Marines, Iraq, Guns

Status
Not open for further replies.

Leatherneck

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
2,545
Location
No. Virginia and Northern Neck
Hmmm...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

from the Naval Institute Proceedings
August 2004

Ask The Warriors About Iraq


By Lieutenant Colonel (select) Stanton S. Coerr, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve

President George W. Bush gathered U.S. support for invading Iraq by using two arguments: Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and Saddam Hussein supported al Qaeda terrorism. Now, vicious words and gratuitous finger pointing keep coming from people who insist they were misled. Politicians and TV experts sharply critique the Bush administration. Yet, I have not heard a word from anyone who actually carried a rifle or flew an aircraft in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and its ugly aftermath. What about consulting the guys who had-and still have-the most to lose?

As a Marine Corps reserve major, I was the senior U.S. officer attached to the 1 Royal Irish Battlegroup (a reinforced British rifle battalion). I commanded five Marine air-naval gunfire liaison teams and was the liaison officer between the U.S. Marines and the battlegroup. Seventeen days after activation on 14 January 2003, my Marines and I were in Kuwait, ready to go to war.

Having studied political science at Duke University and government at Harvard University, I understand realpolitik, geopolitical jujitsu, economics, and the realities of the Arab world. I am not a blind follower. But the war made sense then-and our presence there makes sense now.

At dawn on 22 March, we crossed the border in trace of the 5th Marine Regiment's sweep through the Ramaylah oil fields. We were the guys you saw on TV every night: filthy, hot, exhausted. Although the National Rifle Association's right-to-bear-arms mantra is a joke to me, I carried a loaded rifle, a loaded pistol, and a knife at all times. I pointed a loaded weapon at another human for the first time in my life. We killed numerous Iraqi soldiers. I directed air and artillery strikes in concert with my British artillery officer counterpart. Close up, we saw dead bodies, helmets with bullet holes in them, handcuffed prisoners, and oil well fires with flames leaping 100 feet in the air. In short, I did what I had spent 14 years training to do.

Apart from the violence, a number of things lifted our hearts. Thousands of Iraqis ran into the streets at the sight of us, screaming, waving, and cheering. They ran from their homes when our vehicles roared in from the south, bringing us bread, tea, cigarettes, and photos of their children. Much was lost in language differences, although my clear impression was: "Thank God, someone has arrived with bigger men and bigger guns to be on our side at last." We saw in the eyes of the people how a generation of fear reflects in the human soul.

For those who oppose the war, let there be no mistake: the Ba'ath regime was the Nazi Party of the second half of the 20th century. Saddam Hussein's brutal dictatorship raped, tortured, murdered, extorted, and terrorized the Iraqis for 35 years. Mass graves bear testimony to countless crimes. One U.S. Marine battalion liberated a prison populated entirely by children, where the jailers had brutalized the weakest of them and killed the strongest.

The Ba'ath Party retained power by placing officials in every city and village to keep the people under its boot. We found munitions and weapons everywhere. In Ramaylah, the local Ba'ath leader's desk contained brass knuckles and a handgun. These are the people who are in prison-where they belong.

Consider this analogy. For years, you watched the same large man come home at night. You listened to his yelling and the screams of children and the noise of breaking glass. You and everyone on the block knew he was beating his family. On behalf of the neighborhood, you asked him to stop. Then you begged; finally, you threatened him. Nothing worked. So, after 13 years, you muster the meanest guys you can find. You kick his door down, punch him in the face, and drag him away. The house is a mess, the family poor and abused. But now there is hope. You did the right thing.

I can speak with authority on the opinions of British and American infantrymen: at no time did anyone say-or imply-to any of us that we were invading Iraq to rid the country of weapons of mass destruction and avenge the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. We were there to oust a tyrant and return Iraq to its people. Marines carry out policy decisions, not make them-and none of us had the slightest doubt about the righteousness of our actions.

Take it from someone who was there and stood to lose everything. We must stay the course in Iraq. We owe it to the Iraqis and to the world.

Lieutenant Colonel (select) Coerr, a Marine reservist activated for Operation Iraqi Freedom, is an attack helicopter pilot and forward air controller. He is in the Home Depot Store Leadership Program in San Diego, California.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Political science and government; Harvard and Duke
Home Depot Leadership Program
and this
Although the National Rifle Association's right-to-bear-arms mantra is a joke to me

Well I guess all Marines don't have to see eye-to-eye on everything. :scrutiny:

TC
TFL Survivor
 
Good write-up on why our presence in Iraq is the right thing to do.

Too bad he cannot make the connection between RKBA and how it pertains to a citizenry being oppressed by its government.
 
Wow powerful statement there. Brought tears to my eyes. Okay that moments over lets slapem for the NRA comment:D & call it a great read.
 
Major Coerr's response.


http://www.usni.org/proceedings/proceedings.html

Comment from Stan Coerr

Amendment II: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Notice the words "militia" and "necessary to the security of a free state."

Nothing is mentioned about concealed weapons or allowing gun ownership by anyone who wants one.

My senior Team Commander during the war has 30 years with the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, was CO of SWAT, and has been in 4 wars dating back to Vietnam; he is hardly a pacifist. He agrees with me that guns on the street are the biggest threat to this country. He should know: he and his cops have to deal with them every day.

Iraq was and is awash in weapons. It didn't seem to help them much. Other countries awash in weapons: Somalia, Liberia, Kosovo, Congo, Afghanistan. Countries where gun laws are strictly enforced: England, Switzerland, Germany, France, Canada. Where would you rather live?

The United States had over 10,000 gun-related deaths last year, and no, they were not law-abiding citizens defending their living rooms. Anyone have an explanation for that?

Stan Coerr
 
BOGUS FACT ALERT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The United States had over 10,000 gun-related deaths last year, and no, they were not law-abiding citizens defending their living rooms. Anyone have an explanation for that?

Can we get a reliable source on this nugget of information???????????

Sounds like a bundled misconstued statistic to me.
 
schromf wrote:

Can we get a reliable source on this nugget of information???????????

Sounds like a bundled misconstued statistic to me.

It's around 9,300 for firearm murders. When you add suicide by firearm to those, it's around 25,000.
 
I logged on at the "Free Forum" there.

I posted this quick note:
Hmmm. Notice the words "shall not be infringed?"

The First amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Funny, it doesn't say anything about fax machines, internet, or conceable jump drives. Must not be protected.

Stan, we're talking about you here:

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=98592

You said, "Iraq was and is awash in weapons. It didn't seem to help them much."

It helped the Kurds. It forced Saddam to use helicopter gunships and armored vehicles. They are still there, aren't they? Do you think that Saddam allowed his enemies to be armed if he could help it?

"Kosovo,"

The 30,000-man Kosova Liberation Army kept the Serbs busy (and in tight formations) as NATO planes could more easily bomb them.

"Afghanistan"

It allowed them to push out the Soviets, and protected the Northern Alliance from the Taliban.

"Countries where gun laws are strictly enforced: England, Switzerland, Germany, France, Canada. Where would you rather live?"

The violent crime rate in England is greater than that of the US. The only thing we surpass them in is homocide. In 1900 when both the US and England had no nationwide gun laws, both had homicide rates in the vicinity of 1 per 100,000.

Switzerland is awash in guns, fully automatic Sig 550s and requires every able-bodied male of militia age to keep that very same rifle at home. Riflery is the national sport there.

Do a google search on "Target Switzerland."

Canada is also awash in guns. Canadian criminals, like the Brit criminals just don't see homicide as a solution to problems. Half of the country is in passive revolt over the collapsing gun registry by refusing to register their guns. American areas with similar demographics enjoy a crime rate as low or lower than Canda. Put LA, NYC or Gary, Indiana in Canada and you'd see the same crime rate.

"The United States had over 10,000 gun-related deaths last year, and no, they were not law-abiding citizens defending their living rooms. Anyone have an explanation for that?"

75% of homicides are committed by adult felons with an average of 6 years of criminal history. They kill other felons 71% of the time. The remainder mostly stem from criminal activity of like-minded juvenile offencers (see Gary Kleck and Don Kates "The Great American Gun Debate.")

I refuse to be lumped in with criminals and have my rights infringed due to your ignorance of criminology and epidemiology.

We await you at www.thehighroad.org

Rick
 
When you add suicide by firearm to those, it's around 25,000.
There is no relationship to firearms and suicide rate. Japan is the gun control capitol of the "Free World" and has suicide rates ranging from 60% higher and beyond.

Rick
 
Thanks,

Thats what I wanted to see, I was looking for it on the CDC site.

I get real edgy on undocumented stats, too much like the Brady bunch.
 
Matter of fact I remember hearing something awhile back about the CDC and guns.
Didn't they complete a study that countered the anti-gun arguement and proved it incorrect?

Gotta search that one some also.
So much to do.
Don't forget to write the Govenator.

Vick
 
Didn't they complete a study that countered the anti-gun arguement and proved it incorrect?

No, they simply found the evidence to be inconclusive. There's quite a difference.
 
AZRickD wrote:

There is no relationship to firearms and suicide rate. Japan is the gun control capitol of the "Free World" and has suicide rates ranging from 60% higher and beyond.

I never implied that they do have a relationship beyond just being the popular choice. I was just stating that there are around 16,000 suicides committed using firearms in the US each year. Thus, those would be "gun-related deaths."

schromf wrote:

Source???????????

My ~9,300 firearm murder figure is from the 2002 FBI Uniform Crime Report. The suicide figure is from the CDC site somewhere. The FBI UCR is easy to find, just search for it on the FBI's site. The CDC site, however, isn't organized very well, so I don't remember which document I found the suicide figure in.
 
"I never implied that they do have a relationship "

I didn't say you did. I just wanted my debate point out there. ;)

BTW, it looks like my response on their web page has been taken down.

Rick
 
Here is the link to the CDCs injury and mortality reports. Create any kind of search you like. It's very customizable and gives good data:

http://webapp.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_fy.html

I did this search:

Manner of injury: Homicide
Mechanism of Injury: Firearm
All states, all ages, all races, year 2001
Result: 11,348 deaths

Same search for unintentional motor vehicle deaths: 42,443 deaths :what:

Unintentional firearm deaths: 802
Unintentional drowning deaths: 3281

It's all about context...
 
Major Coerr's response.


http://www.usni.org/proceedings/proceedings.html

Comment from Stan Coerr

Amendment II: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Notice the words "militia" and "necessary to the security of a free state."

Nothing is mentioned about concealed weapons or allowing gun ownership by anyone who wants one.

My senior Team Commander during the war has 30 years with the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, was CO of SWAT, and has been in 4 wars dating back to Vietnam; he is hardly a pacifist. He agrees with me that guns on the street are the biggest threat to this country. He should know: he and his cops have to deal with them every day.

Iraq was and is awash in weapons. It didn't seem to help them much. Other countries awash in weapons: Somalia, Liberia, Kosovo, Congo, Afghanistan. Countries where gun laws are strictly enforced: England, Switzerland, Germany, France, Canada. Where would you rather live?

The United States had over 10,000 gun-related deaths last year, and no, they were not law-abiding citizens defending their living rooms. Anyone have an explanation for that?

Stan Coer

The answer is that the ones who feel that America is awash in guns and its a problem are the ones who are hypocrates or should I say elitists like those who this person is citing that see the common armed American as a problem.

I don't care what that person is a commander of. If they think I don't have a right to be armed for my defense to hell with them. I'd rather jump off a cliff than condone or associate myself with someone as such. To compare a third world country like somalia to ours is reaching. That's a very disengenious arguement.

Police and government are not our betters. We as citizens have a right to the same defense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top