New Sig P320 Compact 9mm LE Tolerance

Status
Not open for further replies.

shlike

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2014
Messages
78
Location
Shelby Township, MI
This is a new addition to my fleet: Sig P320 Compact 9mm.

I purchased this gun from my LGS for $566.00. It has a unique model designation: W320C-9-BSS-PRE. The owner of my LGS said it was part of an over-run for a large LE order. The invoice says "L.E. Tolerance", whatever that means. The only information I could find in my online research is that on "PRE" models, the barrel is individually fitted to the slide, and is not interchangeable. So I guess the only benefit of this might be slightly better accuracy, which is meaningless to me, as the gun, even in standard form, is much more accurate than I am. The "non-interchangeable" part is also not a disadvantage to me as I will never put enough rounds through the gun to wear out the barrel. Any Sig experts please feel free to reply if you are familiar with this and if I am missing something.

Anyway, the gun came with 3 mags instead of the normal 2 mags, and it has the SigLite Night Sights. Overall, I feel I got a pretty good deal considering what I paid.

I took it to the range for the first time and ran app. 150 rounds through it, a combination of Speer Lawman 124gr. FMJ range fodder, and Hornady Critical Duty 135gr. +P HP, which is one of my favored carry rounds. It ran 100%, no malfunctions of any kind.

The gun was dead-nuts accurate out of the box, but does require a #3 sight picture. The trigger is good, but not great. Short take-up and fairly crisp release, but a little heavier than I had hoped for (I hope the "PRE" designation LE Tolerance model doesn't mean it has a heavy LE trigger..). Roughly equivalent to my Glock 19. I do prefer the trigger feel of the Sig over the Glock, as I much prefer the single lever trigger of the Sig over the Glock "Safe Action" trigger with the dongle in the middle. I do enjoy shooting this gun more than my Glock, because of the more comfortable grip angle (for me, anyway). Shooting from the reset is great!

Overall, this gun is a keeper, and will be an important part of my carry rotation, probably winning favored status over my Glock 19.

SIG%20P320-1_zpsdorw16zv.jpg

SIG%20P320-3_zps048ds236.jpg

SIG%20P320-4_zpsqk8lovfq.jpg

SIG%20P320-5_zps6ujmwuju.jpg

SIG%20P320-6_zps0jf6ukp9.jpg
 
That really is a good price. It is nice that they included the "adverse" trigger also

a little heavier than I had hoped for (I hope the "PRE" designation LE Tolerance model doesn't mean it has a heavy LE trigger..).
It doesn't. The 320 trigger is really oversprung, there are 3 springs that you are pushing against. Grayguns has a kit to address that.

I also like the feel in the hand...very much like my 228
 
That really is a good price. It is nice that they included the "adverse" trigger also


It doesn't. The 320 trigger is really oversprung, there are 3 springs that you are pushing against. Grayguns has a kit to address that.

I also like the feel in the hand...very much like my 228

I am the OP. I wanted to find out officially what the "W" and the "PRE" stood for in the model designation for my gun, so I reached out to SIG Customer Service. According to the rep I spoke with the "W" prefix means that it was a LE order, the "PRE" designation stands for "Pre-tensioned Slide & Barrel", which means that the gun was built with "tighter lock-up" and "tighter tolerances", which would have been specified by the LE agency placing the original order. He was unable to tell me what benefit or advantage that feature might have over a stock configuration. I also asked the rep about the trigger. He looked up the original build sheet for my gun based on the serial number. According to that, my gun has a completely stock trigger and fire control group.
 
The owner of my LGS said it was part of an over-run for a large LE order.... Gun shops are great for coming up with stories. ALL LE and IOP orders include three magazines.

Contracts usually do include spares, armorer classes for a few employees and possibly training on site.

Larger govt. orders such as those done for military (such as the overrun for the actual M11's ) included more stringent testing of a random sample.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top