(MN) Even talking about concealed carry is grounds for suspension

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
After the Virginia Tech tragedy, even talking about concealed carry is grounds for suspension

Gun Shy

Troy Scheffler had no idea that advocating for the right to bear arms would get him kicked off Hamline University's campus

by Ward Rubrecht
May 9, 2007

Sipping soda from a straw and leaning on his elbows at Perkins, Troy Scheffler seems harmless enough. The 31-year-old Hamline University grad student resembles a post-Pulp Fiction John Travolta—slightly overstuffed, with graying sideburns and a small, tense smile. It's easy to imagine him hitting on a girl at a dance club.

But Scheffler is packing heat. A gun-toting concealed carry permit holder, he rarely leaves home without his sidearm. He feels safer in the rough areas of town when he's armed, though he knows not everyone feels safe around him. A couple of days ago, he got pulled over for speeding. When the cop noticed the concealed carry permit, he ordered Scheffler out of the car, patted him down, and searched his car.

"A clear violation of my Fourth Amendment rights," Scheffler says with an exasperated chuckle, referring to the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure.

It wasn't the first time Scheffler's gun got him into trouble.

On April 16, colleges were rocked by the news coming out of Virginia Tech. Initial reports were sketchy and confused, but by the end of the day a clear picture emerged: An angry and deranged Seung-Hui Cho had killed 32 students and faculty before turning his gun on himself in the largest mass shooting in American history.

In the aftermath, officials at Hamline University sought to comfort their 4,000 students. David Stern, the vice president for academic and student affairs, sent a campus-wide email offering extra counseling sessions for those who needed help coping.

Scheffler had a different opinion of how the university should react. Using the email handle "Tough Guy Scheffler," Troy fired off his response: Counseling wouldn't make students feel safer, he argued. They needed protection. And the best way to provide it would be for the university to lift its recently implemented prohibition against concealed weapons.

"Ironically, according to a few VA Tech forums, there are plenty of students complaining that this wouldn't have happened if the school wouldn't have banned their permits a few months ago," Scheffler wrote. "I just don't understand why leftists don't understand that criminals don't care about laws; that is why they're criminals. Maybe this school will reconsider its repression of law-abiding citizens' rights."

After stewing over the issue for two days, Scheffler sent a second email to University President Linda Hanson, reiterating his condemnation of the concealed carry ban and launching into a flood of complaints about campus diversity initiatives, which he considered reverse discrimination.

"In fact, three out of three students just in my class that are 'minorities' are planning on returning to Africa and all three are getting a free education on my dollar," Scheffler wrote with thinly veiled ire. "Please stop alienating the students who are working hard every day to pay their tuition. Maybe you can instruct your staff on sensitivity towards us 'privileged white folk.'"

After clicking send, Scheffler didn't think much more about his emails. He'd never felt his conservative views were welcome on campus. In classes, he was often shouted down by students—sometimes even by professors.

But after the Virginia Tech massacre, school administrators across the country were ramping up security. Flip to any cable news channel and you'd hear experts talking about warning signs that had been missed. Cho had a history of threatening behavior and stalking. And a psychological evaluation had deemed him a threat to himself.

So Hamline officials took swift action. On April 23, Scheffler received a letter informing him he'd been placed on interim suspension. To be considered for readmittance, he'd have to pay for a psychological evaluation and undergo any treatment deemed necessary, then meet with the dean of students, who would ultimately decide whether Scheffler was fit to return to the university.

The consequences were severe. Scheffler wasn't allowed to participate in a final group project in his course on Human Resources Management, which will have a big impact on his final grade. Even if he's reinstated, the suspension will go on his permanent record, which could hurt the aspiring law student.

"'Oh, he's the crazy guy that they called the cops on.' How am I supposed to explain that to the Bar Association?" Scheffler asks.

He has also suffered embarrassment. Scheffler obeyed the campus ban and didn't go to class, but his classmate, Kenny Bucholz, told him a police officer was stationed outside the classroom. "He had a gun and everything," Bucholz says. Dean Julian Schuster appeared at the beginning of class to explain the presence of the cop, citing discipline problems with a student. Although Schuster never mentioned Scheffler by name, it didn't take a scholar to see whose desk was empty.

Scheffler has tried to get answers from the university, to no avail. On April 25, he called President Hanson's office to request a meeting, but when he told the secretary his name, she claimed the computer system had crashed and she couldn't access the president's schedule. She promised to call Scheffler back, but more than a week later, he's still waiting.

Hamline administrators were similarly circumspect when a reporter called. School officials declined to be interviewed, citing student privacy concerns. Requests for information were diverted to lawyer Rebecca Bernhard, who said Hamline acted appropriately in light of recent events at Virginia Tech. "Hamline takes campus safety very seriously," she says.

Now Scheffler is looking to hire a lawyer of his own. Even if Hamline lifts the suspension, he doubts he'll return to campus, he says. "If they're going to treat me that way before, how will they treat me after?"

http://www.citypages.com/databank/28/1379/article15402.asp
 
I attended Trinidad State Junior College's gunsmithing school during the late 1970's. We had lots of firearms and no problems.
There are still several schools Public and private that still teach gunsmithing. Not to mention the many shooting schools in the nation.
I haven't read of any problem at any of the schools.

When is the stupid going to stop? The facts support allowing free people to be armed.
 
Sounds like the Twin Cities to me. This type of idiocy is why I'm planning my escape :D. I almost got suspended from high school for suggesting that teachers should be able to carry, and pointing out that the guy watching the door couldn't stop anyone with a knife, let alone a gun, from coming into the school(and this was pre-VT). The only people he could stop were people who didn't want to get suspended/get a referral, as if that threat is going to stop someone bent on mass murder.
 
This kind of sums up why I decided not to be interviewed for a "gun control" story in our campus paper after VT where I was going to advocate the pro-gun / CCW viewpoint. I declined the papers request, worried that there would be negative implications from the University, or my words would be taken out of context and a future school / employer would see my comments and use them against me.

It's sad that I had to assume the worst, but stories like this one make me think I likely made the right choice.
 
And yes, "Thoughtcriminal" exactly! If you have conservative views at some liberal colleges (like UD) its best to keep them to yourself, or at least not express them to the administration.
 
If Hamline U took security seriously, CCW would not be an issue of contention, it would be considered an asset. Think about it, if you don't know who has their CCWs, but you know they ARE roaming about on campus. Do you think Cho would have chosen the path he did or do you think he would have just gone out someplace alone and skipped the 30 some people before he turned the gun on himself.
 
And yes, "Thoughtcriminal" exactly! If you have conservative views at some liberal colleges (like UD) its best to keep them to yourself, or at least not express them to the administration.

And if you have some liberal views at some colleges (like Bob Jones) its best to keep them to yourself, or at least not express them to the administration.

:barf: :barf: :barf:

Crap like this (and the general idiocy surrounding what most college admins think of as "security") makes me even more content with being a college dropout....
 
"A clear violation of my Fourth Amendment rights," Scheffler says with an exasperated chuckle, referring to the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure.

Its a shame that the author of this article felt that explaining the fourth ammendment was needed for the average reader. Sadly the author was probably right.
 
And yes, "Thoughtcriminal" exactly! If you have conservative views at some liberal colleges (like UD) its best to keep them to yourself, or at least not express them to the administration.

I guess I should explain what I meant by this, as it was badly phrased and easily misinterpreted. I meant that its rediculous that those of us with conservative views should have to worry about negative consequences (I.E. suspensions) if we express them to the administration. No student should be punished for expressing opposing views in college, and yet students like this guy are being punished simply for being "Thought criminals."

And green lantern, I agree on what you said about "security." My Campus issued a statement regarding security after VT, yet no talk whatsoever of even amending current policy to allow campus police to walk around armed. Current policy is that their guns stay at the station locked up, and they must radio in if they think a situation might warrant having one. If so, a gun will be brought out to the scene. These guys go through the normal state police academy and regular firearms proficiency w/ the State Police, yet the Administration won't let even them carry. They say the campus doesn't have enough crime to warrant arming them. The Administration is composed of a bunch of liberal idiots.
 
I guess colleges are only open to free exhange of thoughts and ideas if those thoughts and ideas are the ones that the administation agrees with?


...[trying to process]... :fire: .... :cuss: ... :banghead: ... [head explodes]
 
Amazing! Suspended by the same liberals that babble on endlessly about the wonders of Free Speech.

This is straight out of the USSR playbook. Those that do not believe in the scientific superiority of communism should be sent to mental health professionals and given drugs. Truly terrifying.
 
I am so not surprised I am having a heart attack from being not surprised.

There are few havens for gross intolerance quite like academia, and we pay them to feed their intolerance to our kids.
 
Tecumseh, you do realize that Bob Jones is a private university, don't you? They have every right to have their own requirements for admission. You agree to those going in. If you don't like it there, you don't go (unless your parents are making you).
 
what are the facts

Overall, I liked the story - as someone commented, more positive than you would expect from City Pages. As always, I am cautious of drawing any conclusions based on the facts related in the media.

For example:

A couple of days ago, he got pulled over for speeding. When the cop noticed the concealed carry permit, he ordered Scheffler out of the car, patted him down, and searched his car.

"A clear violation of my Fourth Amendment rights," Scheffler says with an exasperated chuckle, referring to the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure.

The implication is that the officer did a Terry search and then searched the car - simply because of the CCW. In fact, that is not allowed under MN law. The State goes so far as to remind LEO of this - when the officer runs a name or DL on the in-squad computer, the license information that comes back includes, Concealed Carry Permit: Yes/No. It goes on to state, in bold print, that the carry permit does not warrant any additional search or inquiry. I don't have a print out right in front of me, but can post the exact language later.

Point is, a LEO who does searches based on CCW only is going to be in hot water, and rather fast, as they have in hand written instruction not to.

So - there may have been other facts that are not mentioned that led to a Terry frisk, and an auto search. Likewise, there is some other rather odd language that is off the point in his communications. We don't really know the behavioral background that may exist. Maybe there is a legitimate background for concern.

On the other hand, I am not disagreeing about the PC, thought police, 1st Amendment issue here. As we have seen over and over, the reaction to an event such as VT will be ill-advised, over-intrusive and largely focused on cosmetic "CYA" concerns.

I certainly have seen enough university campus idiocy throughout my life. My grandfather was a university professor and university president; my father was a university professor and department chair; my sister is a university professor, my brother in law is a university professor and I (sharing time with trial lawyer and martial arts instructor) am a professor as well. :rolleyes:

I teach at the same school my dad taught at, where I did undergrad. Here is one of the offensive actions by the faculty there a couple of years ago:

WINONA, Minn. - After much debate, the U.S. flag will be displayed prominently across the campus of Winona State University [in Minnesota]. A campus task force has recommended to university President Darrell Krueger that the U.S. flag be flown outside the main entrance of several campus buildings and in public gathering and common areas inside certain buildings. A flag flap began last fall when the College Republicans raised money to put an American flag in every classroom. The school administration approved the plan, but faculty had other ideas and filed a grievance because its members weren't consulted about the project. The grievance was criticized by city officials and others in the community. As a compromise, Krueger created a task force to decide the best course of action.

I gave a pretty pointed statement to the effect that I certainly was not included in this "faculty" objection, and went on to state that I grew up on that same campus, and as a child knew many of the professors there of my father's generation - all, like my dad, WWII veterans. My dad was far prouder of the Screaming Eagle patch he earned as a member of the 101st Airborne than he was of his graduate degrees from Princeton. Only one of the faculty members who had joined in the protest over putting flags in the classrooms ever spoke to me about it - for that matter none of the others could really look me in the eye. The one who did simply told me that sometimes we all do things without thinking, and that he had known my dad, admired him, and never considered how offensive it would have been to him or the other professors of that generation to protest a flag in the classroom.

I also brought my own little flag to my classes.

BTW, Hamline is private as well, not a public university. The school I teach at, on the other hand, is a Minnesota State University.
 
And if you have some liberal views at some colleges (like Bob Jones) its best to keep them to yourself, or at least not express them to the administration.

The difference is that there's only a handful of Bob-Jones-esque schools, and with the exception of the service academies, openly conservative universities are derided constantly. It's almost a scarlet letter to work in a lot of cities if that's where you got your degree. On the other hand, there are schools that are known bastions of liberalism that certainly still attract conservative students and get plenty of high marks. On the whole the system of higher education tends to be fairly liberal. I've got an extremely liberal friend who loves to point out that, as people go farther in education, they tend to become more liberal. I've attended two pretty standard midwestern schools, one state and one private - they are seen as perhaps even slightly right-leaning. I am not even that far right, but I would still say I feel alienated more often than not when political discourse arises, and certainly alienated on the gun issues.

I only mention this because I see what you're trying to do. You do a very good job of keeping topics on-topic, so to speak, by shutting down some of the peripheral dicta that people like to drag in. But guns and schools are the topic here. I do think that kneejerk liberalism is a major component in the general anti-gun attitude in universities today. I know we've got liberals here who love guns, but you also have to concede that those are the exception, not the rule, at least by the numbers. Nobody has to agree with me, but having spent the last six years in universities, I think I've got a pretty good view down. On the whole, colleges are ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
The difference is that there's only a handful of Bob-Jones-esque schools, and with the exception of the service academies
I take exception to associating the service academies with "Bob-Jones-esque schools."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top