M203 heading out the door?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nightfall

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2003
Messages
1,817
Location
WA
http://www.hkdefense.us/corporate/media/pdf/GLMPR051205.pdf

Heckler & Koch Defense Wins Multi-year
Contract for New U.S. Army Grenade Launcher


Sterling, Virginia (May 12, 2005) Heckler & Koch Defense Inc. was awarded a competitive contract to produce the new add-on grenade launcher for the U.S. Army. The U.S. XM320 40x46mm Grenade Launcher Module may replace the inventory of M203 grenade launchers currently in use by the Army, including those launchers used by Army units in Iraq and Afghanistan. This award marks the completion of a full and open competition among several companies to provide a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) shoulder-fired grenade launcher that met or surpassed all user-developed requirements. The total potential value of this contract is $29 million with a potential purchase of more than 11,000 launchers, day/night sights, and assorted items (tools, parts, and accessories) over the life of the contract.

The XM320 Grenade Launcher Module was selected after months of rigorous bid sample testing, including a user evaluation at the Army’s Aberdeen Test Center in Aberdeen, Maryland. The XM320 is a multi-functional single-shot launcher that can be attached to a wide range of current issue U.S. weapons including the M16A2 and M16A4 rifles, and M4, M4A1 and M4 MWS carbines.

The open architecture of the XM320 will enable soldiers to easily attach the launcher, in seconds and without tools, to current and newly emerging weapon platforms ranging from compact carbines to light machine guns. The XM320 can also be used as a stand-alone weapon when the add-on, multi-position sliding buttstock is added. The XM320 GLM is unique in that it uses a side-opening barrel that permits the use of all current 40x46mm ammunition as well as many longer cartridges that, due to their overall length, could not be fired from the M203 grenade launcher. The use of a double-action trigger system allows the XM320 to be safely loaded and unloaded while the launcher remains in an uncocked condition. The double-action trigger system is controlled by the use of an ambidextrous manual rotary safety lever and also permits multiple primer strikes without the need to open the breech.

The sights for the XM320 are attached directly to the grenade launcher’s receiver ensuring the zero (aiming/impact point) of the weapon is retained when it is removed and later reinstalled on another weapon or when its used in the stand-alone mode. The building block design approach of the XM320 allows for a choice of three distinct sighting systems. A ranging day/night sight produced by Insight Technology Inc. of Londonderry New Hampshire provides a high probability of 24-hour first round target engagements within 5 meters out to 350 meters. A mechanical ladder sight can also be used in combination on the XM320 launcher.

Lighter in weight than the U.S. M203 grenade launcher, the XM320 is a combat-proven design produced by Heckler & Koch based on lessons learned from producing more than 30,000 similar launchers that have been in service since 2000 with the military forces of Britain, the Netherlands, Spain, Germany, and Portugal.

During U.S. Army testing the robust HK Grenade Launcher Module received superior marks for accuracy, reliability, and modularity. The XM320 Grenade Launcher Module provides unmatched performance and combat capability for the U.S warfighter, permitting the destruction of point targets and the suppression of area targets under both day and night conditions. Current plans call for the first Army deliveries to begin in early 2006.
 
A ranging day/night sight produced by Insight Technology Inc. of Londonderry New Hampshire provides a high probability of 24-hour first round target engagements within 5 meters out to 350 meters.

Call me a big sissy-girl, but I think that would be...ill-advised. :D

S/F

Farnham
 
Farnham,
As I recall, there are a variety of close-quaters rounds available in 40mm including less-lethal rubber projectiles and buckshot.

edit: Bah, got beat to it!
 
When I first read that statement, I figured it meant that you could hit within 5 meters at a distance of 350 meters. Anybody else see it this way?
 
the flachette round was much better then the buck, I just wish they would have consulted more with someone who had used the single shot....in a fire fight. single shots, just don't cut it !!!!
 
IIRC, the original buckshot round for the 40mm. grenade launcher had only 27 shot in a heavily modified cup - nowhere near full capacity, so it wasn't very effective. I understand the reason for this was that if the "warhead" was loaded to capacity with buckshot, it was far too heavy for the propellant charge to move it very fast, or very far. On the other hand, the flechette warhead had over 100 flechettes, so that even though one flechette did very little damage, the cumulative effect was spectacular... :eek:
 
Despite all the fun stuff about 40mm buckshot and flechette rounds (Mack Bolan, anyone?) I'm with Sergeant Sabre on this one. I think that they mean the you can pop the round into a 5m circle at 350m which is pretty impressive. Wonder what kind of hold-over you need for that?
 
dunno, jd.

I actually did better while fam-firing the 203 at Benning when I stopped trying to use the sights, and just eyeballed the target and popped it. Hit the top of the 200-meter wall, which was my aim point. :)

John
 
The M203 has problems with breaking the barrel latch when shooting special purpose rounds like ILLUM. The action doesn't open far enough to allow the use of many special purpose and less lethal rounds that are available, and it's not modular (the M203A1 is somewhat modular) which means you have to take it in to the shop and let the armorer install it on the rifle.

As far as I know they still haven't solved the close quarters issue with any 40mm round. The HI/LO pressure round doesn't lend itself to that application. Any round that develops enough pressure to launch multiple projectiles from a 40mm diameter barrel with enough velocity to be lethal at a reasonable distance wouldn't be safe to fire from the shoulder.

Yes they mean within 5 meters at 350 meters...5 meters is the burst radius of 40mm HEDP. This is an area weapon, like a mortar.

Jeff
 
*raise hand*

I know it is "unamerican" but why not do what other "less advanced" armies are doing. Have RPG teams mixed in with the regular troops. You can have any number of warheads and they are far lighter than the AT-4 and a lot cheaper as well. You can't argue with their effectiveness in trained hands.
 
Does anyone find it disturbing that the US Arms Industry is so dead that we have to get all our new toys from the likes of FN and HK instead of being able to design and build something at home? Hell, does anyone remember the story about the US buying $37 million worth of small arms from CHINA to give to Iraq?!!
 
Welcome to the global economy. The fact is, if someone makes a better product, we should buy it and license it for domestic manufacture.
 
dont' worry, this iwill be made by HK in the US so American jobs will be secure, but the profits will flow out of the country unfortunately.

does anyone have a photo? i wonder if it's going to be attached using the rail system. it would simplify the attachment issue on M16/M4, which is time consuming.
 
Have RPG teams mixed in with the regular troops.

The 40mm cartridge will not toast the squaddies hiding behind you, and won't eject you out the window when fired in a confined space. I think that RPG backblast is one reason that we still have the 40mm. Notice that Germany has a very nice RPG-style weapon (heck, they invented it during WWII) and yet still use the 40mm grenade launcher.

Bart Noir
 
I think that modern bullet-trap rifle grenades are something that should be seriously considered.
 
Bart Noir

I'm sorry I didn't explain myself enough. Those are exelent reasons to keep the 40mm in service, bu there are times when you need a big boom in a hurry. The rainbow trajectory of the 40mm really makes it difficult to use at longer ranges in urban targets. If you need to get a HE round through a door at 200 yrds to get a group of enemy, the 40mm can't do that. If you see enemy at 600 yds on the side of a mountain and want to pin him down until you can set up you're moartar. Many armies use recoiless weapons without toasting troops behind them, you just need a little situational awareness when doing so.
 
it's really not that much of an innovation. I dont' see why they didn't convert the M203 to use rail attachment so it will go on picatinny handguards.
 
A small reminder. A contract does not mean an issue weapon. If you don't believe me look up the Sgt York air defense weapon and the Crusader artillery system. They had contracts and the York had an order placed when the project was cancelled. Look closer at the wording of the article: Heckler & Koch Defense Inc. was awarded a competitive contract to produce the new add-on grenade launcher for the U.S. Army. The U.S. XM320 40x46mm Grenade Launcher Module may replace the inventory of M203 grenade launchers


Evaluation and testing could go on for years to try and get the bugs out, or eventually dropped for something newer and more reliable. I don't see the M203 being dropped, or even phased out, in the near future.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top