Magazine ban proposed in Illinois House

Status
Not open for further replies.

C0untZer0

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
5,431
Location
Illinois
URGENT ALERT – YOUR ACTION NEEDED

MAGAZINE BAN WILL BE ATTEMPTED THIS WEEK​

Today's proceedings can be followed here:

http://illinoiscarry.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=35769#entry434434

98th General Assembly Contact Information

http://illinoiscarry.com/forum/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_id=10483

Legislator lookup:

http://gis.elections.il.gov/map_viewer_update/default.aspx

or here:

http://www.capwiz.com/nra/state/main/?state=IL&view=myofficials

It’s very important that you make these calls. We realize that you’ve been called upon to act many times so far this year. But your continued support is crucial.

1. Call your state representative and politely tell them you are a law-abiding gun owner who objects to magazine bans. Politely advise them to vote NO on Amendment 12 – the magazine ban. If you do not know who your state representative is, then the Illinois State Board of Elections has a new interactive search page here:

www.elections.state.il.us/DistrictLocator/DistrictOfficialSearchByAddress.aspx


2. Post this alert to any and all Internet Bulletin Boards or blogs to which you subscribe.

3. Pass this alert on to your friends and family and ask them to call their legislators as well.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Count!
I fired off an email to all of them this morning.
If I get a chance to call during my lunch break I will call a couple. My rep is on our side!

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
Everyone should call their reps, now if possible, but hopefully before 12:00 noon because the representatives will be on the Floor of the House at 12:00 CST. As bad as Illinois is - we don't have a magazine ban / firearm capacity limit, but that could all change today.
 
I emailed EVERY rep this morning. I've received about 12 replies. Mostly from the folks on our side, but I got a couple of the "thanks for your concern" replies.
 
Amend 47 to HB1155 - a registration scheme for sales failed

Amend 48 to HB1155 - a scheme that requires a person to train with the specific firearm they carry and only carry a firearm they have been qualified on - failed

Amend 49 to HB1155 - limited people to just one CCW failed
 
Amendment 50 - vague bill forbiding firearms in any places or areas where alocohol is served - passed
 
Last edited:
Amendment 51 to to HB1155 requiring gun owners to carry $1 million in insurance - failed

Amendment 52 to HB1155 that creates a system that triggers a "may issue" hearing by LEA based on arrests (not convictions) - passed

http://ilga.gov/legislation/fulltex...d=HB&LegID=71607&DocNum=1155&GAID=12&Session=


Amendment 53 to HB1155 asking Illinois to postpone enacting gun legislation until it is determined that the Illinois State Police dept is ready to process CCW applications. - failed
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the update. I had to leave the office before they voted on the stupid insurance amendment.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
I think they sensed that they couldn't get the mag ban done today and it didn't come up for a vote.

Madigan now knows that there is support for banning firearms at places that primariliy serve alcohol and there is support for setting up a "may issue" system for people that have had 5 arrests.

Interestingly enough - the 5 arrest thing would trigger a may issue hearing for the Reverend Jesse Jackson (if he wanted a gun). It would also trigger a may issue hearing on people who have been arrested but not convicted during protests or any other kind of thing you could imagine.
 
The sequencial amendments will probably still keep coming

98th General Assembly Contact Information:

http://illinoiscarry.com/forum/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_id=10483

Legislator lookup:

http://gis.elections.il.gov/map_viewer_update/default.aspx

or here:

http://www.capwiz.com/nra/state/main/?state=IL&view=myofficials

ISRA is still asking people to call their representatives.

Please call your state representative and politely tell them you are a law-abiding gun owner who objects to magazine bans. Politely advise them to vote NO on magazine bans.

You can follow the proceedings here:

http://illinoiscarry.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=35802
 
Excerpt of an update from NRA lobbyist Todd Vandermyde


Staff had indicated late Monday that the magazine ban would be part of the special order on firearms on Tuesday. Your calls and our lobbying efforts thwarted that as they did not call the ban for a second vote. We believe they failed to call it because your calls are making the difference and they are still short votes.

While leadership is attempting to twist arms to find votes, your calls and emails are making the difference. Keep it up. We know that hearing that there is an impending vote at any minute, gets to be frustrating only to have the vote not take place. But such is the nature of the beast that we are forced to deal with. Chicago politicians control the process and can move things at a moment’s notice. All we can do is try to keep you, the members, informed as to the latest happenings at the capitol.

The fact that they schedule the magazine ban for a vote then don't follow through is a testament to your effectiveness and fact that you are among the most dedicated Second Amendment supporters in the country. The fact that you have held back the Chicago machine should be a badge of honor.

Keep it up and keep making those calls. Together we will prevail.


.
 
Last edited:
Here are the e-mail addresses of Illinois House representatives who made anti-2A / anti-gun votes recently, or people who voted P or NV - MINUS the hard core anti gunners (Acevedo, Cassidy, Currie, Zalewski, etc...) There probably are some hard core gun control politicians here as well as some who simply voted for political cover, but somewere in this list are the e-mails of the politicians that may be convinced to change their vote if enough pressure is brought to bear.

We want to politely point out that magazine bans do nothing to curb violent crime and ask that they oppose any magazine ban or magazine capacity limit.


[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
 
Last edited:
House adjourned - meaning the antis figured out they didn't have the votes (yet) to push more gun control bills and didn't expose their amendments to defeat.

There are more than a dozen anti-gun amendments and bills waiting in the wings, including 2 magazine bans.

They'll try to regroup, see where money needs to be allocated and pressure applied, but this is very encouraging because they've been racking up losses on the gun issue since January.

The only thing they have to show for it is support for some kind of provision prohibiting guns in places that primarily make their income from alcohol and a provision that would cause an automatic "may issue" hearing for people applying for CWP that have had 5 arrests (but not convictions).



.
 
Last edited:
Rumor is that the desire for mag bans is actually coming from Chicago City Hall - it's something that Rahm Emanual wants to see happen.
 
I sent emails and got several vague replies - we all need to be working together on this - thanks for being on top of things countzero
 
It looks like one thing that anti's will try today is pass legislation that would fine law-abiding gun owners $10,000 for allowing their FOID to expire.

Considering that the ISP currently has an estimated 75,000 person backlog for fulfilling FOID applications, and it's taking anywhere from 90 to 150 days for people to get their FOID cards - this is just another attack on law-abiding gun owners.

The ISRA is asking people to call their reps right away and ask them to oppose HB2265
 
Don't think the FOID backlog isn't intentional. Imagine a future where they only get to a few hundred foid applications a year. Yes you have the legal right to own a gun...just have to apply and wait...years. eventually they'll increase the FOID fee to a prohibitive level. What a mess you all have there. At least you got concealed carry...sort of.
 
I heard a rumor the NRA was contemplating suing the ISP for not processing FOID applications within the legal time limit. Anyone know if this is true?


Posted from Thehighroad.org App for Android
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top