• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

(ME) Bills to ease ownership of guns have no merit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Portland Press Herald (Maine)

March 31, 2003 Monday, FINAL Edition

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. 8A

LENGTH: 340 words

HEADLINE: Bills to ease ownership of guns have no merit;
Even defenders of gun rights oppose allowing concealed weapons without a permit.

BODY:
Always a popular topic in Augusta, the right of citizens to keep and bear arms is again on the legislative agenda, but most of the ideas miss the mark.

Several bills have been introduced that aim to loosen existing gun-control laws in Maine, but the need for some of these changes is not entirely clear, even to groups that typically champion unfettered gun ownership.

The most radical idea, proposed by Rep. Michael Vaughan, R-Durham, would allow victims of domestic violence to carry a concealed weapon without a permit, if they complete a gun-safety course. This privilege would not be extended to the public at large.

While it's true that victims of domestic violence are usually women, and that a firearm can be a powerful deterrent to abuse, we are not persuaded that it makes sense to suspend the rules for this one category of people, no matter how deserving they are of increased protection. Additionally, the bill, as drafted, sets no limit on how long a victim of domestic violence would be able to carry a gun without a permit.

For good reason, the Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence and the state Department of Public Safety oppose the bill, and even the pro-gun-rights Sportsman's Alliance of Maine is not endorsing it.

Legislators also should think twice before supporting other measures intended to make gun ownership easier, especially a bill to repeal altogether the state law requiring a concealed weapons permit. In light of the increase in requests for these permits since Sept. 11, such a change seems unnecessary and wrongheaded.

Nor do we endorse a proposal to allow people who satisfy requirements for a concealed weapon elsewhere to carry one in Maine. As they do now, state and local police should continue to review each application for a concealed weapon.

Finally, a proposal to allow applicants to appeal to the state police when municipal officials refuse a request for a concealed weapon may have merit, but we are concerned that state police could be burdened by this additional work.
 
That is until they start taking away the hunting rifles and shotguns.. Then the flannel babies come home to roost...

I can't stand it; you are either for gun rights or you are not; PICK ONE!!

They are their own worst enemies...
 
El Tejon wrote; What a surprise! A "Sportsmans' Alliance" not supporting the RKBA, shocking!

Just another case where we have anti's who just happen to own firearms.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meanwhile back at the bunker, Saddam is now disguised as a pool table as Tommy Franks prepares to rack up his balls.
 
Although, you have to admit that it's pretty stupid to just give blanket CCW to domestic violence victims. How would you prove it? Do you need a note from a judge? I've got it! How about a Domestic Violence Victim License to replace that CCL that you don't need?

It would be better to just give it to all the people. You could start a Vermont-style roll across the country. It would be priceless to watch the Antis explain how it caused such carnage in Vermont.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top