Lee's "Modern Reloading" looks like a great reference

Status
Not open for further replies.

Run&Shoot

Member.
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
664
Location
Oregon
I just started reading through Richard Lee's second edition of Modern Reloading.

It looks pretty complete with complete reloading instructions, bullet casting info, and extesnive load data. It is a much thicker book than even the Speer or Nosler manuals. As others have posted, yes, it does have a lot of Lee equipment promotion. But hey, it is his company, that is the equipment he knows and loves best and if you own Lee equipment or want to know more about it then this is a great reference.

I currenly use the Lee Challenger press and am going to try the Factory Crimp Die as a separate die step. Most of my other equipment has been RCBS and Hornady mostly because that is what is sold at local store. I have to admit I was a little put off by the recent spat of postings from Mr. Lee about a product refund for another member a while ago on the forum, but I also know how horrible email/forums are for discussing such issues. He probably could have handled it more gracefully, but hey, I am not going to judge a company solely on one Internet thread. So far his equipment has worked fine for me and I enjoy his writing style and information in the manual.

Some of the things I like about the book so far:

* Pretty complete loading data as it is compiled form all the powder manufacturers and includes one of the best listgs for cast bullets.

* Personal style: Richard Lee obviously speaks form the heart and loves his business and the hobby of reloading. I have never read a manual that so well expresses the sheer fun of operating your own little manufacturing plant and working with precision tools.

* Lots of background on not just what Lee tools do and how to use them, but the history behind them, why and how they came about and have been refined.

* He makes a good case for volume measuring versus weight measuring of powder. Most people I know use a powder measure which is a volume method. They calibrate it against a scale because all data usually is given in grains of powder. But if we are going to end up using a volume type of device anyway, why not just start with load data in a standard measurement (Lee uses cc)? I give him kudos for breaking out of the weight mindset and promoting a scientific rational and method for volume based measurement of powder. He is right that the markings on my RCBS micrometer measure are arbitrary and it would be helpful if it was in something like hundredths of a cc or something.

* Listing of cartridges is more extensive than any other manual I have seen (Speer, Lyman, Nosler, Hornady, Hodgdon new and old, Accurate, etc.). Everything from severl .17 cal to the 50 BMG

* Each cartridge typically has several bullet weights, almost as many cast as jacketed, and usually special situations (Gold Dot and XTP, etc.). Each bullet weight usually has at least a dozen or more powders listed. A detailed drawing with dimensions is provided for each cartridge including useful case capacity in cc.

* Each listing has starting and max weights of powder, velocity, pressure, min OAL, volume equivalent and specs for the Lee scoops and Auto Disk measure. Some even have conversion factors for figuring the changes in pressure and velocity by each grain reduction in the powder. Great for figuring reduced loads. I have not seen this capability in any other manual.

* He is honest about not needing a ton of equipment. Other manufacturers may promote additional tools with varying emphasis on how important it is to start nano-measuring or nano-trimming, etc. I think Mr. Lee does a good job about imparting practical advice as to what is a good balance between usefula dn superfolous. For instance, is primer flash hole deburring really necessary (he thinks not as most cases are well made and do not require it). Also, many shooters are not trying to milk the last .10 inch of accuracy from their loads and would like an honest assessment whether another tool and loading step is really worth the expense and effort.

Anything I don't like? Not really. I found his product discussions more as a man in love with a hobby and proud of his company and thrilled by innovation with an eye toward provding quality equipment at an affordable cost.

I had already ordered a Lee Hand Press and FCDs. After reading this I might give some other Lee products a try such as the dippers, some dies if I can't locate my .40 S&W ones soon, and a case trimmer if I ever get around to that step.

I also like the Lyman, Speer and Nosler manuals a lot, but the Lee manul is now on my must have list for recommending to newbies. The new Annual format of the Hodgdon manual disapponints me, but I am willing to try it for a while and see how it works out over the years. It used to have lots of good reloading instructions and now just has articles. It used to have listings for most powder manufacturers and now just has Hodgdon. The best would be if they publish the book format every 5-10 years and use the annual magazine format for in-between updates.

Anyway you cut it reloading is fun and thaks to Mr. Lee for contributing his knowledge and enthusiasm to the "body of knowledge."
 
Modern Reloading

+1 on Richard Lee's book, 2nd. Ed. A great innovator has shared some of his thoughts with us here. I really enjoyed reading your post.

Have fun loading with your Lee gear--the dies are the best value going and you will love the Factory Crimp die!
 
+1 on the book and the dippers. I routinely use them after I have found an average for the powder and dipper I'm using. It never hurts to double check other people's numbers.
 
dracphelan> It never hurts to double check other people's numbers.<
__________________
+1
Always check other peoples numbers regardless. Just to be extra safe. Friend or otherwise.:rolleyes:
 
The Lee book is a great primer for those who want to get a good idea of what reloading entails. I highly recommend it and the price is very reasonable for such a comprehensive volume.
 
Only downside is that he does not state barrel length in the data.

Yeah, it is frustrating when manuals leave that kind of info out. I've even seen one that didn't list the OAL that was used, just the max for the cartridge.

Overall Lee's data tables are pretty good, but that's why we *need* a dozen manuals! And why I need to get a chrony...
 
If I had only one reloading handbook, Lee's would be it.

As it is, I think I have maybe 10 or so.
 
Ready to Reload

My friend gave me his Lee Pro 1000 and the .38/.357 dies.

I have his primers, his collection of various bullets, lots of casings, and a pound of Titegroup. I bought a Lee scale and a micrometer.

I'm going to start with .38 Sp.

I've rehearsed with the press and checked all adjustments. I'm sure I know what the press is doing, but to be careful, I'll be loading one-at-a-time until I absolutely know what I'm doing.

Now, I need your help. I've read Lee's book--and I've read his auto-disc and weight vs volume info. Also, I've read his chart info for .38 Special 158gr bullets and Titegroup powder. This is where I don't get it.

With a 158 grain lead bullet and Titegroup, Lee lists 3.2 starting grains/ .27cc/ .27 Autodisc for .38 Special.

The smallest disc cavity I have is .30.

What do I do now? Do I try .30, pour the powder from the casing onto the scale? Starting weight is 3.2 grains.

Did Lee design in enough safety leeway so that the .30 cavity is the one to use?

I'm really am a reloading newbie. Do I have the right idea here?
 
Most, if not all of Lee's data is a bit on the light side. Make sure you calibrate your scale to "0" before you weigh based on volume. It is possible for it to be off that much +/- .3 of a grain due to mis calibration.

The starting load of 3.2 grains utilizing a .27 cc would require a bar measurer, but the 3.5 grain threshold utilizing the .3 cc autodisk still will fall in the "light" load catagory and not max. 3/10ths of grain is not going to be very noticable.

I have found that using the Lee Auto Disk to be very consistant, but when I do my figuring to come up with the proper cavity side, I always seem to come up with a cavity size larger than what the chart says after weighing.

Using Lee's VMD figure for Titegroup of .08475 times the amount of grains should give you the volume in cc's. But, when I run the corresponding cavity based on the cc's, then weigh the results, I have consistantly come up with a lower weight than expected. So my theory is, is that they must have figured in a fudge factor.
 
It is my guess that the formula in a 'very interesting article' in Lee's book is wrong, but it is what Speer used to dry lab thier fake start velocities in "Speer 12" and "Speer 13".

I once wrote to Lee Precision and told them that the book was in conflict with IMR data for 10mm.
LP wrote back saying to use the IMR data if there is a conflict.

At 05:27 PM 11/21/99 -0800, you wrote:

>>... on the 10mm loads I see IMR's
>>website shows 9.8gr as a max load for 800X powder and 155 gr jacketed
>>bullet with 30,000 psi. "Modern Reloading" lists 11.6 gr of 800X with
>>32,900 psi. This is allot of extra powder for very little increase in
>>pressure. Am I missing something?
>>Clark...
>>
>>Thanks for the notification, I'll check into it. If I don't advise

otherwise, use the more current (the IMR website data) as maximum.

Patrick

I can see now th ere is also a conflict with 200 gr bullets.
 
A couple of alternatives

If the smallest disk is .30 cc and that is more than the .27 recommended you have a couple of other options.

First, I can appreciate the other's advice about not worrying too much about "going over max just a little. But since you are new to reloading that is a very bad habit of thinking to get into. Do you really need a max load? Even when I have all thedata and right components I see no reason for target practice to subject my guns to max pressures. I usually back off 5% or more.

One option would be to get the Lee Micro Adjust bar that allows you to use a micrometer adjutment instead of fixed disks.

Another option is to get the Perfect Powder meaasure which has a micrometer adjusment built in and we're only talking $20 - $30 bucks for free set up otherwise. You may need one of the adapters for the Perfect Powder measure to work on the 100, but still about another $5 - $10.

A third option is to buy a pound of another powder for about $15 - $20. Find a slower powder like Unique, AA5, etc. I think even Winchester 231 would be more like 5.0 grains.

Don't ignore max load data when you have at least three relatively cheap alternatives. Develop good thinking and habits now.
 
I probably use the Lee manual more than any other. The only problems I have with it is that the manual doesn’t tell whether load is from rifle or pistol (example .44 mag) and (I guess they do this just to be fair) it will list one group of powders for a jacketed bullet and another for the cast bullets. For a long time I wondered if the powders that were listed for jacketed could not be used with cast. Other than that great reference book.
RJ
 
I'm pretty sure that in the text Lee says that most rifles built for the .44 magnum really can't handle any more pressure than the modern revolvers, so there are not separate load tables for rifle versus handgun. There may be exceptions but I can understand his point of view that in general there is little to gain from having separate load tables. Practically speaking, how much more do you want to load a .44 than 22-24 gr of 296? Will you really get significantly more performance for the much greater increase in pressure, and how will you ensure that rounds loaded for rifle never get mixed into your revolver loads?
 
Lee's advertising turned me off early in the game. I never cared for the negative "attack" style ads I saw that dumped on the other guy's stuff. I especially remember the Speer vs. Lee Factory Crimp Die back-and-forth.

The few Lee products that I did use were of poor quality. The Lee progressive press comes to mind: low quality materials and construction, confusing directions, and an exceptionally rude fellow answering the phone.

Glad the manual is so helpful to you folks. I don't plan on giving it a chance. :cool:
 
Interesting--Speer attacked Lee and Speer turned out to be all wrong. Lee FCD led the way to a new level of ammo quality in the marketplace

Tens of thousands of Lee progressive presses operating in the market with no gripes. What is your actual experience? What press, what problems?

Ever had any problems with ant other gear? Just interested in why you are so negative.

What does this have to do with the manual?

Here is an extremely positive report on Lee equipment, just for example--

I use a Lee Classic Turret press that is rugged, easy to use and set up--I load 250 rounds per hour of solid ammo. I use the best buy in pistol dies on the market--Lee DeLuxe 4-die set that I can buy for less than $30. And the price of the press is so low it must be the best bargain since sliced bread.
 
Not looking to start a fight. If you use and like Lee stuff, more power to you.

Interesting--Speer attacked Lee and Speer turned out to be all wrong. Lee FCD led the way to a new level of ammo quality in the marketplace
Disagree. Have spent some time in the benchrest rifle game, and I promise you -- if you want to ruin your accuracy, you'll start by ruining your bullet. Or something like that.:)

Tens of thousands of Lee progressive presses operating in the market with no gripes. What is your actual experience? What press, what problems?
A friend bought a Pro 1000 on my recomendation, as he was looking for an inexpensive progressive. He couldn't make head or tales of the instructions so I came over to help him. As a Dillon user, I was initially dismayed to discover how much assembly was required out of the box, and felt that the quality of the casting and machining left a lot to be desired. I couldn't figure out the assembly instructions either (looking like something printed up by a highschooler on a 50 year old mimeograph machine) and so called Lee. The fellow at the help desk treated me like I was a complete idiot. Which I may well be, I guess, but it still doesn't seem like a winning customer service philosophy to me. < edit > I also seem to recall that the instructions themselves contained attacks on Lee's competitors. I thought it was pretty classless at the time, and have not seen anything to change my opinion.

And after we finally got the thing together, the silly little chain connecting the powder measure promptly broke and put the whole thing out of commision.

Ever had any problems with ant other gear? Just interested in why you are so negative.
Sure. Stuff breaks. Mostly when it does, I've been absolutely bowled over by the levels of service in the gun industry. Maybe that's partly why Lee underwhelms me. And I'm negative because I don't like Lee's advertising, I don't like their products, and I don't like their customer service.

What does this have to do with the manual?
Nothing. I just saw you folks painting Lee as a wonderful company and wanted to add my two cents. Sorry if I gored an ox.

Here is an extremely positive report on Lee equipment, just for example--

I use a Lee Classic Turret press that is rugged, easy to use and set up--I load 250 rounds per hour of solid ammo. I use the best buy in pistol dies on the market--Lee DeLuxe 4-die set that I can buy for less than $30. And the price of the press is so low it must be the best bargain since sliced bread.
I could be wrong about the company; maybe just have had a pretty outrageous run of bad luck with them. I'm glad their stuff is working out for you; it sure is inexpensive. I've just had great luck with Dillon, Redding, and to a slightly lesser extent, RCBS. I figure I'll stick with what I know. :)
 
.38 Special--any thoughts?

hmm, I don't know much about bench rest shooting, but is this guy's record with Lee dies any good?

"Robert Frey smashes world record with Lee Collet Dies

While competing in a regular sanctioned 1000 Yard Match on July 25th, 1993, Robert Frey established a new 1000 yard world record. We're honored he used the Lee Collet Die to reload his record setting ammunition.

World record breaker Robert Frey comments: "The Lee Collet Neck Sizing Die enables me to get top accuracy from my rifles (match and hunting). The design principle of sizing the case neck to a mandrel is unmatched for accuracy potential by any other dies. It is one of the best ways to make all of my rifles shoot their tightest groups."


What am I missing about Lee dies messing up accuracy?

It is also my experience that any die improperly adjusted/used can cause trouble. How many rounds have you loaded with the Lee FCD? What sort of statistical dispersion occurred with Speer bullets that you loaded and shot? How much did the groups deteriorate statistically?

Just interested.
 
I did a quick search for "Robert Frey 1000 yard record" and didn't come up with anything but Lee's site. So it's kind of hard to know what they're talking about.

But head down to a benchrest match and see what the competitors are using. They load right out of the back of their pick-ups so it's easy to watch. I'm sure someone, somewhere, has experimented with Lee dies for benchrest competition, but all I ever saw was folks using in-line dies with no crimp at all. Certainly if I had ever suggested to someone that they crunch the mouths of their $3 perfectly matched cases into their handmade J4-jacketed bullets -- just to see what happens, you know -- they'd probably have looked at me kind of funny, maybe asked me to stand somewhere else.

But that's neither here nor there. I really just use that whole episode as merely one example of what I consider to be a very negative approach to advertising. Other folks may enjoy seeing Lee badmouth their competitors. I view it as I do political "attack" ads: I don't want to hear about how bad the other guy is; I want to hear about what YOU can do for me. YMMV, as always.

How many rounds have you loaded with the Lee FCD?
Not a one.

What sort of statistical dispersion occurred with Speer bullets that you loaded and shot?
As compared with what?

How much did the groups deteriorate statistically?
About 150%, IIRC from Speer ads.

But hey, that's just Speer talking. Maybe Lee collet dies really ARE the greatest thing since sliced bread. Like I said, I just don't care for the way the company advertises, nor for the quality of their equipment, nor for their customer service.

At any rate, I can see that I've touched a nerve, and perhaps stepped into something sensitive that I'm not aware of, being a new guy here and all. If I've stepped out of line I apologize, and I really don't take issue with anything that's working for other handloaders. I just want folks reading here to know that not everybody agrees that Lee is a good company or sells a solid product.

Have a good evening! :)
 
Christ! I just read the sticky about manners.

"I've recently become alarmed that H&R has sometimes deteriorated into a bickerfest, with some notable examples of discourtesy. It seems that most of the really acrimonious disputes recently have concerned progressive reloading presses. Brand loyalty is one thing, but this has become reminiscent of Ford vs. Chevy, AR vs. AK, Glock plastic vs. 1911 steel, or .45 vs. .40 vs. 9mm. Maybe this is my fault for being too laid back, allowing things to take their own course, and simply deleting the few instances of unsuitable language."

"Hey - - In a technical forum, when a member asks a serious question, earnestly seeking knowledge, it is not appropriate to make cute little digs, or out-and-out attacks upon the other guy's apparent choice of loading gear. It makes sense to point out if the member is laboring under some false impression. It is only nice to indicate if Brand Z has a problem with the little safety chain breaking, or perhaps that Brand Q's pretty blue paint sometimes fades when exposed to sunlight."

I DID step into a fight with both feet and honestly didn't realize it, so offer my apologies to anyone I ticked off. As I said, I've got zero fight with anyone who's succesfully using their favorite brand of stuff.
 
I wouldn't sweat it, it's not like there is going to be riots in the streets over it. Everyone is entitled to thier opinion and mine is that I have had great luck with Lee reloading equipment. I'm not going to disagree with you on crimping bullets for bench resting matches but then again, I don't really know that Lee pushes the idea of crimping bullets in target rifles anyway. However, for the record, Speer has an opinion (owned by RCBS, so somewhat predictable) but Lee has an opinion too and it's laid out in their FAQ.

Not being a benchrester, I can't attest to brand loyalty but I have read that the collet dies are the choice of some - even over in line dies. The reason is that there is a mandrel in the middle as opposed to bushing so matter what the OD of the case neck is, the ID will be intiallay be .002 under the standard bullet diameter and then spring back .001 for a nice .001 hold. The bullet is seated with .001 of clearance and there is no crimp in the dead length bullet seater that comes with that set. It is also designed to bottom against the shell holder so that the reference would be identical for cases that are trimmed to the same length - the COL should be the same and that has been my experience. I have used a Sinclair press and Wilson hand dies and they are certainly nice, but my experience showed that they produced no more accurate ammo than collet dies. Granted, I'm not a bench rester and you could question my method, but if it was the same for both, then it's relative.

You may or may not be aware, but Lee has answered the "light" press complaint with two new cast iron and steel presses. Perhaps you may re-evaluate your assessment after using one, maybe not.

You're right in that everyone should be happy with their choice and mine is that Lee has given me the best value with the results I wanted. I hold nothing against anyone making a different choice as long as they are not speaking in generalities that they have no experience with. I haven't really found that in your arguments; I don't agree some of your assessment but that is the beauty of such forums, take what you want, disregard what you don't align with.
 
Well, I should have kept my mouth shut to begin with. I should have known that this would be a topic of contention, like wading into a discussion about the 9 mm by claiming that the .45 is way better, or something.

Off topic, the deal with the bench resters is that they're keeping a close eye on neck thickness. That is, they outside neck turn to a specified thickness, then select a bushing that results in the exact amount of bullet pull they are looking for. Some folks are even using "fitted necks" where the loaded case neck is only a few thousandths under chamber neck diameter. Supposedly this allows just enough neck expansion upon firing for the bullet to escape, but not enough to cause "permanent" neck expansion. Upside: no more case resizing. Down side: a speck of grit or unburned powder between case neck and chamber and pressure heads for the moon.

And yeah, I tried applying my inline tools to my factory rifles too, and it made no difference whatsoever. When the guns are only capable of one inch accuracy or whatever, I think we can pitch a lot of the benchrester's accuracy knowledge out the window. Heck, you could probably even use Lee stuff!:evil:
 
Welcome, brother .38 Special! Wasn't trying to fight, just figure out what was on your mind.

Nice to read about benchrest stuff since I don't know much. Shoot only pistol and shotgun.
 
No worries mate, thanks for the welcome, sorry about being a pr!ck.:p

The bench stuff was neat, but hanging out with engineers all day got kind of old. And as much as I love rifles, I can't shoot them worth a damn, so finally resigned myself to being a handgunner. My rifles now tend to have a decidedly British quality about them, and all have iron sights so as to give me a convenient excuse for missing so much!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top