Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Maximum safe pressure for the M1 Garand

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by GarandOwner, Sep 24, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GarandOwner

    GarandOwner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    537
    Location:
    Florida
    Sorry if this seems like a dumb question, but I am still fairly new to reloading: Does anyone know what the maximum safe pressure is for the M1 Garand for reloads? Or is it more about the speed? I know that IMR 4895 is a good powder for it, but I am thinking of branching out and trying something different. (Specifically using 168 grain A-max bullets with a starting load of 55 gr. of H4350) Lee's reloading data shows this starting PSI of 48455 PSI . Would this be safe to try, or is H4350 too slow of a powder to use? Thanks any and all information would be helpful

    Oh and I tried doing a thread search so this wouldnt be the 1001st thread on reloading for the garand, but I couldnt find the answer to my question
     
  2. ReloaderFred

    ReloaderFred Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    5,746
    Location:
    Oregon Coast
    You'll want to stick with powders in burning rate between IMR 3031 as the fastest and IMR 4320 as the slowest. If you use a slow powder like H4350, you run the risk of too much port pressure, which will bend that expensive operating rod.

    The Garand is designed for ammunition with an average chamber pressure of 50,000 psi.

    Hope this helps.

    Fred
     
  3. GarandOwner

    GarandOwner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    537
    Location:
    Florida
    Thanks Fred that makes sense now. Im guessing then that Port pressure is independant of chamber pressure? (Meaning just because one round has a chamber pressure of 50,000 and a safe port pressure doesnt mean that another round with a chamber pressure of 50,000 will have also have a safe port pressure.) My next question would be, how can you tell what is a safe maximum load for one of the powders within this range? Or should they be about the same as the max load for any gun using these powders?
     
  4. ReloaderFred

    ReloaderFred Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    5,746
    Location:
    Oregon Coast
    Just load for the Garand like you would any other 30-06, but stay in the powder burn rate range I gave you. One thing though, I've owned as many as 9 Garands at one time, but I'm down to 5 of them right now. Every one I've owned had what might be called a "generous" chamber. They seem to run on the long side for headspace, averaging about .008" over SAAMI minimum. If your rifle is in that range, then you'll get case separations if you size your brass back to minimum. If you have the means, measure your fired brass and then set up your sizing die so you're setting the shoulder back about .002"-.003", and your brass will last longer. I use the RCBS Precision Mic die for both measuring the brass and setting up the die.

    Yes, port pressure is independant of chamber pressure. IMR 4895 was made specifically for the Garand and it's an excellent powder for it.

    Hope this helps.

    Fred
     
  5. dmazur

    dmazur Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,263
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    I reload .30-06 for other rifles and I couldn't stand not being able to use Varget in the Garand. It is a little bit on the slow side, which I understand creates too long a pressure pulse at the gas port.

    Somewhere I read that it's the energy under the curve that damages the op rod, not the maximum pressure at the port. I know, the pressure's only there for milliseconds, but it makes a difference.

    The solution is an adjustable gas nut, if you don't want to be restricted to the safe Garand load data.

    To use this, you start with the nut adjusted wide open (no rifle function) and slowly and safely adjust it smaller until you get reliable feed. You would have to go through this procedure each time you change loads, if you ever do.

    One way of determining reliable feed, I've read, is to use a single round block in the Garand for this testing. If the bolt comes back far enough to lock the action open with each round, it will definitely be traveling far enough back to chamber a new round. (If you don't do this, sometimes you can get things adjusted so the rifle feeds reliably but you lose last round lock feature...)
     
  6. BsChoy

    BsChoy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Alot of guys including me use varget in thier garands...it isn't that far at all from IMR4064 which is as ideal as 4895...I've actually heard of varget being called 4064 short cut by some
     
  7. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,391
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    Yes, Varget or even RL-15 would be okay for the Garand. You just can't go as slow as a 4350 burn rate powder.

    Don
     
  8. 30Cal

    30Cal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,282
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    2650fps is about as fast as you should go with a 168gr. 2550fps is usually pretty good. Pushing for an extra 100fps doesn't really buy you anything---even the wind drift numbers at 600yds won't really change.
     
  9. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    The sixth edition Hornady manual has a chapter on 30-06 loads for the M-1 Garand.

    They list safe loads for 7 different powders using 150-155 bullets, 11 powders using 168 grain bullets, and 10 for 178 grain bullets.

    Varget is included, as is H-335, RL-12, RL-15, BL-C2, RL-15, WW748, IMR 4895 & 4064, VIHT N-135 & N-150, and others.

    [​IMG]
    rcmodel
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page