Preacherman
Member
From the London TIMES (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,482-645577,00.html):
April 14, 2003
The liberation of Iraq started on July 4, 1776
William Rees-Mogg
Democracy is a continuous revolution. April 9, 2003, was Liberty Day for Iraq, the day on which one of the foulest of the 20th-century tyrannies was finally destroyed. The liberation of Baghdad was greeted with celebration as well as looting, and by ill-concealed dismay in Paris, Berlin, Moscow and the left-wing British press. It was unquestionably a victory for the United States, not only for the American forces, but also for the American model of society.
The United States has for more than a century been the engine of global liberation. Historical processes have no clear-cut point of origin, but one can identify some of the critical dates.
There was September 11, 2001, when that evil man, Osama bin Laden, destroyed the American sense of immunity from foreign attack. There was August 2, 1990, when the equally evil Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. There was April 4, 1949, when the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation committed the United States to the collective defence of the free world. There was December 7, 1941, when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, forcing the United States to join the war. There was April 6, 1917, when the US President, Woodrow Wilson, declared war on Germany in response to unrestricted submarine warfare.
Behind that, there is February 15, 1898, when the US battleship Maine exploded in Havana harbour, which led to the liberation of Cuba. My mother, as a child of six, read the newspaper placards, “Remember the Maineâ€. There is April 12, 1861, when the Confederate Army bombarded Fort Sumter in defence of the institution of slavery. Even more famous is July 4, 1776, when the Declaration of Independence was signed at Philadelphia. There is a consistency about these events.
The United States usually intervenes with reluctance — it took 13 years to get from the original invasion of Kuwait to the removal of the Saddam Hussein regime. The US has even tried to avoid intervention by propping up authoritarian regimes, as in modern Saudi Arabia. Yet the underlying American idea is the most revolutionary idea in the world. It is the idea of liberty, of human freedom, of self-government and of democracy. Without American, and often British, intervention, most of the present-day democracies would never come in to existence, or would not have survived, particularly the European democracies.
Last week France, Germany and Russia met in St Petersburg to concert their reaction to the American victory. All three had refused to agree to intervention in Iraq on behalf of the United Nations. They share responsibility for the impotence of the UN. Yet France has been saved three times in the past 100 years by the United States, from Prussian militarism in 1917, from Nazi occupation in 1944, and from Soviet communism in the postwar years. French liberty is the product of American interventions; the French Government finds it shocking that the people of Iraq should have the same assistance. Jacques Chirac was a good friend of the dictator Saddam for 25 years in which Saddam killed some 2 million people. It was a corrupt partnership.
The Germans are in much the same position. Three times saved, and now wholly ungrateful under their two-faced Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder. In 1918 the Allied victory, which depended on the fresh American troops, overturned the old, aggressive, anti-Semitic Prussian Empire.
In 1945 the United States led the coalition which freed Germany from Hitler. After 1945 the US, particularly during the Berlin crisis, saved Germany from Stalin. In the 1980s US pressure led to the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, which made possible the reunification of Germany. The German Government was opposed to Iraq enjoying similar assistance.
The same is even true of Russia. In 1942 the Russians made a magnificent recovery from the defeats of 1941, which had almost proved terminal. But without US intervention, the war could not have been won; probably the Soviet Union would have fallen to Hitler. The Russian people would not have been liberated from Stalinism if the Americans had not won the Cold War. That was a war again tyranny. The Russian Government has been more than prepared to leave the people of Iraq to rot under Saddam Hussein.
Like France, Russia had strong commercial, financial and oil interests in the survival of the Saddam regime. With incredible dishonesty, the Russians even spied on the Anglo-American alliance and passed the information to their ally, Saddam.
The battle for liberty had been the core of US history from the beginning. In the 1770s, the United States fought a victorious war to free themselves from British rule, with some help from France. They fought England for self-government, inspired by English ideas.
It is no shame to be helped to gain national liberty either by foreign ideas or foreign force.
Another vital date in the history of liberty is November 5, 1688, when William of Orange landed in England. We were liberated with the help of the Dutch in the 17th century; the Americans liberated themselves with the help of the French in the 18th; some 30 modern European nations owe their liberty and democracy to interventions by the United States in the 20th.
The American idea of liberty developed from the English revolutionary ideas of the 17th century, from the history of two civil wars, above all from the philosophy of John Locke. But liberty has gained its dominance in the 20th and 21st centuries because it succeeds in economic as well as political terms. Liberty has created the most advanced modern nations, on the model of the United States.
American forces have twice been able to win in the Gulf, with light casualties, in Kosovo, and in Afghanistan, because the United States, with about a 20th of the world’s population, has the most advanced science, the best technology, the highest productivity, the best electronic communications, the most advanced weapons, the greatest logistical capacity. US power is the result of a free economy in a free society.
In Iraq, the overwhelming victory was won in three weeks by no more than one sixth of the potential defence forces of America. No such result could have been achieved, or even contemplated, by the armed forces of any other nation. The US model has repeatedly proved to be uniquely powerful, not just in defence, but in broader economic political and international terms.
Now democracy is spreading in a remarkable way. There are 54 African nations; Africa is the poorest continent on earth. In 1989 only four of these nations were democracies; in 2003, 17 of them are democratic despite poverty, the spread of Aids, and the social problems of tribalism. In 1989 the Warsaw Pact still existed. None of the regions of the Soviet Union, nor any of the Warsaw Pact nations, were democracies. Now most former Soviet countries and all the Warsaw Pact nations are democracies, despite corruption and the ghosts of the past. Self-government in a free society has become the global standard.
China herself is much freer than in 1989 and is applying the principles of “sustainable development†to constitutional and economic growth. All of this, the spread of freedom in Africa, Europe, China and the former Soviet Union, is the result of the example of the American model.
In Europe, which has been so impotent, there is widespread fear that the neo-conservatives in Washington will be “recklessâ€. I do not see anything reckless in President Bush. His reaction to the shock of September 11 was gradual and considered. It will be a good thing if dictators recognise that they have no sovereign immunity which entitles them to abuse their power, to murder or torture their people, or to sponsor terrorists.
The American victory in Iraq is a warning to the tyrants and terrorists of the world. The momentum of liberty continues to accelerate. The dictators have had a very bad couple of decades; in 1980 the world was still “half slave and half freeâ€. Now the remaining dictators, old Castro, young Assad, Kim Jong Il, mad Mugabe and the others, look foolish and obsolete, though still horrible. They must mend their ways or liberty and democracy will amend them. In the Lockean phrase quoted in the Boston Freemen’s Declaration of 1774: “‘Just and true Liberty, equal and impartial Liberty’ is a thing that all men are clearly entitled to.†Despite the failures of the Security Council, the people of Iraq now have the expectation of liberty.
April 14, 2003
The liberation of Iraq started on July 4, 1776
William Rees-Mogg
Democracy is a continuous revolution. April 9, 2003, was Liberty Day for Iraq, the day on which one of the foulest of the 20th-century tyrannies was finally destroyed. The liberation of Baghdad was greeted with celebration as well as looting, and by ill-concealed dismay in Paris, Berlin, Moscow and the left-wing British press. It was unquestionably a victory for the United States, not only for the American forces, but also for the American model of society.
The United States has for more than a century been the engine of global liberation. Historical processes have no clear-cut point of origin, but one can identify some of the critical dates.
There was September 11, 2001, when that evil man, Osama bin Laden, destroyed the American sense of immunity from foreign attack. There was August 2, 1990, when the equally evil Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. There was April 4, 1949, when the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation committed the United States to the collective defence of the free world. There was December 7, 1941, when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, forcing the United States to join the war. There was April 6, 1917, when the US President, Woodrow Wilson, declared war on Germany in response to unrestricted submarine warfare.
Behind that, there is February 15, 1898, when the US battleship Maine exploded in Havana harbour, which led to the liberation of Cuba. My mother, as a child of six, read the newspaper placards, “Remember the Maineâ€. There is April 12, 1861, when the Confederate Army bombarded Fort Sumter in defence of the institution of slavery. Even more famous is July 4, 1776, when the Declaration of Independence was signed at Philadelphia. There is a consistency about these events.
The United States usually intervenes with reluctance — it took 13 years to get from the original invasion of Kuwait to the removal of the Saddam Hussein regime. The US has even tried to avoid intervention by propping up authoritarian regimes, as in modern Saudi Arabia. Yet the underlying American idea is the most revolutionary idea in the world. It is the idea of liberty, of human freedom, of self-government and of democracy. Without American, and often British, intervention, most of the present-day democracies would never come in to existence, or would not have survived, particularly the European democracies.
Last week France, Germany and Russia met in St Petersburg to concert their reaction to the American victory. All three had refused to agree to intervention in Iraq on behalf of the United Nations. They share responsibility for the impotence of the UN. Yet France has been saved three times in the past 100 years by the United States, from Prussian militarism in 1917, from Nazi occupation in 1944, and from Soviet communism in the postwar years. French liberty is the product of American interventions; the French Government finds it shocking that the people of Iraq should have the same assistance. Jacques Chirac was a good friend of the dictator Saddam for 25 years in which Saddam killed some 2 million people. It was a corrupt partnership.
The Germans are in much the same position. Three times saved, and now wholly ungrateful under their two-faced Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder. In 1918 the Allied victory, which depended on the fresh American troops, overturned the old, aggressive, anti-Semitic Prussian Empire.
In 1945 the United States led the coalition which freed Germany from Hitler. After 1945 the US, particularly during the Berlin crisis, saved Germany from Stalin. In the 1980s US pressure led to the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, which made possible the reunification of Germany. The German Government was opposed to Iraq enjoying similar assistance.
The same is even true of Russia. In 1942 the Russians made a magnificent recovery from the defeats of 1941, which had almost proved terminal. But without US intervention, the war could not have been won; probably the Soviet Union would have fallen to Hitler. The Russian people would not have been liberated from Stalinism if the Americans had not won the Cold War. That was a war again tyranny. The Russian Government has been more than prepared to leave the people of Iraq to rot under Saddam Hussein.
Like France, Russia had strong commercial, financial and oil interests in the survival of the Saddam regime. With incredible dishonesty, the Russians even spied on the Anglo-American alliance and passed the information to their ally, Saddam.
The battle for liberty had been the core of US history from the beginning. In the 1770s, the United States fought a victorious war to free themselves from British rule, with some help from France. They fought England for self-government, inspired by English ideas.
It is no shame to be helped to gain national liberty either by foreign ideas or foreign force.
Another vital date in the history of liberty is November 5, 1688, when William of Orange landed in England. We were liberated with the help of the Dutch in the 17th century; the Americans liberated themselves with the help of the French in the 18th; some 30 modern European nations owe their liberty and democracy to interventions by the United States in the 20th.
The American idea of liberty developed from the English revolutionary ideas of the 17th century, from the history of two civil wars, above all from the philosophy of John Locke. But liberty has gained its dominance in the 20th and 21st centuries because it succeeds in economic as well as political terms. Liberty has created the most advanced modern nations, on the model of the United States.
American forces have twice been able to win in the Gulf, with light casualties, in Kosovo, and in Afghanistan, because the United States, with about a 20th of the world’s population, has the most advanced science, the best technology, the highest productivity, the best electronic communications, the most advanced weapons, the greatest logistical capacity. US power is the result of a free economy in a free society.
In Iraq, the overwhelming victory was won in three weeks by no more than one sixth of the potential defence forces of America. No such result could have been achieved, or even contemplated, by the armed forces of any other nation. The US model has repeatedly proved to be uniquely powerful, not just in defence, but in broader economic political and international terms.
Now democracy is spreading in a remarkable way. There are 54 African nations; Africa is the poorest continent on earth. In 1989 only four of these nations were democracies; in 2003, 17 of them are democratic despite poverty, the spread of Aids, and the social problems of tribalism. In 1989 the Warsaw Pact still existed. None of the regions of the Soviet Union, nor any of the Warsaw Pact nations, were democracies. Now most former Soviet countries and all the Warsaw Pact nations are democracies, despite corruption and the ghosts of the past. Self-government in a free society has become the global standard.
China herself is much freer than in 1989 and is applying the principles of “sustainable development†to constitutional and economic growth. All of this, the spread of freedom in Africa, Europe, China and the former Soviet Union, is the result of the example of the American model.
In Europe, which has been so impotent, there is widespread fear that the neo-conservatives in Washington will be “recklessâ€. I do not see anything reckless in President Bush. His reaction to the shock of September 11 was gradual and considered. It will be a good thing if dictators recognise that they have no sovereign immunity which entitles them to abuse their power, to murder or torture their people, or to sponsor terrorists.
The American victory in Iraq is a warning to the tyrants and terrorists of the world. The momentum of liberty continues to accelerate. The dictators have had a very bad couple of decades; in 1980 the world was still “half slave and half freeâ€. Now the remaining dictators, old Castro, young Assad, Kim Jong Il, mad Mugabe and the others, look foolish and obsolete, though still horrible. They must mend their ways or liberty and democracy will amend them. In the Lockean phrase quoted in the Boston Freemen’s Declaration of 1774: “‘Just and true Liberty, equal and impartial Liberty’ is a thing that all men are clearly entitled to.†Despite the failures of the Security Council, the people of Iraq now have the expectation of liberty.
