New Marlin 1894 44 Magnum Arrived!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Olympus

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
4,212
I just had to roll the dice and try out one of these new production Marlin (aka Remlin, aka Marlington) 1894 level actions in 44 Magnum. As I said before, this was the first rifle I ever carried with me in the deer woods. It was the older version and that was some time ago. I was too young to remember but just a few vague memories of the gun before my dad sold it or traded it for something else. I never had the chance to shoot a deer with it. So I decided I'd get a new production model to shoot and carry with me for deer season this year. I know there were some quality issues when Remington first took over production, but from what I'd read online those models were specific to the first few years after the buy-out and they have since re-tooled and started making better guns. So I took a gamble and ordered one. It arrived today.

When I opened the box, I was immediately struck by how handy the gun felt. Aside from a Henry Goldenboy I have to plink with, I've never really spent much time with a lever action gun. Upon closer inspection, I noticed that the wood grain the stock was simply FABULOUS! The kick was that the wood was SO dry. It was chalky looking and rough feeling, but the grain figure was phenomenal! The metal to wood fit is very nice and evenly fit. The fit and finish on the barrel and receiver are also nicely done. The action was surprisingly not as stiff as I've read most people have experienced. While not the slick as butter feeling that my Henry action has, the Marlin action is still relatively smooth. No rough spots or hitches in the giddy-up so to speak. A quick wipe down and applying some of my own gun oil, it smoothed up fairly nicely. I'm thinking that with some use it should prove to be a very nice action. I measured the trigger pull right out the box at exactly 5lbs. Not too bad considering what I'd read from others on their guns like this. For a lever action gun with no scope, I would call that sufficient. And again, it might well lighten up some with use.

As for the stock, I have decided to use some 0000 steel wool and lightly rub the stock, paying attention to stay well away from the steel. I have already applied one coat of Minwax Antique Oil Finish and the grain is really starting to pop and the surface is starting to smooth up. I will keep rubbing the wood with the steel wool and applying one coat of the Antique Oil Finish per day until I get the desired satin finish to the stock. But I would be lying if I said I was not immediately impressed with this gun. I'm looking forward to getting the components together to start reloading. I bought some Hornady 200gr XTP bullets that I'll use for hunting and I'll get some lead or plated bullets for pllinking.


File_003 (2).jpeg
File_005 (1).jpeg File_000 (4).jpeg File_006 (1).jpeg File_001 (3).jpeg File_002 (3).jpeg File_004 (1).jpeg File_007 (1).jpeg
 
Try a couple dabs of fine lapping compound on the action rails and work the action about 50-75 times. That will slick it up fast. And the 200 XTP's are good. But you might try some 240's. Your gun, your choice. I started with 200's in my JM 1894. It shot ok. Stepped up to 240's and it shot much better. Switched to 240 Sierra JHC's over 22.5gr of H-110 and it's now where I want it. And it's a deer and pig thumper.

But you're absolutely right. That is some fine grain.
 
great looking rifle thanks for the write up and pictures! I just got a Rossi 92 I'm .357, but I wanted one of these just couldn't find one locally.
 
Last edited:
I only have one Marlin in 44 Magnum,its a1894P,like new, only 20 rounds threw it. I am thinking about a Henry.
 
Olympus

Nice Marlin! I also have noticed how dry the wood seemed on a couple of other Marlins that I was looking at. Well worth your efforts to give that beautiful wood grain a proper finish.
 
IMG_0015.JPG Sounds like the two 1895 .45/70's I got last fall. The one I've scoped and shot is a "shooter", too. I'd like to trade the #2 for a 1894 in .44mag.
(Walmart "close-outs", I've got $270 in each...).
 
Thanks guys. The steel wool and Antique Oil Finish are really starting to help bring out the beauty of the wood. I don't want to get it too glossy looking so once it feels like the grain is sealed up well, I'll knock some of the sheen down and it should be perfect. Hard to believe someone would immediately start refinishing the stock on a brand new gun right out of the box, but something had to be done to that overly dried out wood.
 
Action work on an 1894 is not hard, and can make a good gun great. This is a good place to start http://marauder.homestead.com/files/tuning_m_1894.htm

But basically, ever marlin of any vintage I have ever handled was massively over sprung. Clip the plunger lever, hammer spring, take the dogleg out of the ejector and you have a much smoother gun. The real trick though, is to take some of the hammer nose off so that the bolt doesn't over cock it and then force it down again upon closing.

Nice to see marlin is getting their act together as far as qc goes, though for the life of me I can't figure out why they are making the 44 instead of the 357s.
 
Very nice Carbine!! I have a JM stamped Marlin M-94S .44 Magnum. I have no complaints except for that Micro Groove barrel I have.
 
That is a beautiful rifle. When I got mine in the mid 1970s they were fine rifles but not nearly as nice as yours. There was no checkering and the forearm was a tad skinny. Despite it's plainness, I like it a lot and have taken deer with it. It carries a 2-1/2 X old steel tubed Weaver scope but spent most of its life with a Lyman receiver sight.
 
Action work on an 1894 is not hard, and can make a good gun great. This is a good place to start http://marauder.homestead.com/files/tuning_m_1894.htm

But basically, ever marlin of any vintage I have ever handled was massively over sprung. Clip the plunger lever, hammer spring, take the dogleg out of the ejector and you have a much smoother gun. The real trick though, is to take some of the hammer nose off so that the bolt doesn't over cock it and then force it down again upon closing.

Nice to see marlin is getting their act together as far as qc goes, though for the life of me I can't figure out why they are making the 44 instead of the 357s.

I don't think that I want to get into all of that right now. I'm just working the action and dry firing for now. After a few hundred rounds, it may not even need tuning. Especially if it's just going to be a backyard plinker and a short range open sight deer rifle.
 
That is a beautiful rifle. When I got mine in the mid 1970s they were fine rifles but not nearly as nice as yours. There was no checkering and the forearm was a tad skinny. Despite it's plainness, I like it a lot and have taken deer with it. It carries a 2-1/2 X old steel tubed Weaver scope but spent most of its life with a Lyman receiver sight.
I don't really remember much about the old one that I had when I was little. My dad said that it also did not have any checkering. My dad said he liked my new production model, but said he wished they would not have put the additional safety on it.

I've noticed that even when the external safety is on, pulling the trigger will drop the hammer at least partially. Is that normal? Seems like every gun I've ever handled would not allow the trigger to be pulled at all when the safety was engaged.
 
I don't think that I want to get into all of that right now. I'm just working the action and dry firing for now. After a few hundred rounds, it may not even need tuning. Especially if it's just going to be a backyard plinker and a short range open sight deer rifle.

take your time, enjoy it as it is. They're nice. Just be advised, they can be better. After a few hundred rounds, it will still need those springs lightened and the hammer nose taken off. the rest of the action will be smooth, but it will still be oversprung. properly set up, you can effortlessly work a marlin action with your pinky alone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top