Local Government Encourages Citizen To Arm Themselves

I would think in a state as large and as thinly populated as Alaska dealing with the criminal element in a more "informal" manner would be much simpler.
There is a scene in The Sopranos where Janice Soprano is punched-and punched hard-by her boyfriend Richie Aprile. She deals with him-then calls her brother who tells her "You don't gotta talk to nobody!"
 
Sooooooo yeah...you've been suggesting that because it's a rural area, and because people don't agree with the law, it might be possible to violate said law, as in some sort of Hatfield-McCoy Feud or some sort of Blair Mountain/Matewan, WV coal war. smh whatever.
Minus the Hatfield_McCoy and coal war comparison, that is how it works in some areas of the country. A large percentage of the population, including you, apparently, does not agree with the law, as it stands. Eventually, people get tired of this sort of nonsense. Look up the famous "rooftop Koreans", for a well known example. Here in Idaho, we saw a large number of armed folks go to Couer D' Alene to "defend" the town when Antifa/BLM was planning to protest there. It worked too. There are sheriffs, prosecutors and judges who don't want to see an upstanding citizen in their community go to prison for protecting their property from a known druggie and troublemaker. Because of that, unjust state laws like that do not get consistently and evenly enforced across the state, in every case. That's not my opinion, that's a fact. I don't know, I've never been there, but perhaps the citizens of Matanuska-Susitna Borough don't agree with the state's laws protecting would-be criminals.
I mean..good luck with that. That's not a conversation I'm willing to have.
And yet, here we are. ;)
 
Back
Top