AtticusThraxx
Member
Would the word holocaust be too strong?
However, "holocaust" is a word best used with respect to the extermination of people (European Jews) and not to inanimate tools.
Sure looks like the work of Saint Browning to me....There's no 1911s pictured here!
However, "holocaust" is a word best used with respect to the extermination of people (European Jews) and not to inanimate tools.
Agreed, but if nothing else, it proves guns are not harmful on their own. These EVIL HANDGUNS didn't even put up a fight in the face of their own destruction.Originally posted by novaDAK
I hate seeing the destruction of helpless guns like that, no matter what kinda gun they are.
Coronach, you want to insult me? What the H is that "THIS IS ...."? My home may not be much, compared to the US of A, but it's mine, so you better watch it.
BTW I do wonder as this affair jumps up from time to time. I posted when it happened, then later again, and now again?
Paulus,these were whole $***load of NIB, unused, in factory grease Makarovs and TT-s, plus 500 Colts. 4500 TT-s, 1000 Maks, mint, should make you cry.
The HK specifically required the destruction, so the USPs could be bought a little cheaper. I'm assuming they didn't want those guns to enrich the civil market and lessen their chances there.