ctdonath
Member
Yes, it's their business and we support their right to do so.What's the purpose of involving an FFL in their giveaway? If they want to turn the guns into the police, then isn't that their business?
That said, there are indications that the collection could include some items of real value, both financial and historical. An awful lot of people would find it very tragic for, say, a new registered Thompson SMG or a pristine pair of made-by-Colt-himself Colt revolvers to be shredded just because someone "didn't like guns".
Getting an FFL involved gives an air of assurance to the deal, both that the guns would not "fall into the wrong hands" and that they would actually be appreciated. Analogy: a previously unknown Rembrant is uncovered at a decedant's estate, and the heir thinks it's "rubbish"; if the heir was given a list of 5 total strangers willing to buy, he might just toss it as "rubbish"; but if given a list of 5 recognized museums, he might accept $1000 for one of them to swing by and pick it up.
There's a lot of fear among the normal populace about guns being evil and "falling into the wrong hands". Giving the heirs a list of federally licensed dealers may persuade them to sell the guns to "the right people" rather than handing over a magnificent collection to the police to melt down into slag.