wally
Member
I've stated on this forum that I rarely shoot my Glocks (17 & 21) because I can't shoot decent groups because of the trigger. The guns group well off a rest so its not the gun -- its my not being able to time the trigger break when the sights are aligned. Fact is I shoot better groups with my Taurus PT145 and PT111 than I do with the Glock 21 and 17 despite the shorter sight radius because I can time the break of the Millenium trigger much better than I can the Glock's.
The other day at the range the guy next to me had a silienced Glock 21. I was not impressed I could still hear every shot he fired from 20' away with my muffs on Anyways he offered to let me shoot it. Best group I'd ever shot with a Glock! Every bit as good as what I get with my 3.5" Kimber BP TEN II. Trigger was much better than mine and all the extra weight from the silencer really lowered the frequency of sight wander making it much easier to time trigger break to be at proper sight alignment.
Shot his model 17 too which had no extra weight up front and did good enough to be happy with it. Looks like I'll be looking for these 3.5 lb trigger connector kits at the next gun show!
--wally.
The other day at the range the guy next to me had a silienced Glock 21. I was not impressed I could still hear every shot he fired from 20' away with my muffs on Anyways he offered to let me shoot it. Best group I'd ever shot with a Glock! Every bit as good as what I get with my 3.5" Kimber BP TEN II. Trigger was much better than mine and all the extra weight from the silencer really lowered the frequency of sight wander making it much easier to time trigger break to be at proper sight alignment.
Shot his model 17 too which had no extra weight up front and did good enough to be happy with it. Looks like I'll be looking for these 3.5 lb trigger connector kits at the next gun show!
--wally.