I'm having a discussion with a person on the 2nd ammendment, here is the discussion so far:
THEM:
Meaning the right exists in the context of a "well regulated militia".
ME:
Quick question: How do you reconcile your view with "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?
THEM:
Private carriage that does not infringe the security rights of neighbors.
What's a well reasoned argument to shut them down? Or at least make them understand that they are not making sense?
I'm terrible in these discussions, I know what I want to say, just not how.
Thanks.
THEM:
Meaning the right exists in the context of a "well regulated militia".
ME:
Quick question: How do you reconcile your view with "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?
THEM:
Private carriage that does not infringe the security rights of neighbors.
What's a well reasoned argument to shut them down? Or at least make them understand that they are not making sense?
I'm terrible in these discussions, I know what I want to say, just not how.
Thanks.