Trey Veston
Member
I bought a Remlin 1894 in 2017. It was awful compared to my JM 1894.
I sold it a couple of months ago for what I paid for it and bought a Henry that was twice the rifle for the same price.
Seems not many people have noticed that Ruger products have been decreasing steadily in quality and increasing in price. I was just at the LGS today and compared a Ruger Max 9 to a Taurus GX4. Identical build quality. The counter guy noted the same thing; Rugers are decreasing in quality while Taurus is getting better.
I would not expect the Ruglins to be much better than the Remlins. Of course, they can't get much worse.
I sold it a couple of months ago for what I paid for it and bought a Henry that was twice the rifle for the same price.
Seems not many people have noticed that Ruger products have been decreasing steadily in quality and increasing in price. I was just at the LGS today and compared a Ruger Max 9 to a Taurus GX4. Identical build quality. The counter guy noted the same thing; Rugers are decreasing in quality while Taurus is getting better.
I would not expect the Ruglins to be much better than the Remlins. Of course, they can't get much worse.