Tigerclaw_x
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2007
- Messages
- 113
Hello, folks. I been bitten by a new rifle bug. Got bunch of rifles, including such obscure things as NORINCO Hunter, M17S and AR180B. In any case, looking at those TWO rifles:
1. MPAR 556. PROS: Nitrided barrel. Folding stock. AR 15 mags. POSSIBLE 7.62x39 upper (they been promising it for last 2 years). Bastard of FAL. CONS: No iron sights and UGLY, UGLY uber bulky handguard.
2. RUGER Mini 14 5801: PROS: about 100 bucks cheaper. A bit longer barrel (better ballistics better sight radius). Chance to improve the rifle with Accu Strut (which will bring the price up for the very same $100)/ I am very familiar with this system as I have M1 Carbine and M14S. Cons: Non melonited barrel. Not even a chance of 7.62x39 upper, you need to get mini 30 and there are no good 30 round mags for it.
BOTH rifles have pencil thin (.625) barrel (Which is a HUGE drawback). Same as my Kel Tec SU-16A.
Ultimately I would like to get a 20" AUG A3 but that would be 2100 bucks.
Anyone had ANY experience with MPAR 556 Gen 2?
1. MPAR 556. PROS: Nitrided barrel. Folding stock. AR 15 mags. POSSIBLE 7.62x39 upper (they been promising it for last 2 years). Bastard of FAL. CONS: No iron sights and UGLY, UGLY uber bulky handguard.
2. RUGER Mini 14 5801: PROS: about 100 bucks cheaper. A bit longer barrel (better ballistics better sight radius). Chance to improve the rifle with Accu Strut (which will bring the price up for the very same $100)/ I am very familiar with this system as I have M1 Carbine and M14S. Cons: Non melonited barrel. Not even a chance of 7.62x39 upper, you need to get mini 30 and there are no good 30 round mags for it.
BOTH rifles have pencil thin (.625) barrel (Which is a HUGE drawback). Same as my Kel Tec SU-16A.
Ultimately I would like to get a 20" AUG A3 but that would be 2100 bucks.
Anyone had ANY experience with MPAR 556 Gen 2?