But people like Breyer are despicable because in their effort to cut down the Second Amendment, they end up writing idiotic arguments designed to destroy substantive rights. Foolish, stupid, idiotic man. He is pathetic. He is actually making a case to limit substantive rights clearly written into the Constitution because he doesn’t like the outcomes. It reminds me of this:
William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
William Roper: Yes, I’d cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned ’round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!
All I think the rest of us need to do is marginalize their whiny little cries for the government to save them by fighting for and exercising our rights and freedoms, and encouraging future generations of Americans to do the same (take your children out of the re-education camps if you can or have to). While I speak in generic terms, I think that the RKBA is one of the most important--if not ultimately THE most important--of these rights.
