(MN) One more stupid crook trick

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
2,668
Location
MN
http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/4725154.html

Top cops miss coffee break, nab suspect
Herón Márquez Estrada, Star Tribune
April 16, 2004

"Officers, we were just robbed!"

Anchor Bank teller Trevor Skaar pointed out a heavyset man in a plaid shirt who was walking away from the bank Thursday, a bag of money in his hand.

St. Paul police Cmdrs. John Vomastek and Christopher Hoskin, who were on coffee break at an outdoor patio, dropped their latte cups, grabbed their guns and ran.

It had been years since either commander had been on street patrol. But they both sprinted toward the suspect.

"Get on the ground, now!" they yelled, almost simultaneously and both out of breath. Their frisk turned up a 5-inch knife in the man's back pocket.

"He had the bag of money right in his hand," said Hoskin, 53, a 24-year veteran who last worked the street in the mid-1990s and now heads the evidence and information unit. "You can't ask for anything better than that."

Within minutes, sirens screamed as several St. Paul squad cars barrelled down the street. One pulled up next to the handcuffed suspect.

"It was nice to hear the cavalry coming over the hill," said Vomastek, 49, a 26-year veteran who hasn't been on street patrols since the 1980s.

"He definitely picked the wrong bank," said officer Mike Smith, who was among about a half-dozen officers at the scene near the Dunn Brothers coffee shop at 5th and Wabasha Sts.

When the two commanders walked inside Anchor Bank, employees thanked them profusely. No one had been hurt, but Skaar said the man had come in about 2 p.m. wielding a knife and threatening to kill everyone if he wasn't given money.

"It was fine work by the St. Paul police officers," said FBI Special Agent Paul McCabe, who said the man arrested is also suspected of robbing the same bank last Oct. 31.

"I swear he was wearing the same outfit at Halloween," said Skaar.

The suspect's outfit did lack one essential.

As Vomastek and Hoskin pulled the 54-year-old suspect to his feet in front of a number of bystanders, his pants fell to the ground.

"He needed a belt," said Hoskin.

News Assistant Susan Hilliard

contributed to this report.

Heron Marquez is at [email protected]

It's good to see that the white shirts can still take down a perp. I have no doubt that this greatly enhanced their standing with their troops.

Wouldn't you think that it would be a good idea for departments to require that all ranks of police officers get some uniformed street time every year? It might help keep them in touch with the people and issues about which they must make decisions.
 
Sure, it's great that there happened to be a couple of cops around, but wouldn't have been even more encouraging if the employees and/or customers of the bank had jumped that dumba$$ instead? I think a few stories like that would do more to discourage potential robbers, IMO.
 
It's a sign of rank. They didn't do street duty anymore, of course they wouldn't be eating donuts!
 
wasrjoe said:
It's a sign of rank. They didn't do street duty anymore, of course they wouldn't be eating donuts!

Nononononono... Read this:

St. Paul police Cmdrs. John Vomastek and Christopher Hoskin, who were on coffee break at an outdoor patio, dropped their latte cups, grabbed their guns and ran.

They were drinking Lattes...they wouldn't have donuts, they'de have Croissants!!!! :evil:
 
I do have to say that if some guy came into my bank with a knife "threatening to kill everybody" I'd not be able to take him seriously. The Cold Steel Recon that I carry every day is bigger than the knife he used!

"That's not a knife...THIS is a knife!"

Hehehehe...glad everything turned out ok.
 
That guy obviously never attended the Minnesota Institute for the Criminally Stupid, or he would have handled it much better. He forgot the one essential tool for a successful bank robbery - a belt.

I heard the Mayor gives some free seminars on the weekends. Maybe he can get some tips while he's awaiting trial.[/garagelogic]
 
I like BOTH options.

Being an older and more - ahem - properous - sort of officer, it always cheers me to see some of my comtemporaries still 'active', as it were.
(Just for the record, I'm still on the front line, as much as that means in my situation. I don't want to be no damn manager; I ain't going and you can't make me!)

At the same time, Cunnivore has a valid point: The "authorities" are not always instantly available, whereas "victims" are. Therefore, if we can somehow 'de-victimize' the 'victims', society will be safer in the whole. Obviously, there will always be those with certain handicaps, the physically and mentally and emotionally infirm, the elderly, but still.... And as a bonus, how much tax money could we save on "patrol" budgeting?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top