I wouldn't worry about them taking a set from staying loaded.
It's actually the compression cycles of loading / unloading or shooting that weakens a mag spring, not leaving it compressed.
(Exception being some of the the newer hi-cap double column like Glocks and others. They should have taken a lesson from John B. on his Hi-Power mag. They can't be over-compressed, and can be left fully loaded till dooms-day, but then they don't hold 17 rounds like a Glock, only 13!)
Glock didn't leave enough room for the fully compressed spring when they designed them, and they do weaken from being over-compressed beyond the springs yield point. I have some Glock 23 mags that have been fully loaded 10 - 11 years, and they are about ready for new springs.
On the other hand, I have two pre-war Colt woodsman that had fully loaded mags in them, full of old copper cased UMC .22's when I bought them from estates. I assume they had been fully loaded sometime in 1936-37 or so, and left that way for 70+ years without weakening the springs.
Also have bought GI .45 mags in WWII canvas mag pouches with WWII dated ammo in them that are still 100%. That's 60+ years.
Some of my commercial 1911 mags and my S&W Model 39 mags have been fully loaded for going on 40 years now without a spring problem.
Same with a bunch of Vietnam era M16/AR15 20 & 30 round mags I keep loaded.
Same with some Ruger Mini-14 20's & 30's that have been stored loaded 20+ years now.
These guns were all designed from the get-go to not over-compress the springs with a full mag. They just don't ever weaken even from being left loaded for a lifetime, it seems!
BTW: It IS important that you change out your carry ammo every so often, like maybe every 6 mo. to a year.
But thats to keep fresh SD ammo in your mags, not to "Save the Springs".
rc