Texasred
Member
I have a first run .357 LCR and I have never been more satisfied with any other new purchase. I don't remember if I have posted about it yet but here goes.
Pros:
Accurate (strangely enough)
Small (little big for pocket carry but can do if you must)
Trigger is ultra smooth
POI is nearly identical for both .38s and .357s
POI is the same as POA
Reliable (it's a revolver)
Light (heavier than my 442 but lighter than my SP-101)
Grips work very well (recoil is not bad at all)
.357 Magnum (no question here)
I can actually hit in the circle at 25yds standing with caffiene in me
Price (gun was much cheaper than a Smith either steel or scandium)
Balance
Cons:
Sights work, but I want to get an orange front post
I shot it again just yesterday. Seriously though I took a real gamble buying this gun and I am really satisfied.
I'm 25 years old and own a Glock 19 as well but I prefer traditional guns, and at the same time I'm realistic. I sold my Colt 1911 because it wasn't reliable. Great gun, I really would like to see a medium frame or large frame seven shooter with the same trigger mechanism. It would be lighter than a Sig 220 (I imagine) and size of a 1911. Maybe compensate the bbl.
I have a 4" GP 100, 442, Smith 686 2 1/2", Smith 686+ 6", Ruger SP 101 2", Dan Wesson 6" 14. This is my go to revolver now.
I think the recoil is better than the 442 with .38+P (even with .357s) because the grips wrap the pistol, where as the Smith metal backstrap directly contacts the web of my hands.
I really want a full size .357 7-8 shooter from Ruger next.
I mentioned I was young because most people my age don't care for revolvers but like 1911's. Go figure? They both carry identical amounts of ammunition but the .357 has more range and power. Aren't finnicky about ammo.
I agree with different strokes for different folks, but revolvers aren't even considered by my friends and at the gun shows i see more of the same. I'm on a rant because .38 ammo is expensive compared to 9mm because nobody buys revolvers anymore.
Pros:
Accurate (strangely enough)
Small (little big for pocket carry but can do if you must)
Trigger is ultra smooth
POI is nearly identical for both .38s and .357s
POI is the same as POA
Reliable (it's a revolver)
Light (heavier than my 442 but lighter than my SP-101)
Grips work very well (recoil is not bad at all)
.357 Magnum (no question here)
I can actually hit in the circle at 25yds standing with caffiene in me
Price (gun was much cheaper than a Smith either steel or scandium)
Balance
Cons:
Sights work, but I want to get an orange front post
I shot it again just yesterday. Seriously though I took a real gamble buying this gun and I am really satisfied.
I'm 25 years old and own a Glock 19 as well but I prefer traditional guns, and at the same time I'm realistic. I sold my Colt 1911 because it wasn't reliable. Great gun, I really would like to see a medium frame or large frame seven shooter with the same trigger mechanism. It would be lighter than a Sig 220 (I imagine) and size of a 1911. Maybe compensate the bbl.
I have a 4" GP 100, 442, Smith 686 2 1/2", Smith 686+ 6", Ruger SP 101 2", Dan Wesson 6" 14. This is my go to revolver now.
I think the recoil is better than the 442 with .38+P (even with .357s) because the grips wrap the pistol, where as the Smith metal backstrap directly contacts the web of my hands.
I really want a full size .357 7-8 shooter from Ruger next.
I mentioned I was young because most people my age don't care for revolvers but like 1911's. Go figure? They both carry identical amounts of ammunition but the .357 has more range and power. Aren't finnicky about ammo.
I agree with different strokes for different folks, but revolvers aren't even considered by my friends and at the gun shows i see more of the same. I'm on a rant because .38 ammo is expensive compared to 9mm because nobody buys revolvers anymore.
Last edited: