Double Naught Spy
Sus Venator
There, see? No Supreme Court needed to "interpret" the Constitution. I was able to explain it to you without any interpretation. All one need do is follow the rules of grammar.
But Woody, you have no power under the Constitution to interpret the Constitution, which is exactly what you did by trying to explain it (which you are not granted the power to do either, I might add) following the rules of grammar. There is no mention within the Constitution that grammar be used to explain or interpret it, you have a tautological problem.
Last edited: