38snapcaps
Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2003
- Messages
- 292
I've had my permit since 2001. I started out with a Bersa, then a .38 snub, and now sometimes a Kahr CW9. Usually my holster is IWB appendix, sometimes a leather belt holster on my right hip bone. Or just drop the snub in my coat pocket. Now I'm eyeing a Kahr MK9 wondering if that size pistol and that caliber will satisfy me.
I'm sure many of you have come to this point so I need to hear what you have to say: I'm tired of the struggle. Struggle? What struggle? The struggle of which gun is the right one, which holster is the right one. I'm driving myself nuts trying to figure out which gun/holster combination works.
I've tried Uncle Mike's nylon (my favorite) but some say they're junk. I wore a Fobus for six months and felt stupid with it pushing my jackets/shirts out to the side. I have an ankle holster for the snub but I feel like I'm limping and I wonder if I could really get the piece out in time? Belt holsters, in front of the pelvic bone or behind, allow the grips to jam into my ribs when I sit down or I have to adjust it from behind the pelvis to the front when I sit in a chair to keep the grip from thunking on the back of the chair. Really guys, think about how silly some of the holster ads look showing these huge 1911's, Glock 17's, and Sigs hanging off the waist of someone. Really now, do people really go around all day like that? I can't believe they do.
The 642 seems perfect but it's only five shots of .38. I was very fast and accurate with the Bersa but I worried it wasn't enough. The Kahr 9mm is a delight to shoot, and I shoot it the best, but its grip jabs me no matter where I carry it. And there's the nagging thought-is it (or any auto) as reliable as a revolver? After a couple of days of that I get the snub back out!
And then there's grips. I can barely get a secure hold on the original Smith's grips. I bought some Rosewood ones that weren't any better. So now I have full three finger rugger grips that give me a real secure hold and absorb alot of the recoil. But the grip is too long to use with the ankle holster, makes my pant leg stick out.
I am so tired of it all that I am about to give up and just stick whatever in my waistband or put whatever in my car's console. Or, perhaps, just carry a knife. I know several people that have permits that never wear their handguns.
I wonder if all this is really worth it. I am an avid reader of this forum and I constantly see- "I'll never really need it", or "I've been carrying for thirty years and have never felt threatened", etc. Then I read here, and in self defense articles, that an attack is going to happen so fast you have very little chance of getting the piece out. Or if the threat isn't that close you're going to get in hot water for shooting someone that's thirty feet away because he wasn't really a deadly threat. All this tough talk about two to the body and one to the head and practicing hostage secenarios is just alot of fantasy. Ever read an issue of Combat Handguns? Oh brother, practice this, practice that, go to this school, train, train, train. For what!? You just said the chances of ever needing it are near zero. I'm a musician and I understand the value of practice, but I don't practice Rumbas because I've never played one in over forty years and I doubt I ever will.
And then there's the Endless arguing over which works best, cocked n' locked, revolvers, Glock triggers vs XD's, DA/SA. I am of the opinion a double action only trigger is the best system. I dare not mention caliber wars!
So, is it a matter of accepting "not comfortable but comforting" i.e. I'll never find the right combination, but having the gun is worth it and that's just reality? Or should I keep trying?
A thought came to me today: Quit chasing, just pick one, none of them is going to be perfect anyway, and be done with it.
From your experience, what would your advice be?
I'm sure many of you have come to this point so I need to hear what you have to say: I'm tired of the struggle. Struggle? What struggle? The struggle of which gun is the right one, which holster is the right one. I'm driving myself nuts trying to figure out which gun/holster combination works.
I've tried Uncle Mike's nylon (my favorite) but some say they're junk. I wore a Fobus for six months and felt stupid with it pushing my jackets/shirts out to the side. I have an ankle holster for the snub but I feel like I'm limping and I wonder if I could really get the piece out in time? Belt holsters, in front of the pelvic bone or behind, allow the grips to jam into my ribs when I sit down or I have to adjust it from behind the pelvis to the front when I sit in a chair to keep the grip from thunking on the back of the chair. Really guys, think about how silly some of the holster ads look showing these huge 1911's, Glock 17's, and Sigs hanging off the waist of someone. Really now, do people really go around all day like that? I can't believe they do.
The 642 seems perfect but it's only five shots of .38. I was very fast and accurate with the Bersa but I worried it wasn't enough. The Kahr 9mm is a delight to shoot, and I shoot it the best, but its grip jabs me no matter where I carry it. And there's the nagging thought-is it (or any auto) as reliable as a revolver? After a couple of days of that I get the snub back out!
And then there's grips. I can barely get a secure hold on the original Smith's grips. I bought some Rosewood ones that weren't any better. So now I have full three finger rugger grips that give me a real secure hold and absorb alot of the recoil. But the grip is too long to use with the ankle holster, makes my pant leg stick out.
I am so tired of it all that I am about to give up and just stick whatever in my waistband or put whatever in my car's console. Or, perhaps, just carry a knife. I know several people that have permits that never wear their handguns.
I wonder if all this is really worth it. I am an avid reader of this forum and I constantly see- "I'll never really need it", or "I've been carrying for thirty years and have never felt threatened", etc. Then I read here, and in self defense articles, that an attack is going to happen so fast you have very little chance of getting the piece out. Or if the threat isn't that close you're going to get in hot water for shooting someone that's thirty feet away because he wasn't really a deadly threat. All this tough talk about two to the body and one to the head and practicing hostage secenarios is just alot of fantasy. Ever read an issue of Combat Handguns? Oh brother, practice this, practice that, go to this school, train, train, train. For what!? You just said the chances of ever needing it are near zero. I'm a musician and I understand the value of practice, but I don't practice Rumbas because I've never played one in over forty years and I doubt I ever will.
And then there's the Endless arguing over which works best, cocked n' locked, revolvers, Glock triggers vs XD's, DA/SA. I am of the opinion a double action only trigger is the best system. I dare not mention caliber wars!
So, is it a matter of accepting "not comfortable but comforting" i.e. I'll never find the right combination, but having the gun is worth it and that's just reality? Or should I keep trying?
A thought came to me today: Quit chasing, just pick one, none of them is going to be perfect anyway, and be done with it.
From your experience, what would your advice be?