NBC Takes Aim at Right to Defend Yourself

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
NBC Takes Aim at Right to Defend Yourself
Posted by Geoffrey Dickens on August 8, 2006 - 12:49.

As more and more states recognize the basic right to defend yourself NBC’s Today, not surprisingly, took a dim view. On this morning’s Today, Ron Mott in a segment headlined by the graphic: "License To Kill, Self-Defense Gone Too Far," Mott slanted his story with alarmist rhetoric and unbalanced talking heads.

Matt Lauer introduced the story: "Now a debate. How far can you go in the name of self-defense? In a growing number of states people have much more leeway to use deadly force. Supporters say that's a good thing but critics argue it's a case of shoot first and ask questions later. We have more on this now from NBC's Ron Mott."

Mott then began the segment portraying the right-to-self-defense laws as a path to anarchy: "Has the 'Wild, Wild West,' gone South?" Mott went on to air three talking heads opposed to the laws including two supposed "victims" of the self-defense to just one talking head from the NRA. Mott could’ve interviewed any number of ordinary men and women that have protected themselves and/or property against criminals but didn’t, thereby humanizing the anti-self-defense law side. Mott then continued to scaremonger: "Many opponents fear the laws could actually encourage some people to settle minor disputes with deadly force, allowing claims of self-defense to over power what some critics say could be criminal intent."

The following is the full transcript of the segment:

Matt Lauer: "Now a debate. How far can you go in the name of self-defense? In a growing number of states people have much more leeway to use deadly force. Supporters say that's a good thing but critics argue it's a case of shoot first and ask questions later. We have more on this now from NBC's Ron Mott."

[Graphic: License To Kill, Self-Defense Gone Too Far?

Ron Mott: "Has the wild, wild west gone south? Rather than run away this Florida prostitute shot and killed a 72-year-old customer with his gun when he got up to answer the phone. Self-defense, no charges. In West Palm Beach."

[Woman: "I never dreamed it was gonna be my son."]

Mott: "This woman's son was killed by a cab driver."

[Woman: "'If you don't get out of my cab I'm gonna kill you.'"]

Mott: "The cabbie says he killed Jimmy Morningstar in self-defense but he still faces murder charges. That's because the shooting happened before the passage of a new state law saying force can be met with force whether at home or in public."

[Chris Cox, National Rifle Association: "You can either run or if you think the best way to survive the attack is to defend yourself you have that option."]

Mott: "14 states, nearly half in the traditional South, followed Florida's lead last October expanding self-defense laws, most offering immunity from prosecution. Many opponents fear the laws could actually encourage some people to settle minor disputes with deadly force, allowing claims of self-defense to over power what some critics say could be criminal intent. Like this case in Kentucky where a man was beaten to death with a lamp. He'd been invited in thinking he was collecting a drug debt."

[Cara Newberg, victim's sister: "Is basically saying anybody can come in your home and if you feel like killing them, if you have a grudge against them or anything you can do this and get a way with it."]

Mott: "The prosecutor settled for a plea bargain to a lesser charge, fearing a jury acquittal."

[Bob McCulloch, proscutor: "You have an absolute right to defend yourself and your property and others from aggression using whatever force is necessary up to and including deadly force but there has to be a review of those circumstances to make sure that, that is appropriate."]

Mott: "Self-defense under review and in the line of fire. For Today, Ron Mott, NBC News, Fayetteville, Georgia."

http://newsbusters.org/node/6840
 
Let's not forget our good friend Chuck Handlon...a Minnesota peacemaker.

chuck-with-leaves.JPG


Chuck believes in apple trees and honey bees and snow-white turtle doves, along with his little soccer friends.

06-29-2003.chuck.press-conference.jpg
 
NBC what is that?

The only NBC I know of is Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical.

/sarcasm

The MSM is irrelevant and in their dying throes. They've lied and cried wolf far too many times and they are finally being held responsible for it by diligent bloggers.
 
The whole thing is warming up again. MSNBC had a special on Columbine last weekend. Sheeesh :banghead:
 
If I wore a "Carries no gun" t-shirt and got involved in a righteous shooting, could I be charged with hunting over bait?
 
someone

bite the bullet and watch the show to get a list of advertisers on there, post those advertisers names and lets let them know that their products will not be welcome if they support this program with their ads.:D
 
Does anyone know what states do have the "stand your ground laws"?? I know they leave Kansas out every time since that is not what its called but essentially is the same law. Steve 48
 
Couple of problems with the deal in Kentucky with the victim collecting a drug debt. Uh, whoever owes the drug debt is just as much a criminal.

And Kentucky hasn't changed any of its laws. The state has never required retreat prior to meeting force with force.
 
They claimed it was going to be the wild wild west down here after they changed the law. Hasn't happened. Most of the gun violence here is still gang members killing gang members. The only ones that have to fear this law is the criminals. The biggest positive change in the law, as I understand it, is the exemption from civil prosecution. You still need to show your life was endangered.
Isn't John Stossel an NBC correspondent? He has done several stories on how more guns actually reduce crime.
Let's face it, people will sensationalize anything just to get people to watch their show and buy soap.
 
ChestyP said:
If I wore a "Carries no gun" t-shirt and got involved in a righteous shooting, could I be charged with hunting over bait?

that's exactly what i thought.

i bought this shirt cause i thought it was funny. now i can't wear it anywhere.



s-notarmed.jpg
 
Byron,

Kentucky did pass a "Stand Your Ground" bill this year, although there was no "Duty to Retreat" in the satutes to begin with, whether at home or anywhere else you had a legal right to be. Although I don't read or watch the local news much I still saw several incidents where journalists made the claim that there was. The bill does provide protection from civil prosecution though, and I believe it also forbids a LEO from making an arrest unless there is reason to suspect it was not self defense.
 
One more reason to like Tennessee...

We have had this a while.

39-11-611. Self-defense.

(a) A person is justified in threatening or using force against another person when and to the degree the person reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The person must have a reasonable belief that there is an imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. The danger creating the belief of imminent death or serious bodily injury must be real, or honestly believed to be real at the time, and must be founded upon reasonable grounds. There is no duty to retreat before a person threatens or uses force.

http://198.187.128.12/tennessee/lpext.dll?f=templates&fn=fs-main.htm&2.0

The National Broadcasters of Communism can go die somewhere. We can defend ourselves, and we like things like that.
 
If I try reeeeaaaaaal hard, I can almost see where the guy in the yellow shirt is coming from. In a perfect world, no one would have to carry guns, because there would be no crime. However, this world is far from perfect.

I wonder if a hardcoe anti like that guy would change his mind if he were ever beaten and mugged. (I say beaten, because if he were held at gunpoint, it would obviously be the gun's fault and just another excuse to ban them.) If any anti were ever in a life-threatening situation where if they had been carrying a concealed weapon, the outcome might have been more pleasant, would they admit that they were wrong all those years and that everything they had been spoon-fed was a blatant lie?
 
I noticed yellow shirt (PERFECT FOR A COWARD) guy has a wedding ban on. I can not imagine what kind of woman would marry a man like that. Maybe one that felt she needed to be around to save his life if needed. UGGGGGHHHH> Not my kind of man.
 
PACK A PICNIC NOT A GUN!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

LOL!!!!

Mr. Rapist, I know you're angry right now. Let's talk through this over some
potato salad.

ROFL!!!!

Seriously though, is it any wonder the Izlamonutz think we're such pushovers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top