Movie review for "The Mist" turns into a gun/political rant

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZeSpectre

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
5,502
Location
Deep in the valley
So what do you think, is the reviewer pro-gun or anti-gun... darned if I can make up my mind about going to see this movie.


It's Scary When Fogbound Meet Hidebound in 'The Mist'

It's Scary When Fogbound Meet Hidebound in 'The Mist'

By Stephen Hunter
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 21, 2007; Page C01

More political allegory than horror movie, Frank Darabont's new film should have liberals crooning, "Play 'The Mist' for me."

That's because in his account of a violent invasion from another world, the true villain turns out not to be the flying, insectoid, dinosaurian human flesh-eaters, but an irresponsible religious schemer who uses the crisis to take power and instill her crude religious practices (including human sacrifice) on the gullible masses.

But before you accuse Darabont of taking his talking points from MoveOn.org, it should be noted he could just as easily be on the NRA.org media alert list. The filmmaker also endorses a powerful theme in conservative politics -- he has fashioned "The Mist" into an argument not only for the Second Amendment but for the locus of the fracas itself, the handgun, as a necessary tool for survival by the weak against the strong.

On top of that, you get to watch Truman Capote jump over a giant tentacle from Outer Space!

Okay, it's not Truman Capote, it's an actor who once played him brilliantly, Toby Jones, and who still looks like him. And the giant tentacle isn't from Outer Space, it's from somewhere the movie never makes you believe in. Still, who can resist the temptation to shout, at least inwardly, "Go, Tru, go! Leap that slimy sucker!"

Darabont is something of a Stephen King specialist -- his best film was "The Shawshank Redemption"; he also did "The Green Mile" -- and this time he's working from a King novella. Thus the setting is the inevitable Maine seacoast village, where commercial artist David Drayton (journeyman handsome guy Thomas Jane) makes his nice living designing the jackets of . . . Stephen King novels, many of which are proudly displayed in his studio.

The setup is simple. One day after a violent storm has wreaked havoc, word comes of some kind of crisis at a nearby military base. A heavy, almost liquid mist drifts out of the mountains and across the cove, and soon ensnares the town. By this time, David and his precocious son Billy (Nathan Gamble) are in the grocery store, which is basically the setting for the film as the townspeople become trapped there for two hours by the snowy goop outside

For a time, you don't think you're in a grocery store in Maine; however, you might think you're in the big hall of the Screen Actors Guild, where all the zany character specialists must go in hopes of getting work. Good Lord, what a tapestry of familiar faces -- there's flinty old Frances Sternhagen still playing a flinty New Englander and there's William Sadler doing his dumb-old-boy thing, and on and on. You can say: Well, it's nice to see these extremely talented people who've never quite gotten the big break. Or you can say: The familiar faces make the thing look phony. You know you're in a movie every second.

After adjusting to their new reality (it's raining carnivores!), the townspeople quickly decamp into two cliques, and the political battle between them interests Darabont far more than the monsters from wherever scuttling about in the vapors -- he gives that explanation a single sentence in a garbled soldier's account. Jane's David becomes the leader of what might be called the rationalists, or the cognitive elite, as the movie insists on breaking down society by class lines. These are college-educated or managerial types, outsiders mostly, interested in survival as the answer to intelligently posed questions. What if they come here? Then we must block here. What if they come there? Then we must block there. So they spend their time piling cat food bags against the windows.

The others are led by the great actress Marcia Gay Harden as the evil Mrs. Carmody, the scheming, ruthless religioso. First treated as a loon and dismissed by the elite leaders, she hits on populist chords and soon steals the group's loyalty. Crooning, bellowing, preaching hellfire and damnation like any liberal's deepest fear of the religious right, she becomes almost a dictator and turns the masses into her willing henchmen, even to the point of violence against other trapped survivors. She ultimately claims that the Mist is God's punishment and that every night, someone must be sacrificed to appease his anger.

This grotesquely imaged character aside, the true offense in "The Mist" is Darabont's picture of "the mob." These blue-collar red-staters are portrayed as easily gulled morons, incapable of listening to reason, swayed in a moment by the most insane of voices. Darabont even goes so far as to find actors with what might be called "proletarian" faces -- they seem all big, thuggish men or frumpy, beaten-down, terrified wives. It's quite appalling.

That said, on a certain level the movie really cooks. A couple of the fights -- the creatures have broken into the grocery store and the survivors battle them with sharpened broomsticks, jury-rigged flame-throwers and Toby Jones's Colt .38 -- are brilliantly directed. Of the various sorts of creatures, the big ones, barely glimpsed in the fog, slouching like rough beasts, are the most impressive; the pterodactyl thingies are okay, and I don't think the big dragonflies really work, though the idea of a bug the size of a falcon does send shivers down my spine even now.

I didn't care for a glib twist at the end, which seemed way out of character, given the resilient and heroic nature of the people involved. And the movie could happily lose 20 minutes, maybe even 40, and nobody would notice except everyone would leave happier.

The Mist (127 minutes at area theaters) is rated R for violence, terror, gore and profanity.
 
Last edited:
:confused: Not sure why you are trying to decide? Is there something he said that bothered you?
 
So what do you think, is the reviewer pro-gun or anti-gun
Don't know I didn't read the article because I don't want to spoil the movie for myself. I don't care what critics say if a movie looks interesting I'll go see it myself and make up my own mind;)

Honestly I can't wait to see it, I've been waiting a long time for this one. I used to live not far from King when I lived in Maine and have been a fanatic of his books since I was a kid.

His movies generally either do very well or extremely bad. I think this one will be pretty good.

If you want pro-gun go see Hitman:D Actually I was pleasantly surprised by it I saw it today. Certainly one that will be added to my dvd collection when it comes out.

The problem is whenever I go to the movies as of late they always have a preview for I Am Legend and I get mad because it makes me want to see it even more:banghead: Only a few weeks before it comes out!
 
pro-gun

Stephen Hunter is very, very pro-gun. The movie Shooter with Mark Wahlberg was based on Hunter's novel "Point of Impact". He also wrote a tribute to the Winchester 94 when the New Haven factory closed.
 
MAKSTER - "Stephen Hunter is very, very pro-gun."


Yep.


I'm acquainted with Sephen Hunter. He owns firearms, is a reloader, shooter, and hunter.

FWIW.

L.W.
 
He wrote the article.
It's Scary When Fogbound Meet Hidebound in 'The Mist'

By Stephen Hunter
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 21, 2007; Page C01
 
I just saw the movie today.

Started out anti gun, but once people started realizing firearms might be a good idea, became pro. Then very anti at the end.

Typical Stephen King, he did the same thing with Cell. Can't figger the dude out...

On a side note, the WHOLE theater cheered and clapped during a certain scene with the woman. I didn't care for that much being a CCL holder.
 
I've been wondering, given the reviews I've read.

Cell was absurd... Really, screw the light infantry minuteman stuff, forget your Roy Rogers six-shooter; go hotwire a crane and start pulling down cell towers. If you have to hit the phone crazies, get mortars.
 
The recent tendency to blame religion for things that have actually never happened, or make up freakish scenarios where religious belief becomes a major factor in making situations worse, is disturbing. Practically all of these efforts are aimed at bashing Christian beliefs while at the same time they go to extreme lengths to absolve Islam from any responsibility for the actual evils of the modern world, where real people, mostly Muslims, are butchered everyday by Islamic Fanatics.
Sure Jim Jones was a wacko, and the Branch Davidians may well have brought their fate on themselves. But those incidents were aberations from decades ago, not everyday occurances. Plus Jim Jones had to practically buy his own country in order to set up his little fantasy world.
Hate Mongers like Fred Phelps have long been denounced by mainstream Christians, even those who share some of his prejudices.

I have no problem with Agnostics, they just haven't found a reason to belive YET.
Any honest man will realize that Atheism as the term is used in US English is not supportable. I've convinced a few Atheists to identify themselves as Agnostic and at least keep an open mind.

Well enough of that. Don't wish to start a debate on whether or not God exists.

As for King, I think he is of two minds when it comes to guns. I guess we all are in that we'd much rather some people didn't have access to them, but know that its impossible to prevent criminals from obtaining technologically advanced firearms in any industrialized nation. Heck in Pakistan they build AKs in caves using old railroad tracks and scrap metal from Turkish shipyards.
 
Movie needs Bob the Nailer and a few claymores...

That always make for a better movie. Movies without Bob the Nailer and claymores is like popcorn without salt and butter. Just wrong. :D

As for the dragonflies, one side says you can reason and comisurate (sp)? with them. I on the other hand believe in Flamethrowers. Blind and melt wings in one shot!
 
Stephen King is very liberal. One would think that would define his views on guns.

However, I really can't be sure. I went to high school where Stephen King used to teach (he was already very famous by the time I went, and was long gone, although he did teach a creative writing class of mine for a couple of days.) His department head at the time, who was still teaching and taught a couple of classes of mine, owned a huge collection of handguns.

This teacher also spoke about how much he enjoyed shooting. Many stories were told to us about guns. He was teaching about fallacy and logic in writing once, and I remember plainly one news story that he used. It was the propaganda (his words) about Glock pistols being able to go through airport metal detectors. He explained to us how the person who had written the article obviously had not researched, so we should not believe everything that we read. Pretty refreshing for someone so liberal to teach that.

Stephen King and him were very good friends, so it is probably not unreasonable to think that King may have joined him for some shooting from time to time.

My teacher even commented many times about how his gun views were in conflict with his other liberal views, and how his liberal friends did not believe that he was a member of <gasp> The NRA. Perhaps Stephen King is the same way.

Sorry about the off topic post, just couldn't resist injecting some relevant tidbits here.
 
The recent tendency to blame religion for things that have actually never happened, or make up freakish scenarios where religious belief becomes a major factor in making situations worse, is disturbing.

Roswell, it's only going to get worse. On the plus side, Christianity gets stronger under pressure.
 
First there was THE FOG...and people were terrified, then came THE MIST..and people were terrified, coming soon from BlankSlate productions is THE DRIZZLE... Terror not only has a name it is also just a bit chilly. Wear your hats people, it's a little wet out there.
 
The review wasn't that bad (I just got back from the movie). It was pretty much spot on. In fact, the whole movie itself was spot on, up until the end. Almost all of it was exactly like I envisioned it when I read the book (which I just picked up the day before I first saw a trailer). Of course, there were some discrepancies (State Police cruisers are blue, and CMP (our power company...THE power company) trucks are orange) but for the most part it was very true to form. The thing to remember is that King's books/stories aren't about the props or the surroundings, but largely about the people, and the interactions between them. This was a classic display.

On a gun-related note, I have to say the firearm relevancies were pretty good. They were actually able to count rounds. Something was kind of backwards, though - the character who took the gun and said he was able to shoot, popped in a speedloader and then did the dreaded "wrist-flick" did so to impress upon the other characters his seriousness about his ability to shoot. It worked, too - shut them up right quick. Immediately hit me, though, that if he were terribly skilled with firearms (or even mediocre, for that matter) he would have known not to do that exact thing.
 
Not really

you don't need to read it. If it is by the WaPo, its anti gun

Not really - as noted above, the review in question here was written by Stephen Hunter who is, among other things:

  • the Pulitzer prize winning movie writer for the Washington Post
  • the author of the Bob Lee Swagger and Earl Swagger novels, as well as several other novels
  • not anti-gun
 
The recent tendency to blame religion for things that have actually never happened, or make up freakish scenarios where religious belief becomes a major factor in making situations worse, is disturbing. (snip)

Not to nitpick, but this story was written in 1980. The movie is true to the story (except for the ending, which was open-ended in the book).

Dope
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top