Nushif
Member
I really don't think "narrow minded" is the right word here. You're not narrow minded, but rather haver a very narrow focus.
That whole "Only accurate guns are interesting" is incredibly misleading. A gimmicky gun from 1823 that killed some random duke and kicked off a minor war is "interesting." And anyone saying it's not, because it doesn't shoot .0005 MOA is not aware of what "interesting" actually means.
Will I tell you that you should go out and buy an inaccurate, unreliable and generally no good gun? No, I won't, why would I? But will I ask you to reconsider your use of the term "interesting" when what you mean is "good for me?" Yes I will. This has nothing to do with narrow mindedness. It has everything to do with a very simplistic view of a very broad subject, that only distinguishes between black and white.
"Interesting" isn't an on/off switch. It's a very wide range and whether one deprives themselves of this range willingly or because they can't experience it doesn't matter. What matters is the response to this. I for one don't call everything that I can't directly relate to "uninteresting." I would be interested in a flintlock used by Napoleon that sits under a glass cover. I would also be interested in one of those rifles that come mounted on a sled, that's really more of an artillery piece. But neither particularly tickle my fancy. Doesn't make the "uninteresting" though.
Ya dig?
That whole "Only accurate guns are interesting" is incredibly misleading. A gimmicky gun from 1823 that killed some random duke and kicked off a minor war is "interesting." And anyone saying it's not, because it doesn't shoot .0005 MOA is not aware of what "interesting" actually means.
Will I tell you that you should go out and buy an inaccurate, unreliable and generally no good gun? No, I won't, why would I? But will I ask you to reconsider your use of the term "interesting" when what you mean is "good for me?" Yes I will. This has nothing to do with narrow mindedness. It has everything to do with a very simplistic view of a very broad subject, that only distinguishes between black and white.
"Interesting" isn't an on/off switch. It's a very wide range and whether one deprives themselves of this range willingly or because they can't experience it doesn't matter. What matters is the response to this. I for one don't call everything that I can't directly relate to "uninteresting." I would be interested in a flintlock used by Napoleon that sits under a glass cover. I would also be interested in one of those rifles that come mounted on a sled, that's really more of an artillery piece. But neither particularly tickle my fancy. Doesn't make the "uninteresting" though.
Ya dig?