Does anyone have the real scoop on shooting lead from a Glock? Yes, no, OK, better accuracy with conventional rifleing, etc, etc?
I shoot mostly a mild lead load in my 9mm's that is very accurate (3.2 Titegroup with a Lee 125 2R round nose). I get 970 fps, and it functions all of my 9mm actions, and it doesn't lead the barrel.
I don't have a Glock in my colliction yet, but if I did it would have to shoot lead. Yes, I know Bar-Sto barrels are available, but I have an Idea that the factory polygon is perfectly capable of shooting lead. My guess is that the factory covers their tail by advising against lead. I don't have a pressure test barrel, but I would think chamber pressures do increase having to push a bullet down a heavily leaded barrel. I have been told Glocks have a slightly larger than average unsuported area at the back of the case, which many blame for the well publicised Glock KB. But then again, the Browning Hi Power also has a fairly large unsupported area of the case as well, and it doesn't get the bad press the Glock does.
Just wondering?
I shoot mostly a mild lead load in my 9mm's that is very accurate (3.2 Titegroup with a Lee 125 2R round nose). I get 970 fps, and it functions all of my 9mm actions, and it doesn't lead the barrel.
I don't have a Glock in my colliction yet, but if I did it would have to shoot lead. Yes, I know Bar-Sto barrels are available, but I have an Idea that the factory polygon is perfectly capable of shooting lead. My guess is that the factory covers their tail by advising against lead. I don't have a pressure test barrel, but I would think chamber pressures do increase having to push a bullet down a heavily leaded barrel. I have been told Glocks have a slightly larger than average unsuported area at the back of the case, which many blame for the well publicised Glock KB. But then again, the Browning Hi Power also has a fairly large unsupported area of the case as well, and it doesn't get the bad press the Glock does.
Just wondering?