It's the ammo-current remington .22 if terrible.
I respectfully disagree. I've found the current Remington .22LR Golden Bullets, both boxed and bulk-packed, to be quite good. Maybe not "excellent", but quite good.
I don't have a chronograph, but all the rounds fired were supersonic, with the exception of a few out of my friend's SBR 10/22 (8" barrel), where a few dropped below supersonic (we had a silencer on it, so it was clear when the round was subsonic). Out of about 300 rounds fired, we had three failures to fire due to priming issues. Not bad at all considering the price.
We also had Remington Subsonic (excellent, very consistent, reliable ignition, but dirty) and CCI Subsonic (cleaner, similarly consistent and reliable). CCI Standard Velocity is subsonic, but with a round nose bullet it's not really as fun shooting milk jugs. Still, perfect feeding with the CCI stuff...but you'll pay $2.75/50 rounds compared with about $1/50 rounds for the bulk Remington stuff. Spending nearly 3x the amount of money for slightly more consistent ignition isn't really a big deal to me...if the bulk-pack stuff fails to fire once in a while, I eject and continue shooting. For competitions, shooting suppressed, or other not-quite-plinking activities, I'll pay a bit more for higher quality stuf, but I've found the Remington bulk-pack stuff to be no more or less consistent in igniting than other cheap plinking ammo like CCI Blazer.
Federal American Eagle works pretty well, and I'd hope that the Federal bulk pack stuff would similarly be good, but I admit to not shooting the Fed bulk pack ammo as I have gobs of Remington, CCI, and Fed American Eagle here.