Lower recommended powder charges?

Status
Not open for further replies.

exbrit49

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
409
Location
Indiana
Well here I am scratching my head over modern reloading manuals again! For over 30 years I have been pushing 38 SPL - 158G LSWC in front of 4.5 GR of Red Dot. It was a load from the Hornady reloading manual (Vol 2)from 1979. The top charge listed is 4.9Gr. I distinctly remember working up from a start of 4.0gr and wound up at the noted 4.5gr I found this to be a very accurate and consistent performing load. I have loaded and fired literally thousands of rounds through my eclectic mix of revolvers and have not seen one sign of high pressure. They chrono right at 925 fps out of my 6 inch Model 19 and are extremely consistent. Yes they are a stout load but one that feels good to me.
Now 30 years later, all the modern manuals state that this is in the +P loading pressure range and way over pressure for a standard 38 spl. . The few loadings I did find for Red Dot behind the 158 LSWC were down in the 3 to 3.4gr.
Just for the heck of it, I loaded 5 each of various charges up again today and the low end of 3.2 was so tame it was pathetic. I worked all the way back up to the 4.5gr that I have used all these years and still find it the best combo!
So to heck with the manuals! I will continue to do what I have always done! Find a middle of the line start charge and work up a load that provides the accuracy and constant results I expect without showing any signs of pressure and checking velocity with an accurate chrono. I realize that the Chrono won’t tell me internal pressures, but it does give me a darn good idea of what’s happening. After some 35 years of shooting I think I could spot signs of high pressure.
Please no replies stating that Red Dot is not recommended for handgun loads, after 30 years’ experience with this powder in 38s and 45acp I don’t intend to change. I use Bullseye, Unique, Accurate #5 for other pistol calibers and each one has been selected for a specific job over a long period in time.
Back to the original point! Has any one else noticed this tendency to keep lowering the recommended powder charges? Could it be that the threat of a liability suit has led to this?
Happy trails :D
Roger
 
Last edited:
4.2 grs is the highest powder charge i have found. Have you checked your scale with test weights? Different Components = Different Pressure Your good to go, as you worked up the load. :)
 
Thanks for the input, Yes powder weights verified on 2 scales. As I noted, same results as 30 years ago. Because of the long time period I thought that perhaps the powder had been reformulated but judging from all the results that doesnt appear to be the case.
Thanks
Roger
 
Measurement instruments have gotton much better and with piezo measurement systems and the speed of computers, ballisticians have had to literally "rewrite the book".

You have a Model 19 and +P loads are perfectly safe in your gun. On the other hand SAAMI has limits and the books stop when the limits are reached.

With a low pressure round like a .38 Special there are no "pressure signs" that you can read that will tell you when the gun is going to blow up, it'll just blow up.
 
It seems that over time they've downloaded/graded about everything. Red Dot is about my favorite powder.. have used it for a long time for about everything that goes "pow".
 
Measurement instruments have gotton much better and with piezo measurement systems and the speed of computers, ballisticians have had to literally "rewrite the book".

You have a Model 19 and +P loads are perfectly safe in your gun. On the other hand SAAMI has limits and the books stop when the limits are reached.

With a low pressure round like a .38 Special there are no "pressure signs" that you can read that will tell you when the gun is going to blow up, it'll just blow up.
Let me expand a bit.

Kludge is right. Better, more sensitive and quicker-responding instruments (I am told) have transformed the interior ballistics science. We can now see transient pressure peaks and spikes better than before, and to keep these within SAAMI specs, the loads have been reduced.

At least, that's how the explanation goes.

How you want to run your OWN ballistics lab is up to you.

Your history with your loads in your gun tend to make me support your feelings. Are you observing ALL the available signs of pressure?
.
http://www.shootersforum.com/handloading-procedures-practices/58763-pressure-signs.html

Lost Sheep
 
You will see signs of pressure. If the case sticks in the cylinder then the pressure is to high. Now I don't know how close you are to blowing up your gun at this point. High pressure loads are also going to scratch the back strap faster. Unless you are measuring this then you won't see the gun is about to blow up.

At 3.2gn of Bullseye I find a load with 158gn actions from MBC that I like. I don't know the COL off the top of my head tho. From my use Red Dot & Bullseye are close with Red Dot using just a little less.
 
"Now 30 years later, all the modern manuals state that this is in the +P loading pressure range and way over pressure for a standard 38 spl. . The few loadings I did find for Red Dot behind the 158 LSWC were down in the 3 to 3.4gr. "

It seems you've proven the load is safe for you. So, if you keep using it maybe your newer manuals will blow up? :D
 
Red Dot is an excellent powder for pistol loads. I use PROMO, Alliant's less expensive equivalent , for shotshell as well as pistol loads.
I have laso noticed a tendency by Alliant to reduce and sometimes vary the recommended maximum charge. I have not seen this same phenomenon with recommended maximum loads by either Winchester or Hodgdon for their powders.
 
You will see signs of pressure. If the case sticks in the cylinder then the pressure

Hi King MT. Just a reply to your comments. The backstrap has been inspected on all of my revolvers and show no signs of pressure cutting nor stretch or distortion. The cases eject easily from all of my revolvers and primers show no indication of high case pressures.
It should also be of interest that my standard .38 cases usually last in excess of 20 reloadings. When they fail it is always a crack at the case mouth from flaring and crimping.
Other than destructive cutting up the backstrap and microsectioning and inspecting with a high power microscope, there is no way of verifying your statements that it is already metal fatigued. I dont feel they are ready to blow up! In fact if I had any doubts, I would not have just worked up the load all over again. I admit that these loads are being used in .357 mag arms but the pressure signs would be the same in a 38 cylinder.
I appreciate the input, but I am pretty sure that if the backstrap is going to fail, the pressure signs would have been there for me to see. Since there are none and I have been using the model 19 and the Charter Arms Bulldog ( aluminum framed) with this load for 30 years, I think the fact that both these guns are still in great shape tells the story.
 
Last edited:
925 fps with Red Dot, 158 gr LSWC, and a 6" revolver is ~~ 17 kpsi

38 special is 17 kpsi
38 special is 18.5 kpsi
357 mag is 35 kpsi
Cases stick in chamber ~ 40 kpsi [depends on brass hardness and chamber material Young's modulus and chamber wall thickness]

I have split the cylinder and sometimes broken the top strap on a number of 38 specials. None of them have ever failed for me at 357 mag pressures ore less. Fast pistol powder can split some 38 specials in a work up before stuck cases happen. Do not work up to pressure sign in 38 sp.

Shooting loose so the bolt slot in the frame is sloppy can happen at any pressure, but it happens a lot faster with high pressure. Smith a Wessons are bad for shooting loose. Rugers come loose from the factory. Colt designs after ~ 1907 stay tight, but they don't make them any more.


If you have been doing something for 30 years, chances are you could do it for another 30 years, if you live that long.
 
My post isn't telling you that you're loads are over pressure. It was a response to there is not signs of pressure in a revolver. I have never split a cylinder before sticking a case & I have used very fast powder. I pay close attention to Clark's post tho & give his comments a lot of credit. [email protected]
 
Last edited:
So far, I use Red Dot for:

.38 S&W
.38 Special
.357 Magnum
.44Magunm
.35 Remington

My plinking loads in .38 Special are 3.5gr Red Dot under 158gr hard cast Penn TCBB...
My plinking loads in .357 Mag is 5gr Red Dot under the same bullet...

Using the same bullet in the .35 Remington, and load to .357 Magnum velocities...
 
I have never used Red Dot. My first Lyman manual (1957 vintage) doesn't even list it.

My first Lyman manual had Unique max at 7.8 grains in the 44 Spl for bullet #429421 about 250 gr depending on the mix. The manual lists the velocity as 970 FPS. I worked up a load to 7.7 and used that for years. I literally shot thousands of those at that load (7.7 gr Unique, 250 gr bullet) in my Colt SAA. I know at that time it was popular to push them for all you dared. This trend is what brought about the 44 Mag, and the 357 Mag.

The Lyman 49th max is at 6.9, same bullet. I too wondered if the powder had been changed, but I suspect it is other things at work. Perhaps better testing? I have reduced my loads to today's recommendations. If I want more oomph, I drag out the 44 mag.
 
The early Hornady manual I have (published 1973) was quite a bit warmer than the #9 Speer manual I'd bought the same same year. The Speer manual listed 3.9 grs of Red Dot as max with their 158gr LSCW for 909 fps from a 6" Model 19. The Hornady, well you can see for yourself below.

I used to load .38 spl 158gr LSWC's behind 5.5 gr of Unique until I got my first chrono and found they where leaving the barrel of a 4" revolver at 1,050 fps. Wasn't an issue in my younger days as all I owned was .357 magnums but now that's pretty hot for the .38's I now own.

73Hornady158gr38spl.jpg
 
Great inputs from all and I respect and value all the comments and input. I have decided to reduce my loading to 4.3gr and try that for a while. Thanks Steve C! thats the exact page where my original load was worked up from!
I know that my earlier testing has shown that the 4.5 has been the optimal load but in view of all the new info I will cut back to 4.3 and as long as the accuracy holds, I will make this my new standard load for use in my existing revolvers.
If I decide to aquire another 38, I will drop the charge back further as I also wonder about the quality of some of the newer arms, especially imports.
Again thanks to all,
Roger
Happy Trails and keep them shooting straight :D
 
Went out today and shot off another 200 of the 4.5g loads (only another 1500 plus to fire off) and after I got back I very carefully measured all the fired cases and compared them with a few dozen I shot off using 4.3g Red Dot. Measured all the Saami points and cases are all within normal range. As noted in my last post I loved the 4.6 loadings but have now started loading down to 4.3 just to stay on the safe side. Still over recomendations but well proven in my .357s. POI changed down about 3/8 to 1/2 inch and groups stayed pretty tight. so the 4.3 is acceptable to me. As noted earlier in my other posts, the loads down in the 3.2 to 3.4 g range are reallly wimpy!

After that I let loose of 100 45 Colts in the New Blackhawk, all loaded on the high side and had a great afternoon.
A young couple that followed us on the range wanted to know what I had been shooting as they "boomed" I showed them the 45 colt cartridges and they were a little stunned as they looked at the ammo. said "they looked like rifle ammo", I offered to let him shoot a chamber full, he did and he seemed "Hooked". He asked the cost of the super Blackhawk in the dual 45ACP and 45 Colt and said he would try and trade up for one. He was shooting a Ruger P95 and said that he had purchased it for fire power and the larger capacity of the auto, but after shooting the single action I think he fell head over heels, his girl friend wanted to shoot it too and she was surprised to find that her shots were grouped way tighter than with the Auto. I suspect they will stop by the LGS on the way home. They offered me chance to shoot their P95 as I have the P90 and the P89. The P95 produced very acceptable results and I thought it was a nice piece but they were still fascinated by the big Blackawk SA.
Its nice to share experiences and it was a great summer afternoon at the range.
I know why I love my hobby!!
 
Last edited:
exbrit49,
Way to go showing the young'ins how great a SA revolver shoots. I usually shoot only revolvers and my SA revolvers are my favorite, especially in .45 Colt...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top