SpeedAKL
Member
No this thread is not about an objective comparison between NCStar and Nightforce.
I was at a gun show yesterday and was surprised to see the vast amount of NCStar and other sub-$100 tactical-style optics for sale. Some tables literally had them stacked high in boxes on top of each other going 50 feet down the row. These same tables also had quasi-convincing knock-off ACOGs, EOTechs, and Aimpoints, mostly made in China. What's more, several gun dealers that had large amounts of ARs as well as FN SCAR, Bushmaster ACR, Steyr AUG A3, and other higher-end fighting guns were also pushing these optics...and lots of people were buying them alongside their new AR. In contrast I saw very few upper-end tactical optics...a few ACOGs and EOTechs here and there as well as a couple Leupolds. They weren't selling much.
I took a look at an NCStar 1-4x scope. It was very similar in appearance and basic function to the Nightforce 1-4x NXS used by the Navy SEALs on the Mk.12 SPR. Besides the fact that one costs $50 and the other $1100, I could see where someone unfamiliar with rifle optics might be misled into thinking this is "just as good as". Given the horror stories I've read here and elsewhere about these products I was tempted to advise some people to not mount a cheap scope on their $1000 AR, PTR91, etc. but I minded my own business.
The question becomes: do Nightforce, Trijicon, Leupold, Aimpoint, et.al. need to worry about cheap Chinese clones stealing the civvy market. or are they insulated enough within the commuinity that uses them (serious tactical shooters) that they shouldn't worry?
I was at a gun show yesterday and was surprised to see the vast amount of NCStar and other sub-$100 tactical-style optics for sale. Some tables literally had them stacked high in boxes on top of each other going 50 feet down the row. These same tables also had quasi-convincing knock-off ACOGs, EOTechs, and Aimpoints, mostly made in China. What's more, several gun dealers that had large amounts of ARs as well as FN SCAR, Bushmaster ACR, Steyr AUG A3, and other higher-end fighting guns were also pushing these optics...and lots of people were buying them alongside their new AR. In contrast I saw very few upper-end tactical optics...a few ACOGs and EOTechs here and there as well as a couple Leupolds. They weren't selling much.
I took a look at an NCStar 1-4x scope. It was very similar in appearance and basic function to the Nightforce 1-4x NXS used by the Navy SEALs on the Mk.12 SPR. Besides the fact that one costs $50 and the other $1100, I could see where someone unfamiliar with rifle optics might be misled into thinking this is "just as good as". Given the horror stories I've read here and elsewhere about these products I was tempted to advise some people to not mount a cheap scope on their $1000 AR, PTR91, etc. but I minded my own business.
The question becomes: do Nightforce, Trijicon, Leupold, Aimpoint, et.al. need to worry about cheap Chinese clones stealing the civvy market. or are they insulated enough within the commuinity that uses them (serious tactical shooters) that they shouldn't worry?