geez, yall are taking magazines too seriously imo....
shoot the friggin gun for yerself, and share YOUR opinion... not too many smart folks shop or review the gunmags with any wieght anyway...
really what do reviews matter... that person is NOT you, NOT the pistol yer holding, NOT of the same skill level, likely NOT testing in the conditions you would..
not to mention, many writers are just that.... writers... Not many of them have fired a weapon in combat, or even defence of them selves.... but they certainly have have their comments on weapons suitable for SD and combat huh.....
then, recently born, are the writers that will insult anything that isnt "perfect" in their eyes.... because they are afraid too much compliment of anything in question, will render them a mere "shill"..... better to be a hardass, than a softass eh...
I havent bought a gun mag since Issue#31 of conceald carry 2006... while it was actually topic oriented (cant say that for most mags) the reviews were weak, I was dissapointed... I was hoping to see information not yet published.... couple things were great... but it was still just a gun mag, as they all are imo....
magazines are for advertisement and making a profit off of advertisement.... just so folks know. nothing new, nothing changed.
best way to judge something is to experience it.
atleaset, thats what makes sence to me anyway...
ip.