M&P vs Sig

[Carter]

I'd say m&p for sheer simplicity and consistent trigger pull. I also prefer polymer frames over steel. Its a great gun that I've seen far less malfunctions out of than glocks. I think that is mostly due to limp wristing the .40, and the m&p handles the recoil better so limp wristing is mitigated.

 

[9mmepiphany]

I think the Smith has a magazine disconnect so there is no way i would carry it for protection.

Very few M&Ps have the magazine disconnect, it was mostly offered for markets that required them. If you get one that comes with one installed and you don't like it, it is disabled with the removal of a single part and installation of a spring from a ball point pen

 

[contactcole]

The 9mm one.

 

[golfer_ray]

I am not a gun guru, & not an expert shooter, but I've owned two Sig 9mm & couldn't hit even close to the target, but my M&P 40 is a keeper!

 

[allaroundhunter]

I am not a gun guru, & not an expert shooter, but I've owned two Sig 9mm & couldn't hit even close to the target, but my M&P 40 is a keeper!

That just says that either a: you weren't aware that Sig uses a different sight picture than the M&P or b: you were not able to adjust to the Sig's trigger system.

The first one is fixable, the second is all about practice and personal preferences.

 

[Matno]

My Sig p226 still hits at point of aim and will put 10 shots inside an inch and a half at 25 yards (if I do my part) after 21 years...