Wichaka
Member
Okay, since there have now been 2 threads that have been hijacked and headed for this area of THR. Let's now discuss it in the area where it should have been all along.
What is the liability of info. going out on this and any other forum site?
I agree with Tuner in that we do need to watch what is being put out here for some pot-licker to twist and run off with..........
In another thread Jammer Six wrote;
Commanders, captains, chairmen and foremen have authority to accompany their responsibility, and the lack of that authority is significant, and removes the responsibility- legally and, in my book, morally.
Jammer I would agree with you totally in both our books, but in the world of L.E. work, we get sued for the term of "Failing to supervise". Therefore the lack of authority does not remove the responsibility.
Now don't get me wrong here. I'm agreeing that if you tell someone to do something and they go off and do something else, unless you're right there being the micro-mgr., its going to be tough to take the responsibility for that person's actions, and I don't think anyone should in that circumstance. But, as one of the above people or even acting like one of the above people, and you give advice that ain't the best..........now where does that put you?
So putting that in perspective as to info going out on this and other forums, if you are looked upon by others as a , for lack of a better term ".....self proclaimed pro 'smith" and you give someone advice on a procedure that is normally done by competant 'smiths, but the dude or dudess gets the procedure wrong and ends up hurting someone or themself.............where does that put things?
Where does that put the rest of us who won't do such a thing?
Kinda like, if you meet a bad Cop, they're all bad..........attitude.
Okay folks fire away............
What is the liability of info. going out on this and any other forum site?
I agree with Tuner in that we do need to watch what is being put out here for some pot-licker to twist and run off with..........
In another thread Jammer Six wrote;
Commanders, captains, chairmen and foremen have authority to accompany their responsibility, and the lack of that authority is significant, and removes the responsibility- legally and, in my book, morally.
Jammer I would agree with you totally in both our books, but in the world of L.E. work, we get sued for the term of "Failing to supervise". Therefore the lack of authority does not remove the responsibility.
Now don't get me wrong here. I'm agreeing that if you tell someone to do something and they go off and do something else, unless you're right there being the micro-mgr., its going to be tough to take the responsibility for that person's actions, and I don't think anyone should in that circumstance. But, as one of the above people or even acting like one of the above people, and you give advice that ain't the best..........now where does that put you?
So putting that in perspective as to info going out on this and other forums, if you are looked upon by others as a , for lack of a better term ".....self proclaimed pro 'smith" and you give someone advice on a procedure that is normally done by competant 'smiths, but the dude or dudess gets the procedure wrong and ends up hurting someone or themself.............where does that put things?
Where does that put the rest of us who won't do such a thing?
Kinda like, if you meet a bad Cop, they're all bad..........attitude.
Okay folks fire away............