TallPine
Member
I have no clue at this point, insanity perhaps...?Why do you read it/reply to it?
But let me ask you one more thing ...
Since the driver denied ownership of the container, such that he has implicitly given the officer the right to just snatch it out of his vehicle, then does that mean that the driver will not be criminally liable for any prohibited substance should such happen to be found in the container?
No ....? I didn't think so.
The driver would be prosecuted for "possession" of a prohibited substance, while his "non-ownership" of the container abrogated any 4th amendment rights that might have applied.
A logical contradiction. But heck, all is fair in love and the war on drugs, right?
I'm going to give up and go away now.