HisDivineShadow
Member
I'm looking at some 1892 levers, Rossi Pumas to be precise. I've kinda fallen for the 20" carbine model in .44mag, but I am wondering if the accuracy of the carbine is much worse than the rifle model in 24"?
I know the carbine sights probably aren't as good but for this situation we can count them as equal because nomatter which I get the factory sights will be replaced with a peep sight with suitable front sight post. I am thinking the barrel bands might interfere accuracy wise but I see Paco Kelly has some tips on how to make those merely a cosmetic thing.
I read about someone with his 24" Rossi rifle and he shot metal plates at 175 yards without any problems, he had a tang sight too, like the one I plan to get, that's the kind of shooting and accuracy I am after. I've fallen for the carbine look and I generally like shorter rifles, but not if it will be a lot worse accuracy wise than a rifle.
I know the carbine sights probably aren't as good but for this situation we can count them as equal because nomatter which I get the factory sights will be replaced with a peep sight with suitable front sight post. I am thinking the barrel bands might interfere accuracy wise but I see Paco Kelly has some tips on how to make those merely a cosmetic thing.
I read about someone with his 24" Rossi rifle and he shot metal plates at 175 yards without any problems, he had a tang sight too, like the one I plan to get, that's the kind of shooting and accuracy I am after. I've fallen for the carbine look and I generally like shorter rifles, but not if it will be a lot worse accuracy wise than a rifle.
Last edited: