LA Times article on CCW, 07/19/04

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gunsnrovers

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,476
Location
Lost Angeles
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-concealed19jul19,1,553148.story?coll=la-headlines-california


More Now Carry Guns
As security fears increase, police and sheriffs have issued 28% more permits for concealed weapons statewide since 2000.
By Daryl Kelley, Times Staff Writer

The number of California residents who can legally carry a gun has surged 28% since 2000, reaching the highest level in decades following a spike in applications after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, new state figures show.

California sheriffs and police chiefs had issued more than 45,000 concealed weapon permits by the end of 2003, up about 10,000 in three years, including steep increases in Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura counties, according to the state Department of Justice.

Of California's 58 counties, only Yolo had a decline in weapon permits after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon near Washington.

"There was a big spike after 9/11, where people felt they should protect themselves better," said San Bernardino County Sheriff Gary Penrod, who granted nearly 500 new permits in 2001 and 2002. "And if a responsible citizen feels they need a gun and can demonstrate that need, I don't have any problem in giving it to them."

California law allows police agencies to grant concealed weapon permits for "good cause" if residents have clean criminal and mental health records and pass a basic firearms course. "Good cause" is determined by the police agencies.

Of the state's nine counties with more than 1 million people, San Bernardino had the highest rate of concealed weapon permits last year. Its 2,575 licenses equate to nearly 1.4 permits per 1,000 residents compared with a statewide norm of 1.25.

Rural Modoc County in the northeast corner had the state's highest rate of licensees: 35 per 1,000. Kern County issued the most permits, more than 4,300. San Francisco County had the lowest number, with 10 permits.

Indeed, the rate of people who legally carry weapons on their bodies, in their purses or in their cars was generally lower in big cities, where police chiefs want the streets free of firearms. But it was high in the state's rural north and east, where the closest law enforcement officer is often many miles away. "People here feel it's their right to carry weapons, and I support them," said Sheriff Jim Pope of Shasta County, which last year had 3,361 permits, second highest in the state. "As sheriffs, we're kind of the mop-up behind people."

The comments of Pope and Penrod reflect one side of a nationwide debate about whether properly trained, law-abiding residents should have the right to carry weapons. In an increasing trend, 35 states have passed "shall carry" or "right-to-carry" laws that allow most residents to get weapon permits, although only a fraction of those who qualify apply.

Since 1996, academic studies have reached contradictory findings on whether violent crime falls when more people are allowed to carry weapons. Some concluded it did, others said it didn't. Law enforcement officials in California split along the same lines.

In Los Angeles County, the number of concealed weapon permits increased from 874 to 1,391 in three years, despite strict policies by the sheriff and Los Angeles police. The increase is attributed to higher rates in jurisdictions such as Culver City, El Monte, Palos Verdes Estates and San Fernando.

"With 10 million people and our demographics, the population is not one that would lend itself to all our citizens being armed and feeling safe about it," said Los Angeles County Undersheriff William Stonich.

That is why Sheriff Lee Baca has approved only 377 permits, in addition to nearly 500 for the county's reserve deputies, Stonich said. Of those 377, about three-fourths are held by judges, prosecutors, public defenders and retired federal agents. Only about 100 licensees are residents without law enforcement credentials, he said.

Baca and Los Angeles Police Chief William J. Bratton require applicants to prove a severe danger to themselves or their families that police cannot adequately address and that would be lessened by carrying a gun.

Sheriff's licensees include public officials, corporate executives, doctors, clergy, a USC professor, a garbage company boss, a casino operator, a Palmdale homemaker and a rabbi who heads a prominent Jewish organization.

Veteran Hollywood producer Jerry Weintraub has a license, as do "Lethal Weapon" director Richard Donner, action movie actor Steven Seagal and entertainer James Darren. Seagal testified against New York organized crime members in 2003.

Three Lancaster officials — Mayor Frank Roberts, recently retired City Manager James Gilley and Assistant City Manager Dennis Davenport — held permits, the sheriff reported. They did not return calls to discuss why they need to carry guns.

Former Long Beach City Manager James Hankla, whose permit expired last month, said he no longer needed to carry a gun. "While I was still a city manager, there were situations where I felt I had to be prepared to defend myself," he said. "You can go through a [city] agenda on a weekly basis and find enough topics that could cause folks to be unhappy."

Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael Antonovich, a longtime reserve police officer and a lieutenant colonel in the National Guard, also felt directly threatened and was granted a weapons permit, spokesman Tony Bell said.

Bratton has continued the restrictive policies of previous chiefs since his appointment in 2002, and only 22 permits are now outstanding, the department reports.

"Anything that puts guns on the street is not something he would support," police spokesman Lt. Art Miller said.

Los Angeles' policy was so restrictive in the early 1990s that a group of residents sued and gained a settlement that led to a couple of hundred permits, said plaintiff David Yochelson, an attorney.

Yochelson, chairman of a committee set up to screen applicants, holds one of the city's few gun permits, as do three others involved in the old lawsuit. But he said the city has since reverted to past ways and has been sued again.

"We're still fighting and still very disappointed that law-abiding citizens can't protect themselves lawfully," he said.

Yochelson cites a Hollywood Hills defense attorney, whose throat was cut, as a classic example of a resident who was threatened but could not get a gun permit until he survived an attack.

But some officials who favor tight weapon policies cite the case of actor Robert Blake, who is charged with using a handgun to kill his wife, Bonny Lee Bakley. At the time of the slaying in 2001, Blake held a concealed weapon permit from Culver City, where then-Chief Ted Cooke was known for issuing permits to celebrities and out-of-town applicants.

"I've never had a problem with someone misusing a gun," Cooke said when he retired last year. Culver City had 210 permits in 2003, and its per capita rate exceeded all other cities in Los Angeles County.

"We've tightened up this year; each chief establishes what is good cause," said Police Lt. Ed Baughan, who estimated that Culver City now has 170 permits. "But we wouldn't hesitate to issue one to someone who has a stalker issue, even though the stalker hadn't made a death threat."

State law changed in 1999, allowing police chiefs to issue permits only to residents in their jurisdictions. Permits dropped by more than 5,000 that year, but quickly rebounded and have risen sharply since then, even in counties with reputations for strict weapon policies.

New sheriffs in Orange and Ventura counties, for example, have issued far more permits in recent years.

During his campaign for office in 1998, Orange County Sheriff Michael S. Carona called for issuing more weapon permits to people who transport large sums of money or other valuables. By the end of his first year, Carona had signed off on 482 permits, compared with 308 the previous year by his predecessor, Brad Gates.

The numbers have continued to rise. State figures show weapon permits for all Orange County jurisdictions increased from 571 in 2000 to 1,225 last year, with the Sheriff's Department accounting for the bulk of the licenses.

In Ventura County, which had 348 permits when Sheriff Bob Brooks took office in 1998, licenses had climbed to 715 by last year, the state reported.

Brooks believes extra permits make his county — already the safest urban area in the West — even safer, because only upstanding residents receive permits. He cited Texas, Florida and Arizona where, he said, liberalized gun-carrying policies have led to less violent crime.

"We've never had a problem with misuse, and we have had cases where someone would have been victimized if they had not been able to defend themselves," Brooks said. "Just the appearance of the sidearm was enough to stop the attacks."

He didn't set out to increase the number of permits, Brooks said, but when people with good character and a need for a weapon applied, he was happy to comply.

"The trend that was really noticeable was after Sept. 11," he said. "People were really more concerned about their safety."
 
I think Jim March is fixing to take care of the problem in LA and Lee Beca. Nobody except his buddies gets a permit? Changes are coming to his little fifdom.
 
"Anything that puts guns on the street is not something he would support," police spokesman Lt. Art Miller said.

So, his officers hit the streets unarmed?

Oh, yeah I forgot, they're special
:rolleyes:
 
But some officials who favor tight weapon policies cite the case of actor Robert Blake, who is charged with using a handgun to kill his wife, Bonny Lee Bakley. At the time of the slaying in 2001, Blake held a concealed weapon permit from Culver City, where then-Chief Ted Cooke was known for issuing permits to celebrities and out-of-town applicants.

Yeah, we all know he wouldn't dare break the law by carrying the weapon to the scene of the murder illegally...errr...wait a minute. :rolleyes:
 
"With 10 million people and our demographics, the population is not one that would lend itself to all our citizens being armed and feeling safe about it," said Los Angeles County Undersheriff William Stonich.
And whatever is that supposed to mean, Mr. Stonich? :scrutiny:
 
On the whole, this is a fairly balanced article...
Kern County issued the most permits, more than 4,300. San Francisco County had the lowest number, with 10 permits.
..but if this doesn't raise some red flags in peoples' minds, they are not paying attention.

Go Jim!
 
I love how they pose the issue as not putting a lot of guns on the streets in cities. Gee, how often is someone shooting an illegally ccw'd gun in the surrounding area of LA? Morons!

They continue to disarm those who need it the most. What is it they don't understand? How many ccw holders, aside from Blake who by the way isn't convicted yet, have caused a problem from law enforcement? Baca is lacking a pursuasive argument, and apparently half a brain!
 
That was my thought as well. The article itself seems balanced. The information/statistics in the article is the disturbing part.
 
"And if a responsible citizen feels they need a gun and can demonstrate that need, I don't have any problem in giving it to them."

How KIND of you! If the serf comes begging, hat in hand, and YOU think he has a good reason, you 'don't have a problem' ALLOWING the serf to have the proper tools to defend their life.

The gulf between his thinking and my own is staggering!
 
I didn't know they could get that much information about permit holders in CA. Seems like a decent story considering what paper it was published in. I am interested to hear Jim March's comments.
 
That has to be one of the most balanced articles I've read in the La Times. I don't think it's perfectly balanced because the author doesn't point out some of the falacies such as how many violent crimes occur in those areas despite the facts that the people aren't licensed to carry concealed weapons.

However, it's better than I've come to expect from the LA times.
 
"Demographic"?

:scrutiny:

Oh boy are we gonna have fun with THAT.

We're gonna make the barsterds choke on it.

All: the LA Times has gathered only VERY sketchy info compared to what's needed.

Right now, further digging under the Public Records Act is on hold until November. At that point, a state Constitutional amendment (SCA1) is extremely likely to pass, adding "teeth" to the PRA which don't exist now. Agencies in violation (which on CCW data is now 70% or so, highest in the worst areas such as LA) will then have to pay triple attorney's fees and possible damages for civil rights violations.

This enhancement to the PRA will go to a public vote in November, having already cleared the legislature by 2/3rds. Backed by the LA Times, Knight-Ridder and other major media companies, it's scheduled to get free advertising and is considered a blow-out shoe-in for passage.

So we wait. Because this winter is going to be the winter of a LOT of discontent for crooked sheriffs like Baca.

The report on what's really going on in the top 15 or 20 worst jurisdictions will be ready by the deadline for new legislation in Feb. of '05. Failing that, it'll be used in court.

We will NOT need money for these PRAR suits once SCA1 passes, as the attorney fee tripler will net us contingency lawyers all over the state. I suspect many of the agencies will "roll over" once their county counsels are informed of the level of financial problem that wrongful non-compliance will cause.

Esp. when I warn them in county council meetings, personally.
 
I would have liked to have heard from Mack Whimbish, the Sheriff our of Kern County, on this article. Oh well. I wonder why the crime rate seems to be lower here in Kern County compared to the more urban counties. What a strange phenomenom. My guess is it is the water. Definetly not the fact that I have had a permit to carry concealed since I was 22 and so have 4500 other Kern County Residents.
 
Those numbers are meaningless.


Saying 90% increase sounds great until you learn that 90% increase on a lousy .00000000001% of a population (for example) is insignificant to the implied idea being expressed that there is a tremendous increase in permits being issued and that somehow effects the whole population. After all, the papers audience is virtually everyone in that area.


Also, even an increase of 50,000 permits in a region that has millions of people is totally insignificant. 50,000 permits can be easily dished out to state employees, officials, cops, celebrities, and of course - the rich.

Unfortunately, a woman in danger of rape does not count, since she does not fall into any of the above discriminatory categories for state acceptance and priveledge.


I personally know a man who has a handgun carry license in NYC. He is the most incompetant man on earth I know with a firearm. He has a .38spl. If I asked him right now what caliber his revolver is, he might not reply - since he isn't used to hearing it called a revolver, but as a "gun". Once I get passed the confusion on gun terminology, he still wouldn't be able to reply on what caliber it is.


This is the kind of idiocy that exists in gun-ban cities.


I should note that this man (isn't my friend directly, but is a family friend) is a rich businessman who makes contributions to his police dept and the police chief. He is not a suit and tie businessman, he owns a construction company and can hardly piece a sentance together. Money buys rights in elitist cities.
 
sometimes, i read these things, and i think:

you know, for the la times, this was a halfway decent effort at presenting both sides.

seriously, better than i would have expected. maybe i'm an optimist tonight... or maybe i'm extremely pessimistic about how i normally expect newspapers to write.
 
With ten million people and our demographics..................


I don't know about you, but the undersheriff's undertone sounds a bit racist to me.:scrutiny:
That comment is a little unethical and certainly unbecoming of someone who is SUPPOSED to apply the law equally and equitably to the people he serves.
 
San Francisco County had the lowest number, with 10 permits.

Basically, SF is the stop and rob capital of California..

If I were gay, I'd take note of those numbers..

Gay Bashing + 10 permits only = a lot of people gettin' hurt..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top