Nearly shot my wife!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would much rather die a madman than a coward.

Since we're talking about special ops teams "dreading" this tactic, I guess I can assume that they too only have 10% success rate?
 
I should set you up with some of the women I once had relationships with. You would have gotten to the point with them where you would have stopped screaming and started begging for them to roam the house late nights.
Maybe, you should get your present wife a bullet-proof vest. Screaming hurts their feelings and leaves emotional scars
 
I hope everyone has learned something useful about tactics and themselves in this sort of situation.

There's very little chance that logical argument will counter something as strong emotion when it's keyed to self image.

For folks that feel that it's "cowardly" for a "man" to "cower" in their bedroom. Good luck to you.
 
What madness would drive men with no experience, no training and no practice to do things that experienced, trained and practiced professionals would not even consider except under the most dire of circumstances?

The same madness that would drive our Founding Fathers to take on the world's largest super power of the day. There are things more precious than life at any cost.
 
What madness would drive men with no experience, no training and no practice to do things that experienced, trained and practiced professionals would not even consider except under the most dire of circumstances?

Someone wanting to "clear" their house after a disturbance is hardly the mindset of a "madman" but rather one of prudence. It's not "I'll hide under my bed till the cops come to save me". Not everyone has a police station down the block either.

My home, my property, my possessions, my family, my life. My rights.

Besides, if you did it all the time you would be more effective than you swat teams would when in your own home/property.
 
The great thing that we did was to avoid the "twitchy game" problem. Not all scenarios we ran the students through were violent home invasions or street confrontations

That completely addresses my objection and it sounds like good training, indeed. Thanks for clarifying.

Speaking of clarification, I'm getting the sense that "clearing" in the sense of "clearing the house" is being used in slightly different ways by different commentors. In the technical sense used by pros, I gather that clearing refers to a situation where there is good cause to believe hostiles are present and need to be removed.

The extended, casual sense of "going to investigate a weird noise" may not warrant the term "clearing" at all. And, whatever action is appropriate is going to depend on the entire gestalt of time, place, kind of noise, history of similar occurrences, and ancillary information.
 
For those like me who are prepared to be injured or killed to protect my family,...

What the heck good would being killed or injured do for your family?

Consider the words of of George S. Patton: "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."

Think about it.

So what happens when you hide behind your bed and they come after you?
Hint: shoot them. That's the whole idea.

If you can see them coming from their only avenue of approach, and you have cover or at least concealment, and they do not know your location, the whole thing is reduced to your ability to shoot effectively the instant you see and identify them.

Are your chances any better then?
Oh, yeah, much better. That it is easier to defend than to attack is a very well known, rudimentary element of strategy.

It is why it takes a much larger force to seize an objective than to defend it.

It's a very simple matter of who is walking into whose ambush.

I would much rather die a madman than a coward.
Go ahead, and let your family find out what happens next.

For most of us, the idea is to not die at all, but to defend ourselves and our families.

If I recall my history studies correctly, the British Redcoats were infuriated by the American rebels' "cowardly" tactics of firing from behind the cover and concealment of rocks, trees, and buildings at Lexington and Concord. In those days professional soldiers were expected to stand in the open and fight like gentlemen.

The problem was, it only worked (to the extent that it did work--soldiers were largely expendable) when the other side played by the same rules.

In the event, those "cowardly" tactics worked very well.

I would rather fight wisely and effectively--and win-- than lose and die due to poor tactics, reliance on bravado, and a misplaced sense of valor.
 
Once again we seem to have reached an impasse. Two sides of an issue, territory firmly staked out, determined not to yield an inch to opposing forces.

The OP has clearly stated he is looking at options in order to avoid a repeat of previous experiences- that's good. Some other folks have had food for thought presented as well. And that seems to be about as much good as we will be able to do with this one, at this point.

lpl
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top