yhtomit
Member
This is not a deep or profound question, sorry
But I'm curious: what's the longest barrel that you're aware of for commercially available rifles, in any man-portable caliber short of .50 cal? Modern military rifles seem mostly to not have barrels much past 20"; I assume that's largely in the interest of weight savings as well as anticipation of short-quarters warfare.
Hunting rifles go somewhat longer, but still ... does anyone make (modern, not just reproductions for retro-fun) rifles with barrels that approach the length of, say, the Kentucky Rifle? Since most rifles are certainly considerably shorter, I'm curious what the limiting factors are; is it mostly because powder science has advanced so far, that there's no need for such a long barrel? (i.e. All the energy that's going to be exerted on the bullet is already going, so why waste effort pushing it along more twists?).
timothy
But I'm curious: what's the longest barrel that you're aware of for commercially available rifles, in any man-portable caliber short of .50 cal? Modern military rifles seem mostly to not have barrels much past 20"; I assume that's largely in the interest of weight savings as well as anticipation of short-quarters warfare.
Hunting rifles go somewhat longer, but still ... does anyone make (modern, not just reproductions for retro-fun) rifles with barrels that approach the length of, say, the Kentucky Rifle? Since most rifles are certainly considerably shorter, I'm curious what the limiting factors are; is it mostly because powder science has advanced so far, that there's no need for such a long barrel? (i.e. All the energy that's going to be exerted on the bullet is already going, so why waste effort pushing it along more twists?).
timothy