Mayor Daley takes another shot at gun-control

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Mayor takes another shot at gun-control

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-gun05.html#

BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter


Arguing that the political tide has turned against the National Rifle Association, Mayor Daley on Wednesday unveiled yet another package of gun-control legislation that looks a lot like the old one.

Once again, the mayor wants to ban assault weapons, mandate trigger locks, license gun dealers and limit handgun purchases to one-a-month, per-person.

The only new wrinkle is the mayor's offer to include a 10-year "sunset provision" to make the one-gun-a-month limit, as he put it, "even more palatable."

For 17 years, Daley has been beating his head against the wall on a gun-control issue heartfelt from his years as state's attorney, only to be shot down repeatedly in Springfield.

NRA: 'Tide is with us'
But last year, the Illinois General Assembly agreed to close a loophole by requiring anyone who buys a firearm at a gun show to pass a criminal background check. Gov. Blagojevich also vetoed three NRA bills and lawmakers failed to override his vetoes.

All of that tells State Sen. John Cullerton (D-Chicago) that the political dynamic in Springfield has changed. "This year in the Senate, there's four Republicans running for statewide office or Congress. Their constituency has changed. They can't just vote with the NRA. . . . Some guy from Pontiac running statewide -- he can't vote with the NRA,'' he said. "That's changed the dynamic tremendously in Springfield"

Todd Vandermyde, Illinois legislative liaison for the NRA, scoffed.

"The tide is with us . . . we were fairly close to overriding a gubernatorial veto and taking away the home rule powers of Chicago. . . . We were only a couple votes shy of a super-majority," Vandermyde said.

The NRA's legislative package will include proposals to change civil liability laws to hold municipalities that prohibit firearms liable for injuries suffered by constituents who are unable to defend themselves. And the NRA wants to apply the same liability approach to Daley's decision not to abide by a federal law that allows retired police officers to carry concealed weapons.

But Daley thinks that at the very least, there's a good chance that a statewide ban on assault weapons will pass this spring. Since the federal ban on assault weapons expired in 2004, Chicago Police officers have seized 519 assault weapons.

[email protected]
 
All that corrupt son of a bitch is doing is fishing for votes. Chicago is notoriously left winged. I was born and raised there. Even though it is illegal to own a gun in the city, caprini green sounds like vietnam on New Years...I wonder where those folks buy their stuff...
 
But Daley thinks that at the very least, there's a good chance that a statewide ban on assault weapons will pass this spring. Since the federal ban on assault weapons expired in 2004, Chicago Police officers have seized 519 assault weapons.

I guess I better get my AK while I can... How does Chicago define an AW?

-Bill
 
Bless their little hearts (and even littler brains), those Libs sure have been squawking of late about gun control--again!
I don't guess those ninnies ever will learn that this particular bandwagon has not won them a national election yet!
 
How does Chicago define an AW?

Any way the want to.

Seriously, Cook County (In which Chicago is located) already has a AW Ban. There is a list of guns that are classified as an "AW" but guns can be added without passing a new law, just by having added it to the list ( I believe it is the Sheriff, not sure). So many of the guns on the list "look" like AWs.

Daley already has an AW Ban in Chicago.

This is part of his publicly stated goal of having a gun free zone that has a 100 mile radius around Chicago.

NukemJim

P.S. Do not worry about "King Richey" running for President, he is currently under federal investigation. Not saying that there would ever be any corrution in Chicago :rolleyes: .
 
Interestingly,

the New York Times has a front page story today (1/6/06) on his problems w corruption investigations.
 
the mayor wants to ban assault weapons, mandate trigger locks, license gun dealers and limit handgun purchases to one-a-month, per-person.
Wait, I thought chicago had banned new handguns. Seems like someone is worrying about more of the state than he was elected to worry about.
 
You know it's funny how all these cities have all this gun control. And somehow they still have all this crime. Maybe they should start handing out guns. It works for condoms and needles. :evil: :evil:
 
Kodiaz said:
You know it's funny how all these cities have all this gun control. And somehow they still have all this crime. Maybe they should start handing out guns. It works for condoms and needles. :evil: :evil:

what do you think the corrupt PD's do with those guns in the evidence rooms?
save them for evidence HA!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top