I thought the .32 H&RMs fizzled due to lack of interest. Hmmm, just got rid of 'old stock', I suppose, in preparation for the new Magnum-Magnums. Brilliant, Ruger... I won't play, however. The .32's I bought in the last two years, a SS BHG SSM and 4" SP101, fought over the title of the absolute worst firearm I've ever bought, QC wise. Sure, they cleaned up... but what a pure shame a bit more care wasn't given during manufacturing.
Now, as to applications - particularly as a CCW. The SP101 is a tad heavier, probably 26+ oz for a 2" .32, vs S&W's best selling current revolver, the 642, and it's 15 oz. Throw weight goes to the S&W - .38's of 158gr are typical, vs 100gr JHP for current .32s (My favorite .32M load is a 115gr LRNFP @ 820-850 fps - great plinker!).
The KE may just go to the new Magnum-Magnum... but will it open? The +P 158gr LHPSWC opens quite well at the 840+ fps it makes from my 642 - that's 247 ft-lb. My 4" SP101 got 1,186 fps from the GA Arms 100gr JHPs - 311 ft-lb (Expect less from a 2" barrel, of course!). In the infamous '2L pop bottle full of water' test - at 12-15yd, the .38's are more effective, pretty much 'as expected'. So, a band of marauding pop bottles are best protected from by the .38. Works for me... the .32 is just a fun round, anyway!
Maybe it'll take-off - and S&W will produce a new Airweight version of the 432PD - with a Ti cylinder - and a frame in an Al/Sc/Expensivium alloy to handle the extra pressure. Maybe 11-12 oz, as it will have six holes... wow, hold me back, I said facetiously!
Actually, I think my range trip today will include the .32's - and their Ruskie 1895 Nagant brethren. I need the trigger finger excercise... Still have visions of a 4" non-ported .500 Mag sending 440+gr LWFN down range at 800-850 fps... now THAT would be protection!
Stainz
PS A difficult admission.... that .32M SP101 trigger really did improve with the lightest springs - and a whole lot of 'clean-up'.