Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Navy Arms 1892 Compared to Puma

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Zman72, Sep 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Zman72

    Zman72 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    New Jersey
    I am currently looking to buy a Stainless Steel 1892 Short Rifle from either Navy arms or Puma. I am leaning towards the Navy Arms and would appreciate any feed back. Thanks.
     
  2. mainmech48

    mainmech48 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,846
    Location:
    Indiana
    IIRC, the "Short Rifle" model is made for Navy Arms and I think Cimmaron so there is no direct comparison model in the Taurus/Rossi line. Closest would likely be the standard 20" carbine with a round barrel, which would be both slightly lighter and less expensive.

    As they are (or at least were) all manufactured by Taurus/Rossi current models should be very closely comparable in build quality. Older "Puma" branded carbines are another matter, especially those old enough to still carry the cheesey medallion on the receiver. QC was spotty on those, and overall quality was markedly inferior to those we see now. FWIW, there were no ss models in that line, but I have seen a few nickled examples.

    The Winchester M-92 upon which the Rossi is based is one of the true classic designs. Bull strong, slick, handy, tough and reliable. No matter what particular model you choose, I think you'll be impressed with what a great utility carbine it is.

    Taurus products carry a limited lifetime warranty and they have a very strong reputation for doing whatever is necessary to keep their customers satisfied.
     
  3. MrAcheson

    MrAcheson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,628
    Location:
    Newark, DE and APG, MD
    They're both made by the same people, but with different importers. Navy Arms generally had better wood, better fit and finish, and no annoying extra safety. The EMF rifles split the difference.
     
  4. AH-1

    AH-1 Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    477
    Location:
    TEXAS
    I have a navy arms 92 in 44-40 the action is very slick and doesn't have the b.s. saftey.I looked and the puma's first they seemed ok but the navy was really alot nicer and a few $$$ more but worth it imho.
    pete
     
  5. jbharned

    jbharned Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    Ohio
    Puma 92 in stainless in .357 Mag caliber. Awesome rifle. I did have to do some de-burring to slick it up but it's accurate and a lot of fun to shoot.
    It's the original hillbilly assault rifle!
     
  6. Zman72

    Zman72 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Thanks for all the replies, I appreciate it.
     
  7. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    I thought Navy Arms and Cimmaron imported rifles made by Uberti.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page