wins fights.

Contrast that with moving (you cause him to REorient as he must consistently observe new visual information, and you are creating distance and/or time, to boot!) or using an effective verbal strategy (which allows you to more effectively Observe and Orient and make a better, more tactically sound Decision and Act on it, PLUS you can also actively disrupt his OODA loop, too).

BTW, I am not asking to debate this here, but this is also my same argument against the "passive deterrent" argument put forth by open-carry advocates.
 
Last edited:
I really did enjoy the post by the OP. It reminded me alot of a short story by Robert Ruark titled "Same knife different boy". From the book the old mans boy grows older 1957.

I don't think all youth is fascinated by the tacticool movement. I do understand that some of these knives do have some advantage in a defensive situation. I do not question that at all. Its like anything they are the latest greatest must have toys. My self I prefer a sodbuster heck I carry a pocket watch and I'm 34. I can't look at a cold steel ad without rolling my eyes. Doesn't mean they are not decent knives just not my style. For now my kids are more impressed with a case trapper or stockman than a Gil Hibbden uber fantasy death knife. Kinda hope it stays that way.
 
Last edited:
Nice selection Nem. They have very modern materials but a very usable blade shape and handle design. Perhaps a little tactical but mostly a practicle design that could handle several task. No arguments from me.

Oh and happy birthday.
 
I wonder if the increase of tactical knives is simply an attempt at adaptation to an increasingly hostile legal climate. For many people who either don't notice or lack skill with "improvised weapons," a folder is one of the only options you have left. Some consumers live in states with no CHP, are under 21, are felons or a firearm is simply outside their price range (both up front cost and cost of practice). Those blackjacks that were so popular "back in the day" are all illegal now. And pepper spray gets such a bashing from gun people that it's spilled out of politics and many who don't know any better now think it's useless.

I'm astounded by how many...shall I call them, "untrained" (i.e. people with extremely poor understanding of defense) I hear talking about how they carry a pocket knife as their sole strategy for self-defense. Recently my best friend's wife showed me her Ka-Bar Dozier and explained to me that she carries it because of "crazy people" she encounters at the grocery store. My eye started twitching at that one, but I did calmly explain the problems with this strategy, and gave her my spare Fox canister.
 
Since the thread is titles knives as weapons. I guess this is okay.

I read time and time again how the novice untrained in defense would not understand this or that. In more threads by more posters than I care to recall.

I do not in anyway discount the importance of training in self defense. However I think to many people take a few classes and have this false sense of security in themselves. I also know a bunch of working class folks with no formal training that carry these wimpy pocket knives or a small sheath knife. These folks use their knives time and time again each and every day. From farmers cutting sacks of feed or seed or twine to professional meat cutters. Heck I know a couple guys who have worked for years in a slaughter house. Almost all of them have no formal training in knife skills or martial arts of any kind.

I also know several people who went to this or that institute of krambit uber knife death school. All but a couple of them remind me of Jim Carrey. "Let me show you this really cool move I learned at karate. But you have to come at me like this". You take most of these so called experts who have trained in the theroy of defensive skills and fighting. Put them against the guy who has worked in a slaughter house all his life or the guy who hangs drywall and uses a tiny little utility knife hundreds of times a day. Training or not it was nice knowing you.

I have taken alot of formal defensive training. However I feel much better with the knife I have used literally thousands of times in everyday task. Its not tacticool at all but it becomes an extension of your hand. Theory can't give you that; it comes from doing it. Which is hard with the tactical knife that is illegal to carry. Just my 2 cents and rant.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Thor.

Glistam, we might disagree on a point or two,
but I think you're onto something there.

JB, too. Especially this part.

I have taken a lot of formal defensive training. However, I feel much better with the knife I used literally thousands of times in everyday tasks. Its not tacticool at all, but it becomes an extension of your hand. Theory can't give you that; it comes from doing it.
 
I was allowed to take my ka-bar hunter in checked baggage as a fishing knife into St.kitts when I lived there, I then turned it into a spear for a HD weapon(until I scrounged a pipe)
 
Knife

I live in California in a county where I would have to contribute very generously to the sheriffs re-election campaign in order to get a CCW. I'm a sales rep and I make sales calls in some of the worst parts of Oakland and Richmond. I carry pepper spray in my folder with my price list and I keep a little Kershaw Leek on my belt. It's quick to open and very sharp. I hope I never have to use it.
 
As far as legality goes; most states have sections of their "prohibited to carry" statutes that include such things as blackjacks, brass knuckles, coshs, "slung shots", and the like..
Knife regulations tend to be all over the place, but most prohibit "daggers and dirks" which is generally felt to mean knives intended for combat, and various kinds of "automatic" knives which is likely a holdover from 1950s "switchblade" use by "juvenile delinquents"....

In cases where we police are undecided, the knife in question is normally presented to the prosecuting attorney for an opinion....Which is normally made on the grounds of how scary it looks.
As well as the individual's purpose, police record, circumstances, etc.

As far as the usefulness of the knife as a weapon... I've said before that the knife can be an effective weapon, especiallly in trained hands, but not always a "good" weapon.
You have, in producing a knife, introduced a "dangerous and deadly" weapon into whatever equation is going down. If you are justified in using deadly force, you may be OK.
But... Knives are not as socially acceptable as guns... They are the weapons of thugs and ethnic groups and "those" people.... Not nice citizens.
And why are you carrying that nasty-looking "tactical" knife anyway, Mr. Jones?

We know of a young man who at the age of 15 killed another kid with a normal little pocketknife as the other kid (a bully) was beating him up. A lucky stab. Or unlucky... He was convicted of homicide as a juvenile and spent several years in detention and was essentially ruined for the rest of his life.
To that end I carry the larger size Swiss army knife. I'm in the woods enough and want something a bit more substantial in case I'm suddenly lost. I also carry a whistle, small flashlight and a bic lighter. The choice for staying with a Swiss army knife was that should I ever be frisked it wouldn't be as likely preceived as a weapon but a tool. Also at work we have a no weapons policy and this knife will likely be ok whereas the same size blade in a tactical folder will get me in trouble. Could I use this knife in a pinchnasma weapon? Sure. However I would by a long shot much rather have a 20" stick or umbrella as a weapon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top