MD: Ehrlich, Miller at odds on assault weapons ban

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harry Tuttle

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,093
Ehrlich, Miller at odds on assault weapons ban
http://www.gazette.net/200408/montgomerycty/state/202174-1.html
by Steven T. Dennis and Thomas Dennison
Staff Writers
Feb. 18, 2004 .

Giannetti shaping up to be key vote in Senate

ANNAPOLIS -- The battle over a state ban on assault weapons appears to be turning into a partisan showdown between Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. and Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.

Ehrlich (R) has personally lobbied senators to kill the bill, while Miller (D-Dist. 27) of Chesapeake Beach said he wants a ban to pass.

A vote in the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee had been planned for last week, but it was postponed with the vote in doubt. Freshman Sen. John A. Giannetti Jr. (D-Dist. 21) of Laurel appears to be the sole swing vote on the committee and is the target of intense lobbying from both sides.

Giannetti acknowledged calls and face-to-face meetings with Ehrlich, but said he has not decided how he will vote.

Miller made the assault weapons ban a partisan issue at the beginning of the legislative session, singling it out in a speech to Democrats in which he sought to tie the governor to former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and congressional Republicans.

He said Tuesday that he would like the General Assembly to at least keep in place the federal ban on semiautomatic Uzis, AK-47s and other assault weapons that is set to expire in September because congressional Republicans refuse to allow a vote to extend it.

"I think we should not reward [U.S. House Majority Leader] Tom DeLay and the right wing of the Republican Party, who believe that people ought to be able to bear arms at will and with the weapon of their choice," Miller said, noting that he is a gun owner. "I don't own assault weapons, and I don't want them on the streets I represent."

Miller called the federal legislation "modest," but Ehrlich has opposed gun bans repeatedly, on both the state and federal levels.

Paul E. Schurick, Ehrlich's communications director, said the assault weapons ban "has nothing to do with Tom DeLay or Republicans. It's about public relations." He said the governor remains opposed to the bill and hopes to work with the legislature "to find a real way to stop gun crime."

The bill proposed by Sen. Robert J. Garagiola (D-Dist. 15) of Germantown and Del. Neil R. Quinter (D-Dist. 13) of Columbia goes significantly beyond the federal gun ban, targeting what they call "copycat" assault rifles, such as the Bushmaster rifle used in the 2002 sniper attacks.

Garagiola said he still expects Giannetti to support the bill, providing a 6-5 margin. Supporters have made not-so-subtle hints to Giannetti and other Democrats that a vote against the ban could spark a primary challenge. "They'll have to answer to their constituents," Garagiola said.

He said he would be willing to scale back the bill to the federal ban if that is what it will take to pass it. At issue is not just the key committee vote but political considerations for Democratic senators in competitive districts who will have to make a difficult vote on the Senate floor to end a certain filibuster, Garagiola acknowledged.

Supporters point to strong poll results in favor of an assault weapons ban, but opponents note that the pro-gun lobby has successfully unseated powerful lawmakers who backed gun control measures in the past, including former House Speaker Casper R. Taylor Jr.

Any assault weapons ban would represent a dilemma for Ehrlich if it reaches his desk. He would be faced with vetoing a popular bill or infuriating an important and vocal part of his base.

Pro-gun lawmakers crowed last week that they had the votes to kill the bill outright, but with Miller's support, all bets are off. The last time a major gun control bill was bottled up in committee, Miller helped engineer a plan to bring it to the floor via a seldom-used rule.

Judicial Proceedings Chairman Brian E. Frosh (D-Dist. 16) of Bethesda said he believed he has the votes to pass the bill and blasted the governor.

"I don't understand why this administration or any administration, for that matter, would make it a priority to allow assault weapons on our streets," he said.

Del. Carmen Amedori (R-Dist. 5A) of Westminster defended Ehrlich's opposition to the bill. She said those who support banning assault weapons are simply pushing a political agenda without strong evidence that a ban would save lives.

She said the pro-gun lawmakers are trying to protect Ehrlich as much as possible by trying to scuttle the bill before it makes it to the governor.

"All of us are pulling out all the stops to kill this bill and keep it off his desk," Amedori said.
 
At least the article is factual. Nice mention of ex-Cas. Now if we can convince Giannetti that the gun-owners will keep him in office IF he votes against the bill and offers no compromise. Someone had some stats in a recent post about the slim margin he was elected by.

I feel an LTE coming on.
 
Pretty good list of who needs to be crab food. Do good for the critters of the environment and get off peoples backs at the same time.
 
Let 'em know, guys!



Maryland State Senate

Dis Name Phone (410 area) E-mail

01 Hafer 841-3565 [email protected]
02 Munson 841-3609 [email protected]
03 Mooney 841-3575 [email protected]
04 Brinkley 841-3704 [email protected]
05 Haines 841-3683 [email protected]
06 Stone 841-3587 [email protected]
07 Harris 841-3706 [email protected]
08 Klausmeier 841-3620 [email protected]
09 Kittleman 841-3671 [email protected]
10 Kelley 841-3606 [email protected]
11 Hollinger 841-3131 [email protected]
12 Kasemeyer 841-3653 [email protected]
13 Schrader 841-3572 [email protected]
14 Kramer 841-3625 [email protected]
15 Garagiola 841-3169 [email protected]
16 Frosh 841-3124 [email protected]
17 Forehand 841-3134 [email protected]
18 Grosfeld 841-3137 [email protected]
19 Teitelbaum 841-3151 [email protected]
20 Ruben 841-3634 [email protected]
**21 Giannetti 841-3141 [email protected]
22 Pinsky 841-3155 [email protected]
23 Green 841-3631 [email protected]
24 Exum 841-3148 [email protected]
25 Currie 841-3127 [email protected]
26 Lawlah 841-3092 [email protected]
27 Miller 841-3700 [email protected]
28 Middleton 841-3616 [email protected]
29 Dyson 841-3673 [email protected]
30 Astle 841-3578 [email protected]
31 Jimeno 841-3658 [email protected]
32 DeGrange 841-3593 [email protected]
33 Greenip 841-3568 [email protected]
34 Jacobs 841-3158 [email protected]
35 Hooper 841-3603 [email protected]
36 Pipkin 841-3639 [email protected]
37 Colburn 841-3590 [email protected]
38 Stoltzfus 841-3645 [email protected]
39 Hogan 841-3686 [email protected]
40 Hughes 841-3656 [email protected]
41 Gladden 841-3697 [email protected]
42 Brochin 841-3648 [email protected]
43 Conway 841-3145 [email protected]
44 Jones 841-3612 [email protected]
45 McFadden 841-3165 [email protected]
46 Della 841-3600 [email protected]
47 Britt 841-3745 [email protected]


S.
 
Last edited:
My email to Sen Giannetti

Dear Senator Giannetti:

Once again I writing to you with regard to SB288. There is absolutely nothing of redeeming value in this piece of legislation. If you think for one minute that signing more gun control legislation into law will make the streets safer, you are sadly mistaken. By definition, criminals are those who do not obey the law, so further laws only penalize the law-abiding citizen. If this law were in effect during the time the snipers terrorized the Maryland suburbs, would it have prevented the shootings? No, because the weapon was stolen and brought in from another state. Senator, the last general election galvanized the citizens of Maryland who believe in the Second Amendment like no other in history. We are sick and tired of being deprived of our Constitutional rights by those who would disarm us. We would prefer to work with you in making Maryland a better, safer place to live, but more gun control is NOT the answer. Mrs. Townsend and Cas Taylor have felt our displeasure, do you want to be next? Thank you for your time.
 
I e-mailed Gianetti (again) a little while ago.

If SB 288 get passed in the Judiciary, it still has a lot of hoops to jump through. If it gets to the Governor, hope he does not stab us in the back and does not veto the Bill. I have to think it was MD gun owners who put him in office with votes and donations. Then we have to hope that the veto will work.
 
Hey, I actually got a letter back from Sharon Grosfeld.

My letter to State Senator Grosfeld went something along the lines of "I'm a Democrat but I vote my guns, and the assault weapons ban is an infringement of fundamental rights."

[Any typos are mine.]

=================

Thank you for your letter which was received in my office on February 12th. Obviously we disagree on whether or not banning assault weapons serves to protect the public and it is unlikely that either one of us is going to change our position. We will just have to agree to disagree and try to find common ground on the myriad other important social issues facing our society.

While I would never support racial profiling and would argue that your analogy between banning assault weapons and such a discriminatory practice as racial profiling is like comparing apples to oranges, I would just tell you that many different laws constrict individual behavior, yet as a society we accept their need in order to serve the public good. SB288 is one of those laws.

Whether or not I like guns has nothing to do with my support for SB288 and the need to ban assault rifles which most gun owners also support. Whether or not it is "politically incorrect" to own a gun is also irrelevant to the fact that prohibiting the use of assault weapons saves lives.

Given all of this, isn't it wonderful that we live in a country where we can all express our views freely! Thank you again for writing.

Sincerely,

[signed]

Sharon Grosfeld

========================

Well, at least I think she actually read my letter.

Hopefully my letter to Ehrlich was recieved better . . .
 
MY latest email to the Senator



Senator Giannetti,

Despite the overwhelming opposition to SB288, the authors of this politically motivated legislation have once again postponed the vote. They do this due to the full knowledge that they do not have the necessary votes to move it out of the Judicial Proceedings Committee.

Their tactics to secure this vote? They launch a full blown media assault on you as the swing vote on the decision to move SB288 out of committee. These are the transparent tactics employed by the supporters of this bill. Since they have no factual basis for the passage of the bill, they resort to the emotional and political ploys that have so obviously been employed in the last several days.

Senator, the people of Maryland have spoken loudly and clearly on this issue. Where is the "overwhelming support" for this bill that Senator Garagiola claims exists? Where were those supporters on February 10th when those opposing this bill outnumbered its supporters by more than 10 to 1?

The right to own firearms is not one that can be legislated away in a misguided attempt to deal with the frustration of violent crime. In fact, the Maryland State Police's own testimony reveals that this bill will do nothing to reduce crime in the State of Maryland.

The anti-gun crowd threatens retribution against those who do not support SB288. Why is this? Is it because they know that the facts of their argument do not stand up in the light of logical scrutiny?

Senator Giannetti, I thank you for the careful thought that you have already given this matter. I'm afraid that this is more than your colleagues have done in most cases.

Respectfully,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top